Jump to content

BRFCS

BY THE FANS, FOR THE FANS
SINCE 1996
Proudly partnered with TheTerraceStore.com

1874

Members
  • Posts

    364
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by 1874

  1. You're probably right but allegedly rhe rejection was based on what happened if we stayed under EFL regulations and were relegated and in that case there was never an obligation to buy
  2. There was no obligation to buy if we stayed under EFL regulations
  3. The promotion clause has no concern to the EFL as we would be then under the EPL
  4. GB "Revealing the reasons for the failure would weaken our appeal" So did the EFL leak it to Nicko
  5. George Hirst was their number one target. I rest my case
  6. GB should have just given us the JDT speech. It was a poor performance from the team. We made bad choices. We didn't take or chances and we'll learn from it
  7. Who agreed for the fixture to be played on deadline day
  8. Start putting a few quid on Forest U21s then as they've suddendly got a lot stronger
  9. Ok maybe Mbappe didn't answer his phone so thats one of the two ruled out
  10. Could he sue the EFL for restriction of trade, Bosman like
  11. Not aware of any strikers having medicals so in my mind that never happened
  12. What if everybody just turns up late to the next game
  13. So if O'Brien deal was unexpected by the club causing it to fail, does that mean that we actually had zero targets which is more concerning.
  14. If deal sheets are in then international transfers have to be concluded by midnight, domestc transfers by 1AM
  15. So just do what Sheff Utd did and pretend you can afford it
  16. Parachute payments making a mockery of competition in this league
  17. Anyone who starts a sentence with "No disrespect to"...and then goes on to completely disrespect whoever they are talking about. Managers who say "Players/team will learn from this"... They never do
  18. Is Declan Rice the most overrated player in the PL
  19. The same Jordon Rhodes who was sold to Boro for 10.5 million
  20. The parachute payments were introduced to allow clubs to offset the cost of being relegated. FFP was introduced to stop teams spending beyond their means. Both systems have failed. Numerous clubs that have been promoted would have failed FFP had they not been promoted. Parachute payments should be restricted to one year to stop clubs using it as a springboard. It's not Burnley's fault for taking advantage of the current system
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.