
roversfan99
Members-
Posts
23271 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
90
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Uncouth Garb - The BRFCS Store
Everything posted by roversfan99
-
Would you have chosen to sell him for £8.4m in the summer or would you have let him run his deal down?
-
v Birmingham City (a) - 1/4/23
roversfan99 replied to NeilInBristol's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
How much do you think we would get for him? Will be a nominal amount so should only be considered if he pushes for it and with a replacement to come in with experience. In the current market especially, its not as if we would get anything more than a couple of hundred grand for a second choice keeper. Saturdays selection could go either way but Tomasson doesnt lose credibility if he puts in our number 1 back in who aside from a few wobbles when carrying an injury has been otherwise excellent this season. -
We had a bid to make a profit on him last summer and turned it down. That was the owners choice.
-
The acid test will always be with anyone that doesn't want to renew and whether they are allowed to run their deals down due to the owners stubbornness. That I can't see changing unfortunately. But it would definitely be a boost to get Carter and Rankin Costello signed up. Dolan hasn't been mentioned but he should also be a priority.
-
https://www.lancashiretelegraph.co.uk/sport/20671027.blackburn-rovers-reject-ogc-nice-bid-ben-brereton-diaz/ It was widely reported so it seems a bit strange to dismiss it as fictional. Nice spent a lot in the summer especially in wages on the likes of Kasper Schmeichel, Ross Barkley, Aaron Ramsey and Nicolas Pepe amongst others. £8m is a substantial amount (half of our transfer spend over 5 years) even if we may have wanted more in an ideal world. We could have signed at least a couple of players on long term deals.
-
No one has advocated selling him last January. Nice bid £8.4m in the summer for him. This £8m doesnt matter to Venkys line makes no sense. Firstly, we have spent about double that across 5 seasons so it would be a very significant amount to us. Secondly, there is FFP to think of. That £8m could have been invested in a couple of very significant signings that could have helped us this season (it's not either gamble and keep Brereton for essentially £8m on a seasons loan or have nothing) and not only that, would mean that if the 85% likely non promotion season happens at the point of making that decision, we are in just as good a position in the following seasons to compete again. Managers and now Broughton have mentioned having assets on long term deals with comparisons to clubs like Brentford who trade assets and get stronger. When the owners undermine the supposed process by not allowing assets to be sold and money reinvested then it prevents that process from coming into play.
-
I still don't think the owners should be intervening, and I still don't think even if we do get promotion that the owners should be making such risky decisions, so no I wouldn't credit them. When we have spent probably a tiny bit on top of the potential Rothwell and Brereton proceeds on transfers right across the last 5 seasons since promotion, it gives you some perspective on how much money we have squandered just to keep those 2 for a combined period of 18 months, and even if the owners were willing to write off that expense and add it to the budget which they obviously wouldn't, but with FFP it makes it an even more foolish risk. It also undermines those below the owners who seem to understand that the key to a club of our resources (as teams like Brentford have shown) is to sell assets on and reinvest some of that on a continious basis. Before the season, probability wise the chances of promotion were quite low, even now they are less than 25%. Can we afford to throw over £8m on Brereton down the drain in a gamble? No. Obviously the key would be to use much of that money to reinvest.
-
They like with Rothwell intervened preventing a potential substantial sale. We now go into a summer having to try and replace him with no money to reinvest.
-
Still an absolute joke that we have let this happen. All down to one family.
-
v Birmingham City (a) - 1/4/23
roversfan99 replied to NeilInBristol's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
Is what he said particularly controversial? Kaminski is our best keeper as is proven over a period of time, he has kept us in numerous games this season and his form this season aside from that last few weeks prior to injury when he was carrying a knock has been excellent. Pears is our second choice and it is a position that managers tend to revert back to their first choice as soon as he is fit again. rigger praised Pears and acknowledged his good form, I think it is a tough decision either way but to suggest putting in Kaminski hardly warrants the response you gave. If Kaminski does come back in, it means we can at least trust that should Kaminski be unavailable again, we have a reliable back up. -
v Birmingham City (a) - 1/4/23
roversfan99 replied to NeilInBristol's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
I think it is an easy assumption to say that his head is "half way back to Liverpool" but he has it all to prove to justify even a squad place back at Liverpool next season. Loan players are often easy targets and are not treated equally on the assumption that they won't be here next season but I don't doubt that he is trying and that it massively benefits him to perform well between now and the end of the season as where he is next season may partly depend on that, and a promotion on his CV would send him back in very good stead personally. He isn't and never will be a blood and thunder type of player, he is not on his own as Adam Wharton has a similarly laid back style. He lost the ball and presumably intended to try and win a free kick which was a very poor decision but to remove him from contention completely would be a huge overreaction. As I said, he was tenacious in playing a huge part in putting us 2-1 up and his general level of performance over the last 2 games has been good so with Buckley out and the transfer window fiasco, as much as I don't think that Morton is anything special, it would be cutting off our nose to spite our face to make an example of him by just totally removing him, leaving only Travis and beyond that, Adam Wharton and Garrett who have started 10 league games in their career between them and Harlock who has never kicked a ball in senior football and himself will be leaving in the summer. -
Emile Heskey of the Rovers
roversfan99 replied to jim mk2's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
I was also too young to really remember Heskey breaking through but to be fair he was definitely more than a bit better than Jason Roberts, for all of Heskey's faults. Back during Heskey's career 2 up front were common and he was an excellent foil for the likes of Owen through his unselfish play, he could bring the ball into his body and link play much better than Roberts who had as poor a first touch as you will see at that level. -
v Birmingham City (a) - 1/4/23
roversfan99 replied to NeilInBristol's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
I am not his biggest fan and he was soft for the winner at Sheffield United but prior to that and also against Reading, he played pretty well and was instrumental both in the goal we scored to go 2-1 up with anything other than a shirk of a challenge and also the winner v Reading. You have mentioned promoting Harlock a few times, do you rate him or is just a case of next cab on the rank? I am sure that it was reported last week that he is about to be released and even if Morton didn't feature we would still have Travis, Wharton and Garrett. -
If it is anything serious then it will have a massive and potentially even terminal impact on our hopes of promotion. Bloody international break.
-
v Birmingham City (a) - 1/4/23
roversfan99 replied to NeilInBristol's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
The team will get a good turn out again with already over 1k sold. It isn' that the team doesn't deserve it if we don't sell out. -
v Birmingham City (a) - 1/4/23
roversfan99 replied to NeilInBristol's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
No but coaches were subsidised and people who cannot attend every away game are always likely to cherry pick games they would prefer to go to, that doesn't need to be spun into outrage. I presume you have attended every away game this season which is fine, fair play if so. Sadly you arent on your own with such rubbish. Twitter is full of people spouting similar drivel, often teenagers living with their parents with minimal outgoings on cheaper tickets and with no responsibilities. Do I deserve a play off chasing team in your eyes? I was in Sheffield, the only other away games that I have done this season were the local ones, Burnley, Blackpool and Wigan. I have a season ticket but I took one look at the trains for Birmingham and decided against it. I will probably do 2 more away games including Preston but would struggle to afford any more, even they are a push at the moment. -
Just general qualification, boring. We all know we will qualify for a tournament especially now they are so big, its just going through the motions and for most fans waiting for club football to return.
-
It will be quoted as not being a punishment but wheb senior players have played for the under 21s, it is usually either after an injury, poor form (Travis, Buckley etc) or for fringe players who could do with minutes. So whilst it is not strictly a punishment, the most important players we have who play most weeks at any time wont be asked to do so unless they are recovering or if their form nosedives to the point that they get dropped.
-
v Birmingham City (a) - 1/4/23
roversfan99 replied to NeilInBristol's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
A big proportion of people see an away game as an opportunity to make a day of it, have a few drinks with their mates etc. So even if they can drive, a % would not see that as an alternative. You mean YOU prefer to drive to games. -
Of course, the World is against us.