All Activity

Interesting statement Chaddy. Do you suspect (like I do) that it will just be a CEO title rather than in responsibility?

'Failed to find a candidate' What a shambles..nobody wants the job it seems,nobody wants to work under the Punatics. Everything that is wrong with our Club laid bare. Now,NOW is the time for the Coalition(?) to be stepping up the pressure!

No, just the back 3

Sounds like the role is that dummed down nobody actually wants it. Which means either it stays vacant or we get another no mark like Gestede into the role who has no skills or background in running a football club.

Rob Coar is running the club?! Behave.

my point was people on here saying his injury was fake and he was being left out cos of these possible clauses.

well he ain't currently and its Robert Coar running the club like it was for a period of time of the summer. I like said previously, we will see how much power this new CEO appointment by who we actually appoint

I didn't realise Ismael had tactics.

Thanks 🙂 To me, that only references the injury, none of the rest of the speculation If he is still here in February, and surpasses 50 league appearances, then I will concede that all of the speculation should be put to bed. I suppose Rovers could put an end to any speculation even sooner and give our captain & star player a contract extension

Sounds like the job advertisement may as well read "Wanted, human shield, please apply within"

Can you post Cantwell's statement for me, in full, with a link. To my recollection he said something along the lines of "there are rumours which are false", he did not go into any clear specific's Bennetts was an extended contract, but that also comes with financial tie ins, so in my book is similar to the other two

The Ultimate List should just end in November 2010 with a black page.

Cantwell's statement was very clear and to the point. Point A and B are possibilities of course but so us that Cantwell's injury problems need that period of time to recover. Also he wanted to be right injury wise. He isn't starting but we are slowly introducing him after injury On Bennett point, wasnt it a new contract after so many starts with him?.

It depends what part of the speculation/conspiracy we are actually talking about a - That at 50 league appearances, Rovers are due to pay a fee to Rangers b - That at 50 league appearances, Cantwell is due a pay rise/bonus payment c - That one or both of the above is true and Rovers did not want to stump up the cash d - That the injury to Cantwell was either completely untrue or overexaggerated so that he could be sold before he reaches that appearance threshold & Rovers had to stump up the cash e - That a sale has already been agreed Personally, I would find both a & b to be very believable to the point of at least one of them being highly likely, and we have seen before under these owners, (Salgado & Nelson come to mind. Elliott Bennett stated similar in a recent interview), that they have simply not played players due to financial reasons, so I do not see how anyone can get upset about people speculating based on prior events with the same owners Edit - Herb - I presume you mean given Cantwell's injury? If so, then when did Spurs give an "injured" Ryan Nelson a nice Premier League contract and salary when he joined them from us? I am aware that there was no fee, but they still would have parted with money for Nelsons wages & signing on fee Chaddy - which part was Cantwell debunking? He only ever mentioned the injury , although if he did, then please can someone feel fere to post the link to that for me please as I have missed that

speculation from where? who has said this is the case or even the possible on this? is this conspiracy theory from some? We have had Cantwell's comments on this issue and he made them through his own means, so should we not believe him?

I’d be surprised if someone would pay good money for him TBH.

Starts on Wednesday for Edmondson - drew 1-1 - withdrawn on 75 minutes whilst 1-0 down Not involved in matchday squad Olson & O'Grady-Macken - lost 1-0 Boggan - won 3-0 - this will be his final game unless his loan is extended

Can't blame folks for having pause though.

He didnt say when it was tbf.

I would be surprised if the first team came in to play a friendly today, the day after a first team match.

Might as well be hung for a sheep as a lamb on the conspiracy theory front. Cantwell now on 45 League appearances. 4 more takes us right to the end of December. The 50th if he doesnt miss any inbetween, would be Wrexham on New Years Day. It couldn't happen again could it, mysteriously absent again in January before being sold?

If Suhail is still around? Of course he will. He is bullet proof. He is a snake who has been attached to Venkys all this time. We could get a brilliant CEO and he would be set up to fail here. Would be like appointing Pep Guardiola as assistant manager to Steve Kean.

Ah yes, someone prepared to be a willing patsy for allegedly going rogue for the purposes of a Court case (and then not being sacked) Bit like Broughton taking the blame for catastrophic happenings (and then not getting sacked)

Take it they don't mean one of their own, Pratt, so who are they including in that - Miller/Mclaughlin/De Neve/Ribeiro? Surely they dont mean Alebiosu either?