Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. Even if he's suspended it won't be against us
  3. Who else ? but mr suhail and management for not looking into drainage issues...
  4. Alas it hasn't been on the other foot for 15 years.
  5. Carla Thomas and Otis Redding - Tramp
  6. I’ll think about that when you answer my queation
  7. https://x.com/alexnljones/status/1969429175657177187/video/1
  8. How many Ipswich fans travelled..crowd (16,000) higher than I expected.
  9. Anyone else watching Fulham v Coventry ?
  10. A player could get seriously injured during the first 80 mins of a replay that should be 10 mins long!
  11. First available slot to rearrange appears to be 28th/29th October.
  12. Their manager points out Ipswich were still in full voice at the end. Not because they'd won but because having been 1 0 down and reduced to ten men, defeat was turned into a moral victory. Over to you EFL.
  13. Would it be your view when/if we replay the game in a couple of months when they bang in form and we have a couple of key players injured?
  14. I'm only relaying what I heard on radio lancs, maybe he did that because it was their own internal club media. No idea. He looked chuffed at the end of that clip there when he said they'll be back up here in a few weeks.. Oh well.
  15. What would your view be if the game had been finished and a Rovers player suffered a serious injury in that period?
  16. McKenna has spoken to "Town TV" i watched it earlier and he clearly said "when we're back here in a few weeks". It's clear there is no decision to be made and that it will just be replayed.
  17. I would be fine with that and if they don’t want to travel up they can forfeit the result. It happens in Spain I was told at the ground by someone but they could be talking nonsense. As others have said there is no precedent here so will just be a full replay and we get shafted.
  18. https://x.com/IpswichTown/status/1969462213803921856?t=-0q729q0KrMTtmHot4t2Sw&s=19
  19. We’re not necessarily disagreeing on today’s abandonment. I can see both sides of the argument. It’s your claim that the pitch against Portsmouth was “much worse”.
  20. When he went to bounce it and it just went splat I was pissing myself ha
  21. IMO we need to move on from what happened and just accept that the game couldn't continue, it had become a farce, neither team could pass the ball 5 yards. (I know 20 years ago the game would have continued and in our hearts we wish it had, but we know modern football has changed for better or for worse and that these days they do not play in these conditions). There is no way there will be any other decision from the authorities other than a full replay, there is no precedent for anything other than a full replay where a game is abandoned due to weather. What I think people should be more angry about, is the fact our ground is in such poor repair that we cannot host football matches if there is heavy rain. This isn't a one-off, no other local clubs in the top 3 divisions have this issue, but it is happening often at Ewood Park. Why? Because our owners do not care about running the club properly, so we have outdated drainage that relies on a tiny river behind the ground not being affected by... rain. It's item number #588 to add to the list of ways in which the owners have mismanaged and ruined this club.
  22. With 10 mins to go with Rovers winning the game 1-0 and Ipswich down to 10 men. You would think common sense would hand us the win surely.
  1. Load more activity


×
×
  • Create New...