RoversClitheroe Posted Thursday at 10:09 Posted Thursday at 10:09 Set up the go fundme I'll support it obviously. Quote
This thread is brought to you by theterracestore.com Enter code `BRFCS` at checkout for an exclusive discount!
lraC Posted Thursday at 10:12 Posted Thursday at 10:12 15 hours ago, TheKitGuy said: Anyone noticed the Privy account has gone quiet since being outed as a supposed brfc employee Who was it? Quote
TheKitGuy Posted Thursday at 11:31 Posted Thursday at 11:31 1 hour ago, lraC said: Who was it? I couldn't possibly say, I fancy going Ewood this year. This person could perhaps have same intials as the local paper that has recently been banned! 7 Quote
Andy Posted Thursday at 18:27 Posted Thursday at 18:27 6 hours ago, TheKitGuy said: I couldn't possibly say, I fancy going Ewood this year. This person could perhaps have same intials as the local paper that has recently been banned! Pretty sure this was the case, from a couple of difference sources. Question is, where they put up to it by the club, or did they go into business for themselves? Not sure which is worse. Will certainly chip in and/or help with any fundraising also. Quote
G Somerset Rover Posted Friday at 08:35 Posted Friday at 08:35 (edited) The football agents certainly love Venky’s (especially those formerly of SEM). Shameful. Edited Friday at 08:48 by G Somerset Rover Quote
Browjd Posted Friday at 08:50 Posted Friday at 08:50 I wonder if this is the right moment for the Coalition to issue an open letter calling on the Venkys to finally back the club, now that financial restrictions have been lifted. With no excuses left, we expect visible commitment: come to Ewood, invest significantly in January, and give the team the financial (and leadership) support it needs to avoid relegation. Realistically, we know this won't happen but if the response is silence, that in itself will speak volumes and confirm their lack of genuine interest in the club. 5 Quote
lraC Posted Friday at 08:58 Posted Friday at 08:58 22 minutes ago, G Somerset Rover said: The football agents certainly love Venky’s (especially those formerly of SEM). Shameful. Fortunately, most people can see through this now. Quote
G Somerset Rover Posted Friday at 09:29 Posted Friday at 09:29 38 minutes ago, Browjd said: I wonder if this is the right moment for the Coalition to issue an open letter calling on the Venkys to finally back the club, now that financial restrictions have been lifted. With no excuses left, we expect visible commitment: come to Ewood, invest significantly in January, and give the team the financial (and leadership) support it needs to avoid relegation. Realistically, we know this won't happen but if the response is silence, that in itself will speak volumes and confirm their lack of genuine interest in the club. I can guarantee all this would result in is an AI generated press release stating their long-term commitment to the club. Quote
Popular Post wilsdenrover Posted Friday at 11:19 Popular Post Posted Friday at 11:19 2 hours ago, G Somerset Rover said: The football agents certainly love Venky’s (especially those formerly of SEM). Shameful. If it’s so hard to run a ‘medium sized Championship side with 15,000 average gates’ maybe they shouldn’t have fucked up the Premier League side with mid 20,000 gates they bought. 11 Quote
Mattyblue Posted Friday at 12:09 Posted Friday at 12:09 (edited) …says the agent who’s made a tidy sum out of said ‘good people’. Edited Friday at 12:10 by Mattyblue 5 Quote
Tomphil2 Posted Friday at 13:12 Posted Friday at 13:12 The fact he jumped on that so quickly to try and spin the narrative shows some of the same snouts are still in the trough. Protecting their own interests. 7 Quote
G Somerset Rover Posted Friday at 13:30 Posted Friday at 13:30 (edited) 17 minutes ago, Tomphil2 said: The fact he jumped on that so quickly to try and spin the narrative shows some of the same snouts are still in the trough. Protecting their own interests. He even liked my tweet pointing out that he’s rode the gravy train very nicely. More front than Brighton. Edited Friday at 13:30 by G Somerset Rover 3 Quote
Tomphil2 Posted Friday at 13:47 Posted Friday at 13:47 14 minutes ago, G Somerset Rover said: He even liked my tweet pointing out that he’s rode the gravy train very nicely. More front than Brighton. He has no affinity to Rovers and should have zero interest, certainly not enough to constantly chirp up in defence of the owners and put himself in the firing line. The only motivation is to stay on that train and i think what they call it these days is gaslighting. Never responds to the comments on his agency etc. 1 Quote
G Somerset Rover Posted Friday at 14:03 Posted Friday at 14:03 14 minutes ago, Tomphil2 said: He has no affinity to Rovers and should have zero interest, certainly not enough to constantly chirp up in defence of the owners and put himself in the firing line. The only motivation is to stay on that train and i think what they call it these days is gaslighting. Never responds to the comments on his agency etc. Holding out the tiniest bit of hope that when the time comes the book gets thrown at a fair few including that pillock, but I reckon that ship has firmly sailed. 2 Quote
Upside Down Posted Friday at 22:53 Posted Friday at 22:53 8 hours ago, G Somerset Rover said: Holding out the tiniest bit of hope that when the time comes the book gets thrown at a fair few including that pillock, but I reckon that ship has firmly sailed. Never ever going to happen unless there's a literal revolution. Quote
... Posted Sunday at 17:20 Posted Sunday at 17:20 (edited) OK seriously what we doing, another Sheff Wednesday protest/pitch invasion this weekend they aren't letting up bless them. We've gone back to no venky chants or anything at all 🙁 Edited Sunday at 17:23 by ... Quote
BRFC. Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago And this is why we’ll never get these lot gone, how can you defend them? Laughable to me, I think it must be their bots accounts on twitter Quote
booth Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 27 minutes ago, BRFC. said: And this is why we’ll never get these lot gone, how can you defend them? Laughable to me, I think it must be their bots accounts on twitter Oh great, we can buy Adam Wharton's big toe back. Quote
Upside Down Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 1 hour ago, BRFC. said: And this is why we’ll never get these lot gone, how can you defend them? Laughable to me, I think it must be their bots accounts on twitter Thick cunts like that prick have got the Rovers that they want. Also, Keiran Maguire can fuck right off. Know nothing wank shaft. 1 Quote
Tomphil2 Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago I take it this is the money requested months ago ? Match was it ? ...before we then sold Brittain and Travis ! Quote
roversfan99 Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago For the avoidance of doubt as people will suggest it. This doesnt mean that the court ruling has freed up funds, or that January will see a decent budget. They have to do this to cover costs, they have no choice, it doesnt equate to ambition or any change in interest. Championship clubs run at a loss, even one as intent on slashing costs as us, beside one fluke year when we could sell Wharton. Its nothing to be grateful for. 2 Quote
wilsdenrover Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago (edited) 1 hour ago, Tomphil2 said: I take it this is the money requested months ago ? Match was it ? ...before we then sold Brittain and Travis ! Requested in March, approved by the court in May, sent over in June and now turned into equity in September. Edited 2 hours ago by wilsdenrover 2 Quote
SIMON GARNERS 194 Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago ...just about keeps the lights on until the inevitable January fire Sales. Quote
wilsdenrover Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 27 minutes ago, roversfan99 said: For the avoidance of doubt as people will suggest it. This doesnt mean that the court ruling has freed up funds, or that January will see a decent budget. They have to do this to cover costs, they have no choice, it doesnt equate to ambition or any change in interest. Championship clubs run at a loss, even one as intent on slashing costs as us, beside one fluke year when we could sell Wharton. It’s nothing to be grateful for. Precisely - this sum was for statutory and contractual obligations for April to a June ‘25 (as per court order of 26/5/25). 2 Quote
wilsdenrover Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago The money approved by the court at the beginning of September doesn’t appear to have been sent yet btw. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.