Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
52 minutes ago, Scotty1991 said:

Gestede & Pasha need fucking pelting at the next home game! They should be getting a boat load of shit for 90 mins as the bare minimum.  

I would do but I’ll be putting my ST aside and making a bigger point by staying away for one game. It isn’t a lot to ask, no guarantee of it doing anything but I need to feel like I have done something rather than just sitting there for another 90 minutes in the Ewood morgue, while Pasha fiddles and Blackburn Rovers burns !

  • Like 5
Posted

The removal of VI doesn't solve all problems, far from it, but his coaching is poor. The missing players,  and quality of them relative to our squad, would impact any side. That is unquestionable.  However when you are struggling to win, simple logic is make yourselves hard to beat. There's been no sign of that at all under him. Mind you it didn't help selling your most consistent and best centre back and replacing him with a midfielder or right wing back who you want to convert to a cb.

Posted

I don't think sacking him will make any difference because of the idiots above him, but I still want him sacked on principle, no one should be rewarded for performing this badly.

  • Like 5
Posted

Whilst I do agree the problem ultimately lies higher up..  We have had the privilege of some pretty good managers: Mowbray, JDT, Eustace.. I'm sorry,  but we'd absolutely not be in the state we're in now with any of those if they were being backed in the same manner...  

Ismael needs ejecting pronto- he is awful.  HIs record is absolutely abysmal, roll the dice- bomb him out.

Warnock, Allardyce, Bruce, Rowett.. I'd even take Mowbray back.

13 minutes ago, StHelensRover said:

I don't think sacking him will make any difference because of the idiots above him, but I still want him sacked on principle, no one should be rewarded for performing this badly.

 

  • Like 1
Posted

What is VI’s actually preferred formation?

I can’t remember, we went to three at the back because of Cantwell’s injury and our general injury issues? But now we’ve stuck rigidly to it ever since.

I’m not saying our woeful results are purely a formation issue; I just don’t think he has a clear idea of how best to set the team up. 

 

Posted
7 minutes ago, John said:

What is VI’s actually preferred formation?

I can’t remember, we went to three at the back because of Cantwell’s injury and our general injury issues? But now we’ve stuck rigidly to it ever since.

I’m not saying our woeful results are purely a formation issue; I just don’t think he has a clear idea of how best to set the team up. 

 

We started with 4-2-3-1.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...