Lancashire Telegraph BANNED.

[lraC]

1 hour ago, Herbie6590 said:

I can confirm that they aren’t paying us on here..! 😉

I can also call confirm that the post that led to Glen receiving legal threats, was one he made on here. 

[Ghost7]

I feel like a new low has been hit over the weekend and there must be some very rotten and incompetent people in charge at Ewood. They've pretty much proved all the rumours right. 😔

[lraC]

18 minutes ago, Ghost7 said:

I feel like a new low has been hit over the weekend and there must be some very rotten and incompetent people in charge at Ewood. They've pretty much proved all the rumours right. 😔

The two at the Helmn now Gestede and Pasha are as bad as I’ve ever known and are not fit to be associated with the club.

I am also of the opinion that Ismael was brought in to ensure that they had someone who would not rock the boat, when it was plain for all to see that they are at best incompetent, but perhaps it’s deeper than that.

As we have seen over the last few days, they don’t like the local paper saying their bit about the shenanigans, so ensured this time, no JDT or Eustace type was appointed, just someone who is either complicit, or happy to turn a blind eye. 

[Leonard Venkhater]

7 minutes ago, lraC said:

The two at the Helmn now Gestede and Pasha are as bad as I’ve ever known and are not fit to be associated with the club.

I am also of the opinion that Ismael was brought in to ensure that they had someone who would not rock the boat, when it was plain for all to see that they are at best incompetent, but perhaps it’s deeper than that.

As we have seen over the last few days, they don’t like the local paper saying their bit about the shenanigans, so ensured this time, no JDT or Eustace type was appointed, just someone who is either complicit, or happy to turn a blind eye. 

Agreed. I hope the groups within the coalition can agree a protest strategy. 

My own belief is that Venky's, Suhail...and Gestede should all be in the..er..crosshairs lol

[GHD]

1 hour ago, RoversClitheroe said:

 

Maybe BRFCs could look into funding their own bots for FB, Twitter and LT!

I’m certain they wouldn’t stoop so low

[chaddyrovers]

1 hour ago, Ghost7 said:

I feel like a new low has been hit over the weekend and there must be some very rotten and incompetent people in charge at Ewood. They've pretty much proved all the rumours right. 😔

And just go back a week and if we had beaten Ipswich, its would another different story and Ismael got his tactics spot on against a team should be automatic promotion contenders. 

[London blue]

27 minutes ago, chaddyrovers said:

And just go back a week and if we had beaten Ipswich, its would another different story and Ismael got his tactics spot on against a team should be automatic promotion contenders. 

No it wouldn't. 

This isn't about one off results. 

And if it was we just got pumped by Charlton.

[damo100]

51 minutes ago, chaddyrovers said:

And just go back a week and if we had beaten Ipswich, its would another different story and Ismael got his tactics spot on against a team should be automatic promotion contenders. 

For once Chaddy just wake up and see the bigger picture going on here, your constant happy clapping posts are becoming tiresome.

[Clive 62]

This is easy for me to say as I no longer have a season ticket and don’t go to many games atm but the next two games are at home and both will be televised. Perfect opportunity for a boycott. Don’t go to home games until Elliott Jackson is allowed back. I know it won’t happen but still, empty stands on Sky will get us talked about and keep the pressure on

[Hasta]

1 hour ago, chaddyrovers said:

And just go back a week and if we had beaten Ipswich, its would another different story and Ismael got his tactics spot on against a team should be automatic promotion contenders. 

So if we had beaten Ipswich they wouldn’t have banned Jackson?

Edited 1 hour ago by Hasta

[chaddyrovers]

6 minutes ago, Hasta said:

So if we had beaten Ipswich they wouldn’t have banned Jackson?

eh?????

[sharpysharps86]

1 hour ago, chaddyrovers said:

And just go back a week and if we had beaten Ipswich, its would another different story and Ismael got his tactics spot on against a team should be automatic promotion contenders. 

I don't understand what the Ipswich game has got to do with them banning the LT.

[chaddyrovers]

8 minutes ago, sharpysharps86 said:

I don't understand what the Ipswich game has got to do with them banning the LT.

read the comment I reply to, should give you the reply

[xtp]

13 minutes ago, chaddyrovers said:

eh?????

The new low in the post you replied to was the club trying to silence any and all reasonable reporting by getting a decent bloke fired simply because he reported facts. Not the Charlton result.

I cannot believe how far we have fallen from the values of the family-feel underdog club we were under John Williams.

Venkys have done so much worse than get us relegated (twice). They've corrupted the essence of everything Blackburn Rovers used to stand for.

 

Edited 1 hour ago by xtp

[NeilInBristol]

4 hours ago, lraC said:

I can also call confirm that the post that led to Glen receiving legal threats, was one he made on here. 

That’s insane!!!!! This should be a safe platform but I guess them lot have snoops everywhere 

[Hasta]

15 minutes ago, chaddyrovers said:

eh?????

This is a thread about the LT being banned. 
 

Ghost7 says “I feel like a new low has been hit over the weekend and there must be some very rotten and incompetent people in charge at Ewood. They've pretty much proved all the rumours right. 😔”.

On this thread he’s clearly talking about a Jackson being banned.
 

You reply with “And just go back a week and if we had beaten Ipswich, its would another different story ”

So I’m asking why if we had beaten Ipswich, then the main story if the weekend which Ghost7 is referring to, the childish banning of the LT, would be a “different story”.

Instead of asking you to explain, I could have just quoted you and replied Ehhhhh ????????????????

Edited 1 hour ago by Hasta

[Ghost7]

1 hour ago, chaddyrovers said:

And just go back a week and if we had beaten Ipswich, its would another different story and Ismael got his tactics spot on against a team should be automatic promotion contenders. 

My comment wasn't to do with the manager or results.

It was in regard to the board and the rumours about the bad treatment of people. The statements and the personal attack on Jackson is the closest we've seen to that being backed up publicly.

Really poor and concerning way of handling business from the club.

[chaddyrovers]

1 minute ago, Hasta said:

This is a thread about the LT being banned. 
 

Ghost7 says “I feel like a new low has been hit over the weekend and there must be some very rotten and incompetent people in charge at Ewood. They've pretty much proved all the rumours right. 😔”. . On this thread he’s clearly talking about a Jackson being banned.
 

You reply with “And just go back a week and if we had beaten Ipswich, its would another different story ”

So I’m asking why if we had beaten Ipswich, then the main story if the weekend which Ghost7 is referring to, the childish banning of the LT, would be a different story.

Instead of asking you to explain, I could have just quoted you and replied Ehhhhh ????????????????

like I said yesterday, I don't know what Elliott Jackson has been ban for. What comments or articles did the club banned for. Still none the wiser. No club should banned any media journalist from games or press conference. Rovers and LT plus Jackson need to sit down today/tomorrow and sort out this out where LT and Jackson will be at Tuesday night game covering the game 

[chaddyrovers]

6 minutes ago, Ghost7 said:

My comment wasn't to do with the manager or results.

It was in regard to the board and the rumours about the bad treatment of people. The statements and the personal attack on Jackson is the closest we've seen to that being backed up publicly.

Really poor and concerning way of handling business from the club.

fair enough

[Hasta]

2 minutes ago, chaddyrovers said:

like I said yesterday, I don't know what Elliott Jackson has been ban for. What comments or articles did the club banned for. Still none the wiser. No club should banned any media journalist from games or press conference. Rovers and LT plus Jackson need to sit down today/tomorrow and sort out this out where LT and Jackson will be at Tuesday night game covering the game 

We know. So why would beating Ipswich have made any difference?

[chaddyrovers]

1 minute ago, Hasta said:

We know.

what post/comments has Elliott been banned for then? 

1 minute ago, Hasta said:

So why would beating Ipswich have made any difference?

 

Ask Rovers

[Hasta]

3 minutes ago, chaddyrovers said:

Ask Rovers

Rovers didn’t say it. YOU said it.

[KentExile]

18 minutes ago, chaddyrovers said:

what post/comments has Elliott been banned for then? 

 

I believe from memory, that the main post that was taken offence at was one on twitter just after the transfer window closed, were Jackson stated that Suhail had rejected Jacksons/the LTs approach to speak with Rudy Gestede about the transfer window.

Rovers then stated that Jackson had made it personal.  With the issue being that he named Suhail specifically, therefore drawing more unwanted attention to him. 

"This culminated in a recent social media post in which matters became personal"

 

Edit  - If I am misremembering, can someone let me know, apparently Jackson later deleted whatever post it was, so there is no physical evidence of it, just my age addled memory 😉 

Edited 48 minutes ago by KentExile

[chaddyrovers]

5 minutes ago, Hasta said:

Rovers didn’t say it. YOU said it.

see my reply to Ghost latest post. time you moved on

[Hasta]

8 minutes ago, chaddyrovers said:

see my reply to Ghost latest post. time you moved on

Now I know that you won’t explain why you made that strange comment (I presume you misunderstood what Ghost7 was saying,  but as you don’t hold your hand up and admit that like almost everyone else would  I can’t be sure) I will move on. I don’t think I was being unreasonable trying to get clarity.

Edited 51 minutes ago by Hasta