They will if he gets them promoted. He's a proven goals scorer at that level.

Never thought I'd see BB and steal in the same sentence. BB and robbed perhaps...

I'm glad Chapmans back. The rest of the window has been a pile of w ank.

... and Gladwin not sacked We're Blackburn Rovers Our recruitment is cack.

Nixon now saying that he was only 'suggesting' now was the time to go for Gally. Knob.

#hinthint. Wonder who that cryptic boll ox is aimed at?

Link?

Tony: Can I have some money to spend? Barry Bling: How's my £6m superstar doing? Tony: Er, yeah, really well, forget the price, amazing in training.... Barry Bling: Fuck Off Tony.

Graham injured tomorrow. Season over.

Yeah sorry, he collects the subs from Mill Hill U23s is what I meant.

Tinpot. We spend £6m on subs for the U23's.

And a bag of Dabs on loan surely?

Comparisons Between Black Friday and a reduction in ST prices at a football club. Deary me. A reduction in ST prices doesn't devalue the product it just attracts more fans. Unless JW devalued the product when he increased gates doing the same thing?

So if your measure of success is promotion and ST sales only returned to the level of 2 years previously how are we going to increase sales without promotion? Are sales going to increase by 20% on the back of an mid table Championship finish?

You seem only to find relevance in things that back up your own argument. So we can't go off what happened 15 years ago (ST's) but we can go off what happened 15 years ago (match day food sales)? Funny that Slash prices, increase sales. 'Sales for beginners' is that stuff.

Trying to nick Madon's crown on the last day of the window. Shameless.

Lets see how relaxed he is with the 'options' in the squad if he doesn't have Graham available. It doesn't bear thinking about.

Big day for Waggott. He needs to bring in competition for Graham. If he doesn't and Graham gets injured for any length of time we won't be nearly as effective as a team. We've seen that whenever anyone else has started up front.

It's happened before. Slashed prices and dramatically increased ST holders. It was the man quoted in your post that did it. As for the £1.13 where's your evidence?

I'd say it's essential.

Bell had him in his pocket

https://www.lancashiretelegraph.co.uk/sport/football/rovers/news/17393820.rovers-hopeful-of-positive-conclusion-to-bradley-dack-talks/ 'Rovers have opened contract talks with Bradley Dack and are hopeful of reaching a positive conclusion'.

Utter nonsense. He's strong as an Ox and with decent pace. Sigurdsson went for £40m at one point in his career. He has similar 'physical abilities' to Dack.

Nobody on here knows what the initial outlay was so your whole post, whilst trying to be authoritative, actually proves nothing. We may have to pay a guaranteed £6m for all you know. That could still mean we have to pay £7m in total if he does well. Then again we may only have to pay £4m guaranteed and £3m in performance related payments. So it's not simple and clear at all, unless of course you know how the deal is structured?

I said it first.