lraC

It will look well for those who have already booked travel and lodgings, if the 2 fixtures in Spain are cancelled. Surely the opposition must be know by now, as it is less than 4 weeks away.

It was suggested that Lowe was once sacked and he went to the owners and was reinstated. As forever Blue mentioned the Twitter account Rovers insider has suggested he is unsackable and did have a direct line to the owners. It would seem to be a big deal, if he does get moved on.

The outcome of that, would be interesting to know.

I wonder how close they came to not meeting their liabilities?

So, long as they booked it in advance and there is no riot act to be read, it should all work out well.

Sorry, I usually get these, but missed that one. To be fair, I don't think it has been publicised very well, to be honest

I have checked this out and it is tomorrow night, not tonight. I have no idea, why this has not been publicised on here a little more, but perhaps, anyone from the Trust can clarify. Newsletter - April 2025 | We Are THE Rovers

I thought it has been publicised to be honest, but perhaps not. Double check, in case I have this wrong.

i think there is a trust meeting tonight at Blackburn library and perhaps after that, there will be some news.

Hopefully, someone will realise what he is all about, before it is too late.

No problem at all. I am all for healthy debate and let's face it, most on here have the same goal. It would be a boring place, if we all had the same views and opinions.

I am genuinely not giving them any means. These conversations about the impediments have come about, due to my interpretation of what that word means and what other peoples is. I am not for one minute excusing them for not sending funds, quite the opposite. In my view to end up in this position through gross miss management and through manipulating, and miss representing, what funds being sent, for the benefit of the football club, were really used for. I would rather putt his conversation to bed and accept that some people understand the word in a different way than I do, which I am fine with and carry on, perhaps with my little bit if input in raising ideas and posting my thoughts, on how we rid ourselves, of these people. Matter closed, so far as I am concerned.

Believe me, when I say, I am an extremely fierce critic of the regime and have no desire to defend them for not sending funds. It is complete of their own doing that the restrictions have been put in place, namely the NOC, Bond, permission from the court and now apparently the need for an affidavit and I am not for one second excusing them for not sending funds, I am 100% critical of the mess that they have created that has brought about these impediments, restrictions, barriers, or whatever else, we choose to call them Thankfully, they have been able to comply with them and still send funds and I am hopeful that these remaining in place, leads them to think twice about their ownership and in turn, makes them realise that carrying on, is futile and they agree to sell the club.

Incredible after all the effort that you put into doing that, how disrespectful that is.

Absolutely

Not hard to read. It’s a well articulated post and thanks for making it.

I can see where he is coming from too, but as most posters know, impediment is just another word for conditions and as most also know there are conditions to be met. Yes they can meet them and send the funds, but it does not mean that they don’t exist.

I really don't think you understand the meaning of the word impediment. If they could send funds with no, affidavit, no bond and no court permission, they there would be no impediment, but all 3 of these exists. They can send funds, so long as these 3 conditions (Impediments) are met.

I guess getting the need for a bond is paramount and given the reduction to 50% it was a tactic that worked. Whether they go back and try again, in the hope that they can get all impediments removed, remains to be seen. A better option, would be to admit defeat and sell the club, of course.

At least there is no impediment.

Losing, not loosing. Lose, not win, loose, not tight.

Hypothetically, that makes sense.

I think he is the last visible one and I’m sure if you ask Glen, he would say that too.

You align with me on that. I am convinced they are still here too, only keeping a low profile, or disguised with other connections.

He had a hard act to follow really, with Rogers Jones and then Paul Bradshaw being the previous two keepers, who were both outstanding. Let's just say, he wasn't the best and certainly caused a few butterflies here and there, when the ball was in our box.