-
Posts
5913 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
30
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Uncouth Garb - The BRFCS Store
Everything posted by Dreams of 1995
-
ROVERS V COVENTRY 27/2/2021
Dreams of 1995 replied to Hoochie Bloochie Mama's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
Playing well. Brereton is looking ok, just needs to make the ball stick more often. Think Travis still looks off his best. These are a poor side and I think we’ll get away with a win today. -
What are you listening to right now?
Dreams of 1995 replied to TzuyuShing's topic in I Can't Believe It's Not Football
I first heard of London Grammar in a feature they did for Disclosure. Such a good track. Has that feel good feeling to it and perfect for a day like this! That album by Disclosure was very good actually. -
ROVERS V COVENTRY 27/2/2021
Dreams of 1995 replied to Hoochie Bloochie Mama's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
Bloody hell. I didn’t know that, is he never not injured? Poor bloke. -
ROVERS V COVENTRY 27/2/2021
Dreams of 1995 replied to Hoochie Bloochie Mama's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
Not motivated in the slightest. But for what it is worth I’d go for 4231 I thought Davenport had his best game for us vs forest, and was unlucky to miss out on the next game for Travis. Kaminski Nyambe Harwood Bellis Brainthewaite Douglas Travis Davenport Elliot Dack Rothwell Armstrong -
What are you listening to right now?
Dreams of 1995 replied to TzuyuShing's topic in I Can't Believe It's Not Football
London Grammar are an excellent choice o2g! -
What are you listening to right now?
Dreams of 1995 replied to TzuyuShing's topic in I Can't Believe It's Not Football
Thanks Tyrone! I’m not married yet so I should change it to the ‘missus’ really....but if she keeps playing her cards right that could change. Luckily for me her music collection is better than mine so I’ll be quids in Onto music, today was a beautiful day so it was definitely a day for some rhythmic beats. Opted for a French artist called “Biga Ranx” who is sensational. The album “1988” has to be my favourite. Favourite song being “My Face”... -
Tony Mowbray Discussion
Dreams of 1995 replied to Neal's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
Displeased is an understatement. This guy used £10m+ of their money and half of that went on a player who has two left feet and is useless in the air despite being 6ft. The other is BB and I still have faith in him but I think he needs a better manager to play a tune. This squad is capable of going up. I don’t buy that we have a poor squad. When we attack we can be phenomenal at times but there’s no organisation and we often find ourselves with 7 attackers not really knowing what they are supposed to do in defending or transition. Get the back right and our attackers will do the job for us. -
Mowbrays Successor
Dreams of 1995 replied to Darwen Rover 007's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
Any manager that comes here has to be prepared to do it all. At this club he is a manager and not a head coach; he has to oversee everything from scouting, training to buying the tea and biscuits. I don’t think Hughes is that guy. I am a modern bloke but in this instance I want a dinosaur. I want a Mick McCarthy type who has been there and done that - knows how a club who wants to win is run and knows how to get out of this league. We can dream. -
Tony Mowbray Discussion
Dreams of 1995 replied to Neal's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
Change of that magnitude? Pardon the French but FUCKING HELL - they went through managers like nobodies business at one stage. Sacking Mowbray isn’t a change of huge magnitude if you have a stable board, a coaching structure, a plan and a replacement.... .....oh....I get it now. -
Rovers v Watford Wed 24th Feb 19:45
Dreams of 1995 replied to davulsukur's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
I ain’t up for selling our training ground with this lot. Need every help they can get. Lost trust in this guy. Cant trust him. The Cov 3 in their entirety have overstayed their welcome. Where are the “interested owners”? -
I can’t remember the last time I looked on the LT prior to the training ground news. Now I realise why. Quite terrible journalism. There’s a story to be had with Rovers if they bothered. Let’s start with a recent timeline of Waggot, like JH put together, and his links with clubs’ “developments”. There is no smoke without fire.
-
What are you listening to right now?
Dreams of 1995 replied to TzuyuShing's topic in I Can't Believe It's Not Football
I have a pair of Bronz BX2s right now. They are passive speakers and unfortunately the amp died not long back so I’m using a cheap amp atm. The Mrs on the other hand was (is) a fantastic DJ when she’s up to it. She has a pair of JBL eon speakers, but I haven’t quite gotten around to finishing the bar / den / entertainment room so they are gathering dust along with the rest of her equipment. It’s a touchy subject...... JBL do fantastic headsets too if anyone is after a pair, I would highly recommend. -
Has his post been deleted? Put much better than I would Miller, and quite honestly the fact he still isn’t understanding what is meant by legacy of Jack Walker - despite excellent posts by Matty and Revidge also - suggests to me he never will. Having never met Jack, and only remembering the later years of his ownership, I think I can still firmly say that he wouldn’t have sold Brockhall to downgrade and risk our category A academy for a short term financial gain. “Cut throat” business man or not (are you purposely trying to get a reaction Joe?) The idea that the majority agree with this is wrong. A majority of our fans don’t post on social media I would guess and even that isn’t unanimous in supporting this. There will always be some contrarian figures who want to be seen to be reasonable, against the grain, “able to see all sides” but the reality of the matter is that there’s not a positive take on this if you bother to look at the plans in depth. I am yet to be answered (three times I’ve asked him now) what’s to be positive about this training ground? There’s nothing proposed we haven’t already got and, in actual fact, we are losing more than we are gaining. So whilst it is not disrespectful to Jack to “see the positives in a training ground” it is blatantly disingenuous to be claiming there are positives when the proposals show for certain this is a downgrade.
-
Sorry I should have caveated with in the long term. I said beneficial too, not profitable. A land sale will be profitable but to who? We (BRFC) will only see a portion. A lot will go to developers and given Mark Venus track record I’m far from comfortable with that at the moment. Imo it is not remotely beneficial, finance or otherwise, to sell off such good land in order to effectively downscale and also whilst these lot are in charge, because I don’t trust them to spend it wisely. As a fan I can’t even see a benefit yet because im thinking of the day these lot leave as our future. The more they take the less we have to offer for a prospective buyer. Ambition could lead to us needing that space again. I don’t understand how anyone can have a good thought about this with the long term in mind.
-
You can’t use “could” as a pro. Sorry. Nothing they have done has ever been as good as something Jack has done *30 YEARS AGO* It isn’t financially beneficial to the club either. Again, I’m struggling to see any pro to this. Look at the facilities we have, look at the facilities they now propose and tell me again what are we gaining from this? We being Blackburn Rovers btw.
-
This in a nutshell. Selling off land for development is final. Once them homes are built we will never be able to house our training centre there again. We may not use them pitches now but an ambitious owner might do. Selling land devalues our club - they have done enough of that already. I am still waiting for someone to list actual positives of this development except for people other than the club. The proposals do not replicate what we have whatsoever. It’s a downscaling operation and it has all been laid out for us in those plans. If you don’t come to that conclusion then you either don’t understand the plans or quite frankly don’t care enough. This IS a black and white thing. Theres no room for “other opinions” tbh because it is either a good thing or a bad thing and no in the middle. I would argue selling our land is a bad thing when the reality of the refurb is that it’s downscaling. I wait to be proven wrong though.
-
But that’s not the case. 30 years isn’t old in a buildings life cycle - that point is moot. It is the facilities within it that count. It isn’t a more pragmatic use of the space. We are halving our real estate, we aren’t seeing the true value of that because there’s plenty of people to be paid in a housing development. We shouldn’t be looking at cutting costs in training / development. We want to be a Premier League club and this isn’t a premier league development. Next?
-
Ok I’ll bite. What’s the advantage, having seen those plans, in comparison to the facilities we already have? Where does “state of the art” come into it? From my first glance it appears we are downscaling massively, even down to parking spaces. By nature that means less bodies. We are also selling a fine piece of real estate for people who don’t deserve it. A gift jack left us. What’s the benefit?
-
Some people make me laugh. Almost as if the last 10 years haven't happened. I bet we heard the same when Rhodes got sold too. Sell off your assets and it is hard to get them back. We are sat on a wonderful piece of land there that over time may be redeveloped into a true state of the art facility if we ever get an interested owner again. People fail to see that. There's life after Venky's, so why sell off our parting gifts from Jack to make their life easier now? Wake up and smell the coffee ffs.
-
This will be difficult to do yet. The planning application will only mention the land owner - Rovers - so it will take a leak to find out developers, Venus’ role etc. What does need some investigating is the similarities between management team at Coventry and here. The ultimate end result. Did they promise to reinvest the money gained at Cov? Is the same consultant involved? Sharpe has a lot to get his teeth into and he better do it otherwise I don’t think sections of this fan base will forgive him. As for the people happy about it they are selling themselves short. We were never consulted. Fans ARE the stakeholders of this club - without us there is no Blackburn Rovers so this idea we are indebted to Venkys is ridiculous. I’m not happy about it but I am at least slightly relieved the planning apps are linked and one development cannot be done without the other. My next concern moves to the facilities they plan to build. To date they haven’t done anything better than Jack....and he did it “30 years ago”. Time to change? I suspect not.
