broadsword

I can't believe I'm writing this, but Guy Ritchie is going to re-make The Wild Geese. God knows why, I don't think the original can be improved upon.

the first one was bad enough!

it looks like it's in an American prison?

Is Bronson out yet? God, I'd love to see that. Utter fruit bap yes, but a compelling character nonetheless.

I don't think he's taken steroids, but he was caught with HGH in Australia, last year I think it was. He looked very strange in Rambo, which I put down to HGH.

Saw Enigma last night, seen it before. But it's still a great film. Came out about 8 years ago, about teh code breakers at Bletchley. Reminds me of Eye of the Needle and 39 Steps in a strange way.

Ducking down an alley Thenodrog?

I watched Kung Fu hustle a few months back, thought it was absolutely hysterical

OK, my interest has been stimulated. Can someone tell me why organic food is a waste of money please? Please note that I am not a member of the Organic Food Front, so no need to get narky or condescending.

Ha! Well we'll agree to disagree. Harsh times was awful, totally awful, and goes into the same great big bin of rubbish as Indy 4, xxx2, Street Kings and a lot lot more. Maybe you liked the street slang?

3:10 to Yuma is a cracking film! Whereas Harsh Times is a complete load of old manure.

Saw Hancock last night, was in hysterics. funniest film I've seen since "In Bruges".

That one where they're dangling around on ropes, that got on my nerves. So contrived. And not at all exciting. Couple of action scenes ripped straight off from Bourne. I'd give it a 6/10 overall, whereas Casino Royale got 10/10. Too revisionist, too un-involving.

Watched United 93 last night, never seen it before. Excellent film, but I really shouldn't have watched it after a stressful day at work. it got me so bloody angry I sat there watching it with my fists clenched.

Good, and is it true that he wears a cardigan in this one? Watched Thunderball last night, where they've upgraded the picture, you could see the make-up covering Connery's tattoos.

Opinions are like assholes I guess. Going to see it this coming Friday. I do hope it's not going to be too like Bourne - Bond should have its own identity and not try to mimic other franchises. The guy in the Independent said it was, low on exposition and a series of mini-set pieces, swiftly moving onto the next one. He also said it's moved on in terms of M's office, she has some horrible clinical office, and he pined for the old days of bernard Lee's oak-panelled job. I knwo what he means, and I really don't like M being played by a woman, M should be a crusty old bloke with a pipe. Well, perhaps not that stereotyped.

Saw "In Bruges" last night, haven't laughed so much in bloody ages.

Just watched Salvador again on DVD. Very powerful film, difficult to watch at times.

Saw Indiana Jones 4 last night, what a total pile of crud. It was so totally awful George Lucas should be taken outside and shot immediately.

The point was that your archetypal "scrote", as defined by the "London Centric" media, isn't necessarily Northern, and is probably more likely to come from London as elsewhere.

Not seen the film, but can I just say that that sentence is total and utter tosh.

Never, ever, forgotten.

Behave yourself! :-)

That was one of the worst Bond films ever, easily. Right up there with "View to a Kill".

The later Brosnan films were just terrible full-stop. He only did one decent one and that was his first film. Not necessarily his fault though, the scripts were just plain awful. And John Cleese in a Bond film? No.