Jump to content

BRFCS

BY THE FANS, FOR THE FANS, SINCE 1996
Proudly partnered with TheTerraceStore.com

chaddyrovers

Members
  • Posts

    50000
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    8

Everything posted by chaddyrovers

  1. well if Mowbray has said this then I strongly disagree. Brereton is ready to play for me. I agree we need another striker if he wont play Brereton there. any names?
  2. disagree on Bell being bad all season or both being crap. Williams was awful yesterday. Yes I disagree with the team selected but the team Mowbray selected would have understandable if he played Armstrong up front and Palmer or Dack wide left. fair enough. Read Mowbray views on when he played that formation and understand it. Do you class Armstrong a wide player/striker or as a striker?
  3. we had 4 great chances 1st half half, and 3 second half which we scored 1. Yes you say poor prep when we lose but you don't come on when the prep has been excellent like home wins against Brentford and Leeds United Mowbray has mention trying to change us to passing style type of game which is fair enough but then players like Rodwell and Rothwell need to play. Dack is being man marked out of game. Pearson did a job on him yesterday If Armstrong is going to play wide then we are short but Brereton should be playing up front
  4. I didn't mind the team selected but why not play Armstrong up front and Palmer or Dack from wide left position I think Mulgrew overall fitness is better and hasn't Graham got a long term knee injury that he plays with? I agree isn't very annoying and difficult to accept not playing a striker when we have 3 strikers. But Mowbray did play this false 9 formation against Liverpool and I did wonder if this was going to Mowbray new thing. I feel Mowbray is being far too over cautious about not playing Brereton up front. why? I don't know I went twelve tellers then New Fleece Inn then Royal Consort before getting to the ground. no trouble in the pub but its was outside the guild hall. what happened I don't know but just seen as we came out of the Bookies near Guild Hall. Yes I left after the 4th goal went in I left and heading back to Preston Town hall Brereton's goal wasn't offside and the linesman cost us probably. If Graham isn't going to start then play Brereton there Graham hasn't trained most that 2 weeks so play Brereton or Armstrong not Dack or Palmer
  5. I disagree on that being the number 1 focus. But I think we need another striker if Graham isn't going to be match fit enough and not going start enough games I would play Brereton up front if Graham isn't fit
  6. Thats what I seen yesterday coming out of the bookies there. Dont know what it was about.
  7. I would send Palmer back and bring in a winger. I dont understand why he doesnt play Brereton up front if Graham isnt on the pitch. Moore is at Barnsley now. Main man there
  8. He took his goal well and wasnt offside. He tried hard, some good movement.
  9. I love Mowbray to bits but today he got it wrong at the start. If Graham wasnt fit enough then play Armstrong or Brereton there not Palmer. Its annoyed at kick off time seeing how they line up on the pitch
  10. my team Raya Nyambe Lenihan Mulgrew Bell Reed Evans Smallwood Rothwell Brereton Graham
  11. Matty, was all the questions answered by Waggott on the night? Did the Mowbray's part get involved in the questions for Waggott that's your opinion that the questions wasn't answered adequately but was they were answered in full
  12. we need a wide player with pace and centre defender. and send Palmer back to Chelsea
  13. cos it is on a number of points. work the rest out for yourself Stuart.
  14. very disappointed result today and the performance by some were nothing short of pathetic. Williams and Armstrong at fault for the 1st goal, Nyambe too slow for the 2nd goal, Williams so easy turned for the 3rd goal. Lenihan and Williams so poor today. How anyone can say Williams is better than Bell needs to watch Williams full performance today. He was useless. Even tho we were 2 down 1st half, we still have 4 great chances to score and we should have gone in level at half time. I was pleased with the Graham sub and it brought a positive outcome by his goal, but we didn't kick on enough for me. Thought Mowbray was far too slow taking Armstrong and Palmer who were truly awful. Dack had 2 or 3 chances he should have done better. His I have are getting worse and teams are marking so tightly and not allow him any time of the ball. Ive suggested him playing wide for a bit during the game to give him more room, cos he is being too easy marked for me. on the Formation and team selection, I have no idea why he played it or picked that team. I understand why he playing it and how but I disagree with it. Alot of police in the town centre before and after the game with a few kick offs between fans. some scenes were awful and total unnecessary to see and witnessed. Came home at 6.30pm cos of it.
  15. Thats your opinion Matty. I have a different one. All of the agenda was discussed. Not heard anyone from who attend complaining that Waggott or Cheston didnt answers any of the questions. So what the problem? What attention was taking away if all questions were answered?
  16. Depends how Lambert improves his side in January. It need some improvement. Some of Hurst expensive signings cant even get on bench. Disagree on Graham being excellent this season. Been poor recently for me. I like Lambert alot. He got 2 draws and performances were improvement. They need a win. I didnt expect that yesterday against a quality WBA side.
  17. Like I said before I am very aware why the meetings was set up for. IMO, Mowbray should be there. He plays a vital role within the club. Is Pasha even around with Mowbray and Waggott have direct line to Mrs D and Balaji?
  18. Gallagher cant score if the service isnt good enough like last season. You have use that excuse this season for Graham. I suggest him. Thats.it. tho im sure I seen Ipswich fan posted somewhere.he wants Gallagher. 2 games under Hurst plus read plenty about his time at Ipswich and the problems behind the scenes. @DE. has posted plenty about it.
  19. Gallagher was a suggestion. I do think Lambert will move for him. I dont think Ipswich need a player to hold the ball but a player can score goals. His record was decent considering we have Coyle for 6 months. They are playing much better than they did under Hurst. Plus lets give WBA some credit aswell. Like Barnes alot. Notice no Burke again for WBA tonight. Hope we are looking at him
  20. I suggest a couple of names. Thats all. Gallagher is going to drop his 24k a week wages if he is going to move. On Maddison, no championship club took him last summer. Why not after his good season. Only 2 reasons why, 1. wages demands or 2. Player attitude.
  21. Lambert has to get them till January where he can bring in a couple of quality players like a Sam Gallagher and a good winger like Maddison. Its going to be very tough for Ipswich to stay up
  22. Well I understand what these meeting are for but IMO, the manager should be there and given his views on the matters Mowbray has done since attending these meetings. What issues did Mowbray distract from? was all of the agenda discuss? where you there adding your opinion to the meeting?
  23. I know Mowbray has done it since he came in. He has said in previous interview
  24. West Brom have been good. Ipswich not got going tbf. or allow to either. one or 2 moments but poor final ball
  25. I understand it the first time but I not surprise you aren't attend. need to work to cover their betting loses. no thankyou. I have no desire to met you at football. I talk you on here and that's it thanks. I will be at all 3 games thanks
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.