https://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/blackburn-jon-dahl-tomasson-quit-32072088#amp-readmore-target Joke owners .

Waggott needs to go but the chanting should be aimed at the owners .Our focus being on Waggott or anyone else on the ground is more likely to keep them in the job than lose it under these parasites Plus it will be just be another Waggott when he eventually does leave we had Derek Shaw before him

Well the players have been informed our boos, chanting and discontent isn't about them so I hope winning ,drawing or losing we will be hearing plenty aimed at the owners and Waggott Even now we are still acting disgracefully...holding meetings without the head coach present ,it's obvious he is going so wtf is the hold up just pay the man off or waive your right to compensation if he takes another job in the next 16 months

Was JDT aware this meeting was taking place?

Waggott trying to save face .Would this meeting have taken place if there wasn't any chanting against Waggott and the owners on Saturday?I think not JDT Isnt even gone yet and holding supporters and players meetings with no involvement from the head coach Our club is being sunk lower every day

Elliot has said the club have denied that JDT has resigned or been sacked.

JDT leaving according to some tweet

On the owners behalf . But the reports suggest the only issue with the deal is we didn't submit it not that there was any issue with the paperwork , my point being if Broughton had checked all the paper work was in order then he should not have to follow the fella employed to submit it, a person who had submitted the other paperwork of the players signed.

The Venkys have probably taken the Wharton money to cover the money that has to be held against what the courts allowed them to send last time

Because what I'm saying is I don't believe the narrative,someone wether the owners ,Waggott whoever didn't want this deal going ahead and no I don't believe he should have to follow Silvester after contracts have been signed that does not happen at any other club if it is a case that it's just human error instead of my belief the papers weren't submitted on purpose, if you don't think Silvester is capable then you replace him if everything had been looked over and ready to be submitted then I just do not think he should have to follow Silvester to watch him do it,he could of had to been in talks with other players signed He could have easily asked Silvester ,Waggott whoever did everything get off ok and have been told yes.I don't think Broughton was sat twiddling his thumbs while all this was happening like Revidge suggests

I just find it too suspicious that this could happen three times and too convenient that it's the signings that cost a bit more than usual . Fleck was confirmed after and there wasn't a mention of his name all day.Have no issues with paperwork when it comes to the other deals Listen Iv said many times I do not think Broughton is doing an outstanding job in fairness some of our recruitment has been shocking but when he thought he had a better budget even not a decent one much better players were being targeted and last summer when money was spent then 2 hsve done very well and one average but not bad for a million and the signing players up to contracts (which wasn't happening before) have been good things .Like some blame him for the fact no experience was brought in in the summer If we had new owners in the morning I would want him replaced and a clean sweep across the board including JDT even tho I rate him big time and think he could do good things with backing , too much of the support base have their set opinion of him now He isn't responsible for it but since last summer £22.5+ Raya money incoming million worth of player sales has been brought into the club along with losing some higher wages and he has had probably just over £1 million pound to replace them If he goes under the current lot we will get equal or worse ,and I expect JDT knows more than us what went on and he did not mention Broughtons name

Probably in talks with Broughtons and JDTs replacements Anderson and Kean ,being convinced that they can get us promoted on much less of a budget we have now

Or someone at the club didn't want the deal to go through Listen 24 hours earlier Broughton was permanent bids for players but again lastminute.com Venky scum turn around and say no you can't have any of the Wharton money.Making his job even more impossible in trying to get the players the manager needs If you and others want to make GB the fall guy fair enough, but I ain't doing that and seemingly the head coach isn't either Again GB can't be expected to do every single thing on deadline day when other players other than McGuire needed to be brought in.All other deals fine but the one that looks like costing messes up cmon it is it's feck Broughton's fault

Like I said previously we still hadn't completed the fleck signing.They were trying to get other players In the door Was Ennis fully completed? He could have been doing a number of things ,taking calls from clubs enquiring about our players ,taking calls from clubs/agents offering players, contacting clubs asking about loans, negotiating with fleck . We dont hear about everything that happened on transfer deadline day but I'm pretty certain at other clubs the dofs ain't sat around submitting documents .Now if it turned out the documentation was filled out incorrectly then I would be putting blame on Broughton, but an error like clicking save instead of send, i dont think Broughton can be blamed for not believing someone would be stupid enough to do thst

Yeah but according to the athletic everything was correct with the paperwork it just wasn't sent off,someone clicked save instead of send I don't agree that's Broughton's responsibility,we were trying to get other players in aswell.If the paperwork was checked over and it's true that someone clicked save instead of send then the blame lies elsewhere for me. In saying that if I was Broughton I would leave of my own accord, budget slashed in summer and then being told you can't have any of the Wharton money after making bids for players earlier in the day.

We still had our other business to get done aswell Like how late in the day did Fleck sign? He can't be everywhere at once ,with respect at other clubs I doubt very much the dof, sporting director etc has to stand over and watch that everything is submitted correctly If it was the case that everything was correct regarding the paperwork with McGuire and it was just a case of the paperwork not being submitted then I personally do not hold Broughton responsible for that It's deadline day we had other deals to get done

People heard Friday JDT was leaving after the QPR match Rumours going around on Sunday that Broughton had resigned Both not true so with Respect to JB I'm sure he has heard 2 have left today but there probably is no truth to it.

I keep reading this "looking forward to what Gregg says" He isn't going to be able to be totally honest,if it's the owners fault etc we aint going to hear that from him. He also won't sit there explaining that they were told they couldn't make permanent signings at a late stage.

Probably because those deals fit In the tiny budget the owners signed off on The larger deals probably have to go through every single Rao family member and their multiple advisors

Or it's Broughton isn't responsible for it

People do resign when their position keeps on getting undermined We were making permanent bids for players on the Wednesday obviously the circumstances Broughton was working under changed on deadline day and it wouldn't surprise me at all when the cost of the loan deal for McGuire was revealed there was more interference

When asked about the McGuire deal why didn't JDT namedrop Broughton, if like you suggest it's Broughton's fault? As for your last paragraph, ok we didn't quite have it like O'Brien and McGuire in previous windows but how many times did we have players in the building on deadline day only for the deals to never materialise. I think your stance on Broughton is weird...fair enough you don't rate his recruitment I respect that but things like "on the owners gravy train" "he will be clinging on here forever" those statements are a load of nonsense to me. Broughton was following his career path interviewing here ,he wasnt headhunted ,he actually wasn't even offered the job first someone else was. Even on O'Brien as Dof he really shouldn't have to be standing over the person whose responsibility it was for the forms to be sent off on time and correctly. He is not the problem here.

When asked about the McGuire deal why didn't JDT namedrop Broughton, if like you suggest it's Broughton's fault? As for your last paragraph, ok we didn't quite have it like O'Brien and McGuire in previous windows but how many times did we have players in the building on deadline day only for the deals to never materialise. I think your stance on Broughton is weird...fair enough you don't rate his recruitment I respect that but things like "on the owners gravy train" "he will be clinging on here forever" those statements are a load of nonsense to me. Broughton was following his career path interviewing here ,he wasnt headhunted ,he actually wasn't even offered the job first someone else was. Even on O'Brien as Dof he really shouldn't have to be standing over the person whose responsibility it was for the forms to be sent off on time and correctly. He is not the problem here.

Well the manager doesn't think he is.Didnt hear him mentioning Broughton's name when asked about the McGuire situation.

A queue for Ole?Is that why he is still out of work 2 years after leaving united? He did shit at Cardiff