Jump to content

47er

Members
  • Posts

    23610
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    24

Everything posted by 47er

  1. So much better. Well done all !
  2. We are in terrible trouble if the summer transfer window doesn't go well. Upfront we were powder-puff lightweight, hardly put in a challenge as their defence took the ball away. Some attractive approach play but moves broke down when we got into the areas that matter. Only one shot on target the whole game! Stood and watched in some instances. If you're playing a better team surely you at least try to play a pressing game and deny them space and time? Wouldn't have happened with Hughes in charge and Todd on the park. We need 5-6 players ready to go straight into the first team and they should be big, tough bastards with a mean streak. Very sorry for the 600 who spent all that time and money getting there.
  3. Its a while since Dack was inconsistent.
  4. I keep asking for your's but you won't give them! I asked you two specific questions above and you responded to my post without addressing either! That's why every discussion with you just goes round and round to no purpose. If you don't think Brereton is a waste of money what is it about him that you can see and I can't see? Simple.
  5. Yes. It implies that certain individuals are good enough but need competition to get the best out of them. I would argue that they simply are not good enough and competition wouldn't fix it. We would end up with equal mediocrity on that basis.
  6. There's no pressure on us, we should go out there and play and try to ruin their party. Big chance to show what we can do on a big stage. No fear....
  7. Quotes from you: "I never once said it (BB's transfer fee) couldn't have been spent more effectively." "I don't think anyone at Ewood could argue they've seen enough of him to say he can't head a ball". Its all negatives isn't it? Pure avoidance technique. Has anyone at Ewood seen enough to say he can head he ball? If you never said the money couldn't have been spent more effectively, does that mean it could have been spent more effectively? Like wading through treacle with you.
  8. Well,(strikes Theresa May mode)---- now I know what you don't like, when will you tell me what you do like? There's nowt nuanced about me saying "waste of money" is there? You know where I stand. As Brereton's form has been disappointing, you've become more and more vague.
  9. Well what exactly did you argue? You're becoming very "nuanced" on the topic. Hard to know anymore. I know where I stand, it was a waste of money. You?
  10. Jesus, Biz, it doesn't take a genius to see that "of" should read "or". Your last sentence is ridiculous. Glad to see you admit now that the money could have been spent more effectively, that wasn't your attitude earlier on. "Hindsight" I guess!
  11. Further, since Brereton has hardly played at all, we could have done just as well without him. But if we'd spent that money on, say, 2 good defenders, wouldn't we have been much better off?
  12. Nobody has ever said that (as per usual!). For my part I've simply said he can't or doesn't head the ball. Is that a fair criticism or not? Its certainly a strange aptitude to lack for a tall striker costing £7M at such a young age.
  13. Biz very generous to the usual suspects!!!!
  14. You're probably only worth £4M then!
  15. That occurred to me! TM didn't seem to react strongly to that bad run and, at the time, I couldn't see it ending.
  16. On Brereton can we agree that he's not much good in the air and that it is not likely to be a major source of goals for him or for us? Simply adds to the mystery for me.
  17. Definitely a candidate for Most Arrogant Post of the Year!
  18. Those 3 clubs all sacked him though, that's the way of it eventually. But I agree we are in a better place now thanks to him but also to Damien Johnson (and Dunny).
  19. You're a big Strawman inventor, I never said "his game had to revolve around heading" anymore than I said "he wasn't brilliant with his head" in the first post! Speaking of posts, you keep shifting them!
  20. Yes, now you come to mention it! But its still an asset associated with a tall striker! Unless somebody comes up with dozens I'm standing my ground!
  21. But its an important asset for a striker! C'mn! How many did Shearer score with his head? And I didn't say BB wasn't brilliant with his head----I said he can't head it! Big difference! Jimmy Greaves was a prolific striker and I don't remember him heading it much but he was a little bloke! What use is it being tall without heading the ball? Which tall strikers had brilliant careers and couldn't/wouldn't head it?
  22. Tallest player but can't head it! Long way to go.
×
×
  • Create New...