rigger

Or even training sessions.

But sometimes circumstances mean you have to adapt and make the best of a bad job. That is when a manager earns his money.

Can you imagine if JDT offered Adam Wharton as a straight swap for Morton. I think Liverpool would snatch our hands off.

Not at championship level.

If I had a choice of who will have the better career, between Edun and Mola. I would go for Mola.

I think the answer to your first question is that people are discussing other options. What people refer to as a plan B. I wouldn't rate a 10 goal per season striker, as decent at any level. Because he doesn't rate Garrett.

Edun is below average, for a professional player at championship level. I could not even say what Eduns best position is. I have seen him play with the U21s and personally I am not impressed.

Balls leading to deep penetration.

I think what roverstillidie meant, is that Pears form has sod all to do with Morton being picked, so why did you mention it.

I don't think even Chaddy believes that Morton is good for our team. I think Chaddy just agrees with everything JDT says.

In my opinion both Garrett and Adam Wharton are more use to us, in our situation, than Morton.

I do know what JDT has said in the past. What I am saying is that it doesn't seem to apply to Morton. If JDT and his staff are happy with Mortons performances, then I would say they are in the wrong jobs. I know as someone who pays money to watch those performances, I am not happy with Morton.

There should not be a hope in hell, that he plays for the Rovers first team.

That doesn't seem to be the case with Morton. That is my take on the amount of playing time Morton has been selected for.

Long may it continue.

Morton may well be good when surrounded by players above the quality we have at the Rovers. But that is of no use to us, in our present situation.

We will be a stronger and more effective squad next season, with not having Morton available.

A lot depends on which players are selected to pad out first team squads. Except for City.

In my opinion we need to be playing three midfielders in midfield. Not two and two wide players. I would play, 3 central defenders, 3 central midfielders, 2 wing-backs, two central forwards. Just my opinion.

But the discussion was about IF we played a formation that tried Szmodics and Dack as a front partnership. What could be known as a Plan B.

I have already got my Norwich ticket. My quandary is, do I get a Huddersfield ticket.

Because we need three in midfield. What we have tried to do is ask one of the forwards to drop back to supplement our midfield two. If as Mike E suggested we could try, Szmodic in front of Dack as the forwards, then we would need an extra central midfielder. I will say yet again, that I believe you have to win the midfield battle, to win games in the modern way of playing

If we played Szmodic and Dack up front, then we would have to play three central midfielders. It could be worth a try.

Not a very good advert to sell next seasons, season-tickets.

Rovers U21s three-one up, substitute Sam Burns scores. Ten minutes of injury time.