And yet, I would bet that if we progress and get an away tie, season ticket holders will get a higher priority on tickets than people who have bought tickets for the Brum game.

Yes to both questions

There is no "ressies" now. I would play players who want to play for Blackburn Rovers. This is my personal opinion, the beauty of living in a democracy is that I don't have to justify my opinion to anyone, all I have to do is live with it.

But your outcomes are fiction, the results could just as easily gone another way.

From what I have seen this season his contribution has not been so impressive. The manager is told that a player is not available because of his contract stance. I would be more surprised if the manager rails against the decision of his direct boss .

As it stands we will get nothing, If Diaz refused to sign, and was dropped we would get nothing, I don't see much difference. But there would always be the chance that if Diaz was not being picked he may have changed his mind about signing a contract, even if it was only to get a move. What other clubs do has no relevance to how Rovers should act.

What Broughton could have said is sign a new contract or don't play.

As a crowd entertainer just watch the video of Tugays pre match warm-up against Newcastle at Ewood.

They would if they were the ones available.

At least he wasn't our No1 target !

The problem being that you never feel the rovers should be criticised.

So is Gally.

Delivered to the wrong address ?

The only fans reaction that would be noticed, would be if a large percentage of the 8000 season ticket holders did not renew, and Waggot didn't achieve his target next season.

everything

Todays U21s game against Posh is a game with nothing at stake. We have already qualified, but can't catch the team above us. Posh can't qualify. Most of our better players won't be risked, yet Lancashire FA in their wisdom are charging £5 to get in on a Wednesday afternoon. Utter madness.

The way I look at the Diaz situation is. Are we going up with or without Diaz, probably not. If Diaz has signed a pre contract agreement with another club, then I would play who ever we have got, who will be playing for us next season. If Diaz does not want to play for the Rovers, then grant his wish and don't pick him. In fact I wouldn't even have him in the U21s. We are Blackburn Rovers, not a facility for keeping other clubs players fit. I know it won't happen, but it is what I would do. If on the other hand Diaz hasn't signed a pre contract agreement, then I would more than welcome him in our first team.

And Alan Shearer.

The fact is we lost 4-0 to a poor team. For me it is not whether Dack bust a gut or not. It is the fact that the system didn't work. So I would try a different system, rather than the same system with different players . Sadly Dack is not suited to the system I would play, that is why I would have him on the bench.

I would go with, three center-backs, two wing-backs, three center midfielders, and two central strikers KAMINSKI HYAM AYALA WHARTON JRC PICKERING GARRET WHARTON BUCKLEY MARKANDAY GALLAGHER

Yes mainly lesser clubs who cannot afford to keep the players themselves. But with central strikers there are very few of these players compared to the amount of clubs. That is why I don't think it is particularly strange that the Rovers haven't produced their own central striker.

Most successful teams buy in their center forwards. There will be examples against this, but not that many.

I enjoy going for a beer before and after games, this usually means I catch the train to both home and away games. Rail strikes and games switching away from Saturday 15;00 kick-offs mean train journeys have become awkward. This season I have been to the least games, in the last 50 years. I don't even watch the televised games, as we have become so boring to watch.

I watched the snooker as well.

A Hollands pie, in clogs.