To me it is not five at the back. It is three at the back with two wing-backs flanking the midfield. Ideal against ten men. If the five in midfield know what to do. This should be another thing that is worked on in training. But our poor results would seem to tell a different story.

If Diaz can't play or train, I don't see anything wrong with him taking a holiday.

I think that result ends our automatic promotion hopes, we arestill in with a chance of the play-offs.

We are shit at throw-ins at every level of the club.

It's still there.

I think it is more of a case of ,Dack was a proven Championship goalscorer, let's hope he still is.

I think it might have gone more like : REF- It's 12:15 I am not too happy with the amount of water under the snow, do you think that it will be gone by 14:15. SWAG - I'll look into it. REF - It's 14:15 and the pitch is exactly the same, the game is off. SWAG - But we did all we could. Would you like a pie for your journey home ?

Opinions, eh!

I was going to post the same.

The same could be said of Vale, why not have him on the bench ?

Having seen Dack for the U23s, I doubt he is ready yet. I hope I am proved wrong.

So when will the minutes of last nights meeting be available to the general public.

I have been through this arguement before, so I won't go over old ground. But he has appeared in 7 of the last 9 Rovers games, and has not scored.

Isn't talking to yourself a sign of madness.

It will probably be months till the minutes are published. Most questions will have been forgotten about.

Lets have another look on Monday. It could be a tough game against West Ham.

From what I have seen of Dack in the U23s, he won't be returning and winning us games, any time soon.

Unlike the dingles we have never been in the graveyard.

But he has been playing during our recent lack of goals.

It's not so much the point for us, but more the two points not gained by Sheff Utd, that would make a draw hugh.

No, but if the problem with drainage is a known problem that hasn't been addressed, the only people to blame are the club.

At least he got to twenty goals, so the bets were paid out.

Personally I would like to know if the ref called it off due to the pitch being waterlogged, and if this was the case, was that due to bad drainage. If bad drainage is the fault and it was previously known about, then it is down to the club. A danger to the players is not a reason, it is an outcome.

No, what I am saying is the only person who's decision matters is the refs, as he is the one who has been tasked to make the decision. What needs clarifying, are his reasons for calling off the game and what factors lead to these reasons.

There is more chance of plaiting sawdust, than a cheap game now. There is maybe one way, and that would be, if nobody bought the final five ticket.