rigger

It wasn't.

I thought you said in an earlier post, that it was going to be your last post, you little fibber.

So you do agree, you can remove subjectivity. All we need to agree about now is, should subjectivity be removed

I am glad you agree.

Until players stop trying to bend the rules (cheating), decissions will be subjective. Some people will agree with them, others won't.

Most players will try to take any interpritation to the limit, this puts the refs on the spot (no pun intended). I have never known a player with the ball thinking, I know I'll hit the other player on the arm with the ball, and get a free kick. So no, I think any contact ball to arm should be penalised.

You've got to be Krul to be kind in the right measure.

And Southgate.

When are the fixture changes due to TV coverage announced ?

In my simple world, the most important point would be. Is what is said true, not who said it.

In your opinion it matters, in mine it doesn't.

It doesn't matter who said what. No monies have been sent, and as the old adage says, Actions speak louder than words.

It doesn't matter what players we miss out on. What matters is the quality of the ones we do get.

It will be our under 18's, if the friendly goes ahead.

You would have thought that would have been lesson number one, in the shadowing of Waggot.

He could well be both.

It is the questions that weren't approved, that are of more interest.

Well it made me cheer/laugh.

Well you should do.

I was on about the Rovers.

The fixtures are out tomorrow, so that is something to look forwards to.

Did you consider yourself an adult at that stage. I hope your masters was not in accounting. Did you buy a season ticket that year ?

I think the point was that 23 year olds, are adults.

So means test the cheap tickets, don't just give them to everyone of a certain age.

Much the same as what our Gally adds to the Rovers.