Yep. 7 goals from 30 appearances from midfield sounds very impressive on the face of it. Especially if things haven't been going well for him up there. If he thinks he's swapping a basket case Club for one run properly he's going to be sorely disappointed however.

Yep. If the likes of Myers and Jackson are to be believed it sounds a long way from being cut and dried.

We were linked to him when Broughton was DOF and the mooted fee then was £3-£4m I think. Saw an article online saying we were waiting for the Owners to give the green light to the deal. What could possibly go wrong with that? If it does go through, hope he does better than the last midfielder we signed from Rangers (wee Barry) who cost £7m then decided he was homesick a few months later culminating in us almost having to give him back to Rangers. Can only see this one being either an absolutely inspired piece of business or a complete disaster. Don't think they'll be any middle ground with it.

Oh dear. That's the end of that one then.

He clearly insinuated that information came from Waggott himself.

The LT headline said we were "prioritising" the signing of 3 keepers. Which is a contradiction in terms in itself. Personally I don't think young Elliott has the faintest idea what's happening at the Club. If others of you enjoy what he writes, each to their own, that's fine.

How did we know that was going to happen? Incredibly convenient. (For Waggott)

Why, has it gone through?

So ( been dipping in and out this morning) are we any nearer to making an actual signing or is it still smoke and mirrors, rumour and conjecture?

Disagree. Brittain is shite. Although as Exiled says it'll probably be a squad filler to pad out the squad rather than someone to start at RB.

Might be lost in translation but if not we did the same with Mcguire didn't we - get him on a plane then change the goal posts whilst he was over the Atlantic. At least Cantwell hasn't got as far to travel back if we're pissing about.

Surprised to see people thought Buckley had a decent game tonight. I thought he was terrible and is regressing at a rate of knots. JRC I never really saw the fuss about in the first place so I'm less surprised about that but Buckley......... he has a lot of natural talent. Was it Stoke away in the first half of Mowbray's last season when he ran the show? Unrecognisable now.

He didn't exactly have a lot of competition. We barely won a game in the second half of that season and he was as bad as everyone else.

Lol. I honestly thought it was lunchtime Sunday. After tonight I still may tune in then!

18 months. Otherwise, completely agree.

I don't place any blame on Eustace for the substitutions. We were doing the square root of fuck all before the subs anyway and it was up to the players who came on the pitch to perform. I do blame him that in general they weren't up for it. That was a real Mowbray like Cup performance. All momentum killed stone dead. We'll get absolutely battered on Sunday now.

Never a foul in a million years. He's soft as **** like the rest of them. Players like JRC and Buckley are going to have to decide which way they want to go now and pull their finger out or they're going to disappear without trace. Sigurdsson's no better either.

JRC is so over-rated and this season he's been beyond woeful. Get rid.

Pears isnt good enough but tonight is nothing whatsoever to do with him. You're getting even more boring on that than when you used to blame the referee every week for us getting beaten.

Ditto. I think Vale and Duru have shown up very well. The rest of them - blimey. Very poor half I don't think I've ever seen Sigurdsson play well. He doesn't even stand out against this level of opposition.

This.

He's already answered that in the affirmative hasn't he?

I think you're absolutely spot on with the legal interpretation. As regards the statement attached to the accounts they simply CAN'T say "We can put money in if we want to, we just don't want to under the current conditions" can they? I think that they've just inserted as nebulous a statement in as they can to create confusion which at the same time will just about allow the accounts to be signed off.

Thanks for clarifying. So no relevance to us then?

Sounds like one to be avoided. Seemingly a fairly questionable attitude in general plus would the player himself be buzzing at the prospect of a move he would probably perceive as a backwards one?