All Activity

And do something far more ridiculous and illogical than just finishing the game? I don't know why you're persisting with this one beyond sheer bloody mindedness or trolling. I don't wish to be rude but it has been thoroughly deconstructed as a very bad suggestion. I've no issue with you as a poster but hardly anything you've said on this matter makes sense.

Great to see Ismael coming out and saying that he never agreed with the referee decision and that point of his report is wrong. So why did the ref say he did? Why has lied in his report? It was all McKenna and Ipswich were wanting the game calling out for these reasons, they were losing, down to 10 men and Rovers were controlling that game. Nothing in his team favour.

Sometimes there is a need to be radical 🙂

Lol, "there is widespread support for the idea among club bosses, Sky Sports News has been told", yeah, no shit. It makes the competition a bit of a joke though. Last season the team in 8th finished 22 points behind the team in 3rd, and 17 points ahead of the team in 22nd. The idea that it will lead to less dead rubbers is somewhat flawed in that it gives teams who are clearly going to finish between 3rd and 8th less reason to field full strength squads at the end of the season, particularly if they have little chance of getting automatics.

51 pages and still no signings. What a joke..

Apart from the fookin John Bulls anything else cooking on the protest front?

Showing how thick they are as per usual. As if venkys would try to bring in fans.

Id have thought the only 2 options being considered would be full replay or part replay.

Madness - House Of Fun

From the Dingles Website,it made me smile from a bunch of fuckwits...

Nope, but in declaring a partially played game to be a result and changing the number of points awarded for that result, the league would set two incredibly dangerous precedents. Ordering the rest of the game to be played would, I believe, be adhering to as many of their own regulations as possible... Apart from replaying the game entirely, which I've already stated I think will happen. Just of all the the possible outcomes, your suggestion is the most unlikely of all those that I've read.

51 pages has to be the record for a match thread.

Can you point to an example this is based on, are there any ? It's black and white to them so everyone needs to stop kidding themselves. Result or replay and a show of hands.

Twice now.

I would argue that it's multiple orders of magnitude more likely that the EFL order the rest of the match be played than declare Rovers to be the winners but only award one point.

Oh but it is because just like my 'crazy' scenario it isn't going to happen, ever.

The only people that have done anything wrong in this situation, are the Rovers management, who have done nothing about a known problem, hoping that it would never arise, well it has.

It's the best way to .maintain the integrity of the Competition. If Ipswich understandably decide its not worth the risk travelling 500 miles to play 15 mins from a goal down with 10 men then thats fair enough but it should be their choice. It should be at our expense though as it's not their fault the game was called off.

Sure, but that was my point. The two possible outcomes as I see it are full replay or partial replay, with the former being far, far more likely. Anything else would likely fall outside of regulations.

It's really not.

I think the game will be fully replayed. However I don't get that argument. They'll be doing a 500 mile round trip for 90 minutes too. They have to do that trip again either way. Only way to avoid it is give us the 3 points.

In devil's advocate mode, potentially they're opening themselves up for a lot more litigation from other teams by ordering a full replay and giving Ipswich a decent chance of winning 3 points than by replaying part of the game which probably wouldn't result in them getting any more than a point at best or ordering the result stands.

I never mentioned points awarded

No more laughable than the pure fantasy on here that the EFL would somehow consider ordering Ipswich on a 500 mile round trek to Blackburn to play 10-15 mins of 10v11.

Changes to points awarded for a result would fall outside of that, surely. Sheffield United and Nottingham Forest are two that I can think of that have recently either threatened or started legal proceedings against leagues that will likely believe they were acting within their regulations.