Jump to content

BRFCS

BY THE FANS, FOR THE FANS, SINCE 1996
Proudly partnered with TheTerraceStore.com

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. He did ok for Peterborough a couple of years ago, think he was in their Championship squad with Szmodics etc) cant imagine Rovers would be looking for another centre back unless they lose one (Hyam due to his contract maybe?) though
  3. Josh knight (English defender) is going cheap from Hannover 96. He will probably end up at a championship club. Never seen him play but the fans liked him. New manager has a different style of play and he doesn't fit in
  4. Obviously you don't go to Ewood, must be your imagination, he definitely played.
  5. It "makes sense" now that Gristedes original 5 areas has been slimed down, and a striker is "no longer wanted", Just a RW and Travis replacement Had Brittain/Travis not left/leaving, they wouldn't have been needing replacing, so a striker might have still been on the cards Obviously the sane & sensible thing would have been to see that we had received some transfer income & spent some of it But sales do not impact income for some unfathomable reason
  6. Even if it would take 1 minute of football to put Mafoumbi on, if hes nowhere near good enough. It means taking up a space on the bench that could go to someone else who actually could contribute, it means saving a sub (and one of 3 potential windows) to potentially use him, and if there is one goal either way or if the game is level you are then prioritising registration technicalities over the game. And its a bit humiliating for him to do that and then he goes back to being in and out at under 21 level. I wouldnt be comfortable doing that. Should just have been paid up at the start of the summer as an acceptance that we should never have signed him.
  7. This has already been widely discussed on here by our 2 resident experts Wilesden Rover and KentExile and that seems to be their consensus. We're less sure if anyone at the Club is aware of this but they should be by now if they keep tabs on this Forum.
  8. I reckon there would be some bonus he would be due if he were to make a senior appearance as it’s the only real reason why we considered/did this already
  9. Seems a very odd thing not to do. Albeit would probably require us doing some paperwork, which we’re incapable of doing.
  10. Totally crazy and two in their right mind accepts that? It is like a store selling all of their stock and not buying any to replace it, so just let the place fizzle out and go bump.
  11. Do Rovers have you doing the paperwork? Is that why there’s always wrong names on there?
  12. true Doesn't even have to be a minute
  13. I mean the most insane element of it is that at the same time touting a player trading model like Brentford/Brighton, Suhail states that he has never asked the owners about reinvesting transfer funds when players are sold.
  14. I saw on Twitter someone saying that if Mafoumbi plays 1 minute of league football for us, he would qualify for a permit and we could move his ESC spot. Not sure how true that is - does anyone know?
  15. It is insane, without wishing to defend them maybe that batshit crazy policy was imposed to cover situations where we had the windfall sale of a particularly valuable player like Wharton or Szmodics with the thinking being the budget for the following season could be upped slightly. It's a bit different when at least half the starting X1 are just walking out for relatively modest fees. There has at least been some acknowledgement now that we need a RW and replacements for anyone else who leaves albeit we're still waiting and anyone who comes in will probably be a lot cheaper and theoretically inferior.
  16. Jesus,this thread will be hot post Match if we lose...the tension is building!
  17. Why would you have any faith in Gestede to learn lessons? Do you have any faith in him? There were obviously slots available. My point is, for a club with seemingly grand plans of looking abroad, knowing that a lot of players will subsequently need these slots, especially at the prices we are paying, you wouldn't tie any up for players who arent first teamers.
  18. Glen on the podcast was told that the budget was set. It was set on the basis of not needing to make any sales. However, it was subsequently asked whether there was an agreement with owners to reinvest the funds of any player sales. Suhail said there was no agreement and he had never asked that question. It's insane - Β£5m and that may need to cover 4/5 players or 11 first team players based on sales...but any income is irrelevant.
  19. I dont know so I'm speculating but the way Gestede described it, it sounds like the transfer budget is "X" regardless of whether we make any sales or not. If we do happen to make any sales those funds go back to the owners and are not made available for reinvestment in the side. Doesn't make any sense whatsoever but then what does under this regime?
  20. The error the club made was not sticking him on the bench in the first few weeks of last season and giving him his debut, therefore meaning he would have earned a standard work permit last January
  21. Signed under Eustace then loaned now a new manager never been given even efl cup game people can debate the ability all they want but the fact he was called a hotshot etc and never even given cup minutes is very very strange and now because he has that slot he is the one getting the boot…..or alternatively we could put him on 1min this sat afternoon and get the slot and keep him and loan him again
  22. Had the Mafoumbi signing taken up the final slot, i'd then agree with you. However, correct me if i'm wrong, there were other slots available at the time so in order to bring in a potential talent, they gave him a slot. Had we refused and a rival club came in and done the same and Mafoumbi went on to become a big talent, we'd be frustrated at the club for not giving it a go. The situation now is that he was given a chance, it hasn't worked out, we're releasing him to make the slot free. I don't really know what else the club could have done in this situation other than what they've done.
  23. Reckon that's where the staff will be told to bring torches, soap, water and a coat in future as we've switched off utilities to save money.
  24. It's actually essentially Β£30 with a Β£10 charge per name. I looked at the 2 & 3 name options for myself and my daughter and then thought about my Dad as well, they're both Β£50 & Β£60 respectively! FOV
  25. Underneath the ad for the book another message informing us "Club shop to close early at 12p.m tomorrow for "staff event". Yep celebrate Blackburn Rovers in it's 150th year folks!
  1. Load more activity


Γ—
Γ—
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.