For me standard procedure for consultation meetings is that a secretary is appointed to write the minutes and a number of people appointed to “ratify/adjust” them prior to signing/publication. Dependent on the number of attendees and organizations represented then the number varies between 2 - 6. It is fairly normal for some attendees to feel that certain things were missed IF the meeting was not following a precirculated agenda. I have also experienced a situation where minutes could not be agreed. In that instance it was agreed that each representative was free to brief their organization and members whilst the minutes simply confirmed that discussions took place without consensus being found on formulating the results/answers. In instances where disagreements/confrontations took place then it was commonplace to use the euphemism “lively debate” It has usually been the phrase “was not able to provide an answer that satisfied the participants” that has been used to highlight the source of the issues without giving them the option of questioning the quotes.

Their ITK who posted it has ‘unleaded’ level status on there by the looks of it. I’d guess Travis or Myoshi

yet Hundred from Root and Brook got us into a great chance of winning that game otherwise we were nowhere

Travis - he blows hot and cold, usually starts the season incredibly then tails off. Tronstad is far more consistent and important to us (on the pitch). That said, both are solid Championship midfielders so I’d rather not lose them to a rival, nor on a free transfer next year

That Championship appearances stat is scary.

Might have a flutter on Brum this season

Travis - he blows hot and cold, usually starts the season incredibly then tails off. Tronstad is far more consistent and important to us (on the pitch). That said, both are solid Championship midfielders so I’d rather not lose them to a rival, nor on a free transfer next year

One thing sure if Travis leaves let's pray that Dom Hyam doesn't take the armband.

I see the so called experts on the BBC football website have predicted us finishing 23rd. https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/c5y2g678k6xo

Stockpiling?

🤣 Please can you buy me a lottery ticket.

Because he’s far more experienced than Brook, something you can’t put a price on.

In a football sense it's probably not that hard to replace Trav but you can't buy instantly the other stuff he brings and with so many changes this summer it's more vital than ever to have someone pulling it all together on and off the park.

End of that then for us.

Hopefully he'll want to link up with his countryman here

They come out the blocks at us i expect but that might suit big Vals Rovers if he's trying to recreate the Barnsley effect here although losing CB is a blow to that. If we get the defence/counter balance right we might get something although i do worry about the Hyam and new lad partnership. WBA 2 Rovers 2

Yes he did at Brum

I had the same thought

Did Miyoshi play under Eustace? If so then that makes sense.

I’ve seen that some of the Derby ITKs haven’t named the player but have said we’ll be annoyed. My guess is it’s Miyoshi.

The Derby lot running around giving it large on X have gone quiet recently. Especially the few that i had to point out to that Brittain begged for Boro over them, Dolan snubbed them for some warm weather, Travis was seeing out his contract and in reality all they'd got from us was two guys who never really got offered proper contracts here 🤣 Not as massive as they thought they were. Nothing against Derby, good club, big club and i like Eustace, Batth and Weimann but man i hope they flop next season they are followed by the biggest bunch of clowns since Coventry rose from the dead.

travis.sonny is vital to us

But not stocking up on strikers, you need to score goals to win matches.

They don't need the transfer market, just come to Ewood and buy the team.

I hear rovers are interested in Miohoshi, a step in the right direction, strengthen our attack.