All Activity

Supposed to have been processed and unveiled to pretty much 99% of readers would mean the deal was done - processed means all actions have been taken the second post then says close meaning the first post/source was wrong as nothing has been processed ready to unveil is that so difficult to understand?

Wdym. I've put the source as to where I got the TGH and Baradji news from. None of that is mine. It's clearly stated.

I think it's trying to say that they're negotiating his contract terms and stuff. Not the price cause that's fixed or it could be negotiating how we spread out the bonuses and what for. This is just my opinion cause it's my tweet but not my report so I can't 100% be sure

Look it's obvious you're just hedging your bets to try and make out you're ITK. Every man and his dog knows we need forwards and it's almost certain we'll get at least one (whether they're any good or not remains to be seen). As I say law of averages dictates you'll get lucky one day and get one right, but up to now its still never happened. Odd behaviour.

I have done the above, I cannot find the free ticket option.

Supporters who purchased tickets for the original fixture can claim a free ticket for this game by logging onto their e-ticketing account and selecting the FREE ticket.

It would have to be a donkey-derby.

Because he'll be Tronstad's replacement more than likely.....which we do need, but he's absolutely nowhere near the same standard, so essentially just another example of running the club into the ground. Don't get me wrong, GH is a steady squad player, but if he's one of the first names on the team sheet it highlights a rather large problem, again.

Not for the first time.

I have just tried to do this but I cannot find the free tickets on the Rovers site.

Eurhythmics - Sweet Dreams

What's all this lefty slagging? What does dexterity have to do with anything. I think the opposition to the boycott is summed up with this comment: "Nope. I’ll protest by all means but I’m not missing watching MY Rovers." As with most if not all of the other opposition to it, they've made the issue all about themselves. I see chaddy is a senior member on there. Hopefully he'll stay there for good.

This should be turned into a published book, I'm sure there are thousands more that could share their stories of the raw pain that has been caused by the owners and those around them. A book could potentially gain some traction and attention and get our feelings/experiences out into the wider world. I'd happily get the ball rolling by collecting and archiving the raw materials (the stories).

If we were properly organised as a fanbase the best thing to do would have been to get the free tickets then not show up. Alas, we've got supposed grown ups having a cry because they've been asked to take some responsibility for improving their community.

Says everything about Rovers' scouting when we missed both Mariner and Vardy!!! Think Rafferty is a few years older than Mariner and played for Coventry and then Blackpool before heading to Home Park.

Most of the posts on this thread fill me with sorrow. So much enthusiasm, fun, hope, camaraderie, spirit, excitement and pride has been eroded away over these last 15 years. But please don't give up, get angry instead. Take action. One day we will get our club back

Wonder if Abbey posts on there. He'll sort them out

We're On the left

They’re not big fans of the forum are they? Are they old members that have been banned or have they left in a huff?

Calm down, I wasn't giving you shit. I was just asking if you still believed that, or if the info you're saying you heard has changed your mind on that.

If it includes an extra year, it would essentially be a three and a half year deal, as I assume we are talking 2 years from the pending summer. Which is more palatable, though I'd still say it should be a three year with an option, which is a max 4 and a half year deal. The first part of the loan really doesn't count. He was injured for the majority of it, and not yet our player. Signing him now is more like how renewing a contract would work in terms of the deal length you'd offer, you wouldn't be thinking about their previous time of service, you go from the point of the new contract kicking in, which is now. And you wouldn't give a 2.5 year deal to a player with his profile unless your hand was forced. As I say, 3.5 including an option is more agreeable and no longer ridiculous, but not what I'd have done.

"I think this window there will be a net trading surplus on player trading" - what do you think this means? It simply means we will sell players for more money than we spend on new signings! It DOES NOT mean we WILL NOT sign any new players! Are we clear now?

Tbf - think that was an old story that was dug up for illustrative purposes and hopefully his wages will put paid to any move.

Now you're saying we have a striker about to sign, have you changed your mind on all this from 8 hours ago?

Why waste money on a bang average player like Gardner-hickman when we desperately need it for a striker