Darwen Rover Posted May 30, 2010 Posted May 30, 2010 Sam stated he wanted business completed before the start of the world cup, so how does being on holiday help that?? Also 9 days to go and not a sniff of an incoming transfer, trust in Sam, of course but will be interesting to see what happens; got a feeling our business will be done after teams have been knocked out the world cup as right now must be diff to get hold of them.
This thread is brought to you by theterracestore.com Enter code `BRFCS` at checkout for an exclusive discount!
John Posted May 30, 2010 Posted May 30, 2010 A lot of Premier League managers are on holiday at the moment, chill.
bluebruce Posted May 30, 2010 Posted May 30, 2010 Wasn't there a whisper about this guy in January ? http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2010/may/30/jong-tae-se-north-korea-wayne-rooney Interesting part of that article which could always be handy if he's a good player... "I want to play in England. When I was at high school, Italy's Serie A was the most popular league but with the help of cable television, I started watching English football and I really enjoyed the stadiums, the atmosphere and the passion. Years ago, I used to train wearing a Blackburn Rovers shirt." Was this a common sight? "I don't think so," he says, laughing. "In Japan, there were not many people wearing Blackburn shirts. I just went to the shop and bought one because I liked it."
alexanders Posted May 31, 2010 Posted May 31, 2010 Can anybody give John Williams / Sam Allardyce a message with the name Simon Vukcevic and Free Transfer on it. Looked very handi in the national against Norway this weekend. Would suit a 5 man midfield as winger or in the centre and as an attacker in a 4-3-3. Good pace and technique and willing to take on his man. Is fairly young and has a potential resale value.
brian_gallagher85 Posted May 31, 2010 Posted May 31, 2010 The Sunday Mail (the scottish paper) had him signing for some random Turkish side yesterday in a deal worth 2.5million for the player.
Ricky Posted May 31, 2010 Posted May 31, 2010 Think that was shota arveladze's team. Think he'd rather a crack at the prem.
Bobby G Posted May 31, 2010 Posted May 31, 2010 With a strike ratio like his, on a free transfer, I wouldnt be against it.
Guest roverspogges Posted May 31, 2010 Posted May 31, 2010 "potential re-sale value" I hate hearing those words even though it's true.
Ricky Posted May 31, 2010 Posted May 31, 2010 I'm warming to the idea bobby. When you see our list of targets so far including benjani and Beattie you have to think Boyd would be a better option. He has age on his side and if things didn't work out he'd be easy enough to sell on to a championship club as his wage demands are not rediculous for a prem forward. His goal ratio is excellent, I know there will always be arguments about the standard of the Scottish league but he has to still put the chances away. His strike rate at international level isn't bad either.
Bobby G Posted May 31, 2010 Posted May 31, 2010 Goalscorers of his type score scrappy goals. They are poachers. It wouldnt matter if he plays in the PL or somewhere else I think. I should say it matters less. He is a penalty box player. Id say on a free transfer, worth taking a chance on.
alexanders Posted May 31, 2010 Posted May 31, 2010 Henrik Larsson came from the SPL as well. He went on to become striker for FC Barcelona. I wouldn't mind Boyd in the squad for next season.
McClarky Posted May 31, 2010 Posted May 31, 2010 I'm warming to the idea bobby. When you see our list of targets so far including benjani and Beattie you have to think Boyd would be a better option. He has age on his side and if things didn't work out he'd be easy enough to sell on to a championship club as his wage demands are not rediculous for a prem forward. His goal ratio is excellent, I know there will always be arguments about the standard of the Scottish league but he has to still put the chances away. His strike rate at international level isn't bad either. Boyd is a very poor player though. At least Beattie has done it at this level, if sparadically. I doubt Boyd would do anything, he couldn't trap a bag of cement and not even Rangers rate him that nmuch as he is often left out. Then agin, I said the same about Steven Fletcher last summer and he did OK. Henrik Larsson came from the SPL as well. He went on to become striker for FC Barcelona. I wouldn't mind Boyd in the squad for next season. Please, because they played in the same league doesn't mean you can compare them. It's like comparing Ashley Ward and Alan Shearer, some respect for Larsson is due I think.
alexanders Posted May 31, 2010 Posted May 31, 2010 Of course you can compare them. Slightly same goal ratio in the same league.
magicalmortensleftpeg Posted May 31, 2010 Posted May 31, 2010 Of course you can compare them. Slightly same goal ratio in the same league. Thus proving that statistics dont mean a great deal when it comes to comparing different players.
Kelbo Posted May 31, 2010 Posted May 31, 2010 Goalscorers of his type score scrappy goals. They are poachers. It wouldnt matter if he plays in the PL or somewhere else I think. I should say it matters less. He is a penalty box player. Id say on a free transfer, worth taking a chance on. But do we get the balls in the right areas for him to score, Kalinic would score the chances he takes! I could be wrong, I just dont see how he would fit into the pattern of play we have at Rovers.
McClarky Posted May 31, 2010 Posted May 31, 2010 Of course you can compare them. Slightly same goal ratio in the same league. Ha ha, so Larsson's world cup exploits count for nowt? Boyd couldn't get a game for Scotland. Larsson wasn't even an out abnd out goal scorer anyway, he was more a number 10. No comparison.
alexanders Posted May 31, 2010 Posted May 31, 2010 I didnt say anything about Larsson world cup experience or shirt number. I said it is possible to compare the two strikers goal ratio when they are both playing in the same league and for one of the two best teams in the SPL. You can't disagree with that ?
Iceman Posted May 31, 2010 Posted May 31, 2010 Ha ha, so Larsson's world cup exploits count for nowt? Boyd couldn't get a game for Scotland. Larsson wasn't even an out abnd out goal scorer anyway, he was more a number 10. No comparison. this is exactly the reason, why we say that as fans, we don’t give the player the chance to prove himself. We have very little money to spend, but yet we expect an expensive striker, who has no guarantee of doing the business either. We will however be willing to give him a chance, because he is an expensive signing or a big name signing. Boyd is an interesting option, because he would come in on a free, and is fairly youngish with a good goal scoring record. Forget that it’s the Scottish league, he still has to find the back of the net.
ewoodpo Posted May 31, 2010 Posted May 31, 2010 Out of all the strikers that we have been linked with I would take Boyd. As long as we don't bring Beattie back I'm happy.
Guest Kamy100 Posted May 31, 2010 Posted May 31, 2010 Was talking to a Ranger's fan, he said that Boyd is a very good finisher, if we create chances he will put them away. However he said that he was sometimes lazy, lacked pace and may struggle with the pace of Premier League football due to low levels of stamina, I suppose that Sam and his team could work on some of these aspects should we decide to sign him. As a free transfer, Rovers may decide that he he is worth taking a risk on.
AJW Posted May 31, 2010 Posted May 31, 2010 Was talking to a Ranger's fan, he said that Boyd is a very good finisher, if we create chances he will put them away. However he said that he was sometimes lazy, lacked pace and may struggle with the pace of Premier League football due to low levels of stamina, I suppose that Sam and his team could work on some of these aspects should we decide to sign him. As a free transfer, Rovers may decide that he he is worth taking a risk on. the same could be said of kevin davies and sam worked wonders with him at bolton - i thinks he's a no-risk signing apparently he wanted 20k a week at rangers and they could not afford that , but surely we can , and if it doesnt work out we can ship him back to scotland or championship club for a fee
den Posted May 31, 2010 Posted May 31, 2010 i thinks he's a no-risk signing apparently he wanted 20k a week at rangers and they could not afford that , but surely we can , and if it doesnt work out we can ship him back to scotland or championship club for a fee It's a big risk if he's our only striker signing. Roberts and Niko haven't exactly hit the onion bag too often have they! In a small squad, we must have strikers who can perform.
andyroversmad Posted May 31, 2010 Posted May 31, 2010 I'm not a fan of Boyd but if it's between him and the other useless donkeys we have been linked too I rather we signed Boyd.
budha Posted May 31, 2010 Posted May 31, 2010 I don't see why we should sign another forward that doesn't fit our system. Boyd's been left out of Rangers starting XI because he can't play as a lone striker. We need a big lump with a big head, not a poacher.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.