Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 hours ago, chaddyrovers said:

I know you would be over all this story like a bad rash RF99. 

All because you done your homework until you make a official bid or Approach you won't know what fee a selling club wants unless it for a player they don't want. Agents would have been spoken to and told Rovers what they think Barnsley would want. 

No I don't agree but clearly you are expert on transfers? 

I watched Sunderland till I die documentary, and i remember Chris Martin's agent saying he was keen on the move then a deal was agreed but instead of him moving there he suddenly he stalled on the move and the week after he joined another club. 

why would we lose slots, when we having been playing our young players? 

You can make bids before the window.

It's called being proactive.

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, roverandout said:

He's 5'11

Genuinely didn't look it - maybe he was standing next to a couple of giants when I saw him on the pitch.

  • Like 1
Posted
6 hours ago, KentExile said:

 

Possibly right, although there was no issue 6 months (ish) after the Brierley incident when Tyjon moved from Rochdale to Rovers

They were desperate then. They aren’t now. A local billionaire is backing them. He’s forking out the £1.5 to £2 Million to pay for a brand new pitch mid season.

  • Fair point 1
Posted

Recap from VIs presser:

- Litherland out for 8 weeks

- Hedges could be out for rest of season (broken leg)

- Next players back from injury is 4 weeks away

- We are going into the loan market

- Toth to play vs Hull

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
24 minutes ago, RoversXtra said:

Recap from VIs presser:

- Litherland out for 8 weeks

- Hedges could be out for rest of season (broken leg)

- Next players back from injury is 4 weeks away

- We are going into the loan market

- Toth to play vs Hull

 

That would be the same loan market which the manager said there was no value in and simply restricts players which we own just 4 months ago?

  • Like 5
Posted
7 minutes ago, J*B said:

That would be the same loan market which the manager said there was no value in and simply restricts players which we own just 4 months ago?

Reading those quotes regarding injured players do we actually have a choice ? 

  • Like 2
Posted
8 minutes ago, J*B said:

That would be the same loan market which the manager said there was no value in and simply restricts players which we own just 4 months ago?

That's the one.

He's a real man of principle isnt he?

  • Like 1
Posted
6 hours ago, chaddyrovers said:

I know you would be over all this story like a bad rash RF99. 

Why would he not be all over it?

Surely you ascertain from the parent Club what sort of fee they would find acceptable before bidding? And if you're miles apart in your valuations, dont bother bidding.

Not make a joke bid of one fifth of the parent club's valuation to make it look as if you're doing something.

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, Tyrone Shoelaces said:

£5 million for a lad who’s been half as good as a player of the same age who we sold for £1M 6 months ago. Move on rapidly.

fixed it for you

Edited by KentExile
Posted
42 minutes ago, RoversClitheroe said:

Can I request on behalf of the whole of BRFCs you stop with the cryptic stuff on twitter.

Either post the actual thing or don't do it?

Yesterday the USA flag today another tweet.

Sure lad

Posted

Seems to be a lot of differences each week in what is said. Wants 2 this week rather than them all done by the same date.

Also this stance on being above loans in the summer looks even more silly now. I dont have a problem with loans as long as you arent overly reliant on them and obviously injuries can increase the need but it shows the lack of planning to say it, then loan in 2 and probably end January with a full compliment of them.

3 or 4 is not enough, nor would just loans be enough, we need a minimum of 5 in including at least 2 or 3 permanently. A left wing back is an absolutely critical and urgent requirement on par with a couple of forwards. Pickering isnt a wing back, Ribeiro obviously isnt and De Neve is pitiful.

We also need more natural cover for Alebiosu and a right footed centre back.

  • Like 2
Posted
1 minute ago, roversfan99 said:

Seems to be a lot of differences each week in what is said. Wants 2 this week rather than them all done by the same date.

Also this stance on being above loans in the summer looks even more silly now. I dont have a problem with loans as long as you arent overly reliant on them and obviously injuries can increase the need but it shows the lack of planning to say it, then loan in 2 and probably end January with a full compliment of them.

3 or 4 is not enough, nor would just loans be enough, we need a minimum of 5 in including at least 2 or 3 permanently. A left wing back is an absolutely critical and urgent requirement on par with a couple of forwards. Pickering isnt a wing back, Ribeiro obviously isnt and De Neve is pitiful.

We also need more natural cover for Alebiosu and a right footed centre back.

Yeah we should have known that half the first team squad would go missing for weeks on end. 

  • Like 1
Posted
6 hours ago, Tom said:

Cashin being on Brum’s bench outs another wannabe ITK account.

That deal may well happen as reported in lots of places but obviously it wasn’t the exclusive ‘done deal’ was it? 

Well see!

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
16 minutes ago, roversfan99 said:

Ismael has also said we need to wait on Hedges in terme of whether we need to replace him. How? 

He's full of shit, that's how.

Hedges is out of contract at the end of the season as well isnt he?

Edited by RevidgeBlue
Posted

Just a thought, but remembering Baradji is only on loan (with an option I think), shouldn't we be trying to sort that out this window as well ? 

Otherwise I can see it getting to Summer, us pissing about ad usual and missing out on him

Posted
8 minutes ago, roversfan99 said:

Ismael has also said we need to wait on Hedges in terme of whether we need to replace him. How? Even if its 8 weeks of course we need someone.

Ismael's comments on this are nonsensical. Hedges will have surgery and be in a boot for 8 weeks. There is no way he can play a first team match in less than 8 weeks after that. Season over. Why does Ismael try to throw a smokescreen of uncertainty over whether Hedges needs to be replaced? Utterly ridiculous and again just covering for the stinking recruiters.

  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, allanncd said:

Ismael's comments on this are nonsensical. Hedges will have surgery and be in a boot for 8 weeks. There is no way he can play a first team match in less than 8 weeks after that. Season over. Why does Ismael try to throw a smokescreen of uncertainty over whether Hedges needs to be replaced? Utterly ridiculous and again just covering for the stinking recruiters.

Even if we can only sign 3 or 4, left wing back has to be one of those.

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...