Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 minutes ago, Rover_in_the_South said:

How can you be more advanced in a process over another club, without making an offer?

Good question but he will be gone soon !

  • Like 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, ROVER_N_OUT1978 said:

Not a sniff of anything today then?

i think thats it,though there could be another inauspicious loan or forshaw type free transfer coming in,i`ll be amazed if there is another buy,as ever with the chicken disrespectors,someone will likely be sold to offset the jorgensen deal

Posted

or when your club can't sign any player capable of starting a football game immediately without the fear of an injury, or needing to get "up to speed". 

Pathetic.

Posted

Ismael has said across his pre and post match interviews around the Ipswich game that the focus is on a striker but that the Jorgensen deal has made that less of an urgent need. Seems very much like a case of seeing what if anything is left after that and deciding at that point whats next in line after that.

So nice and proactive as ever. And a good job we arent lacking in quality in pretty much every area.

Posted

What struck me about United’s win was that they were playing in a system not for a system. 
The  players had freedom to express themselves within their system not be a slave to it. 
We are trying to recruit players with flair and ability, not systems architecture heads. 
When  I hear people like Amorim or even Slot talk about the system then I smell trouble. 
Vi talks about players for a system. It means he can’t motivate players to express themselves within a simple 4-4-2, 5-5-2
They become more fearful about the system than their own ability to attack, or defend. 
 

  • Like 1
Posted
39 minutes ago, bigbrandjohn said:

What struck me about United’s win was that they were playing in a system not for a system. 
The  players had freedom to express themselves within their system not be a slave to it. 
We are trying to recruit players with flair and ability, not systems architecture heads. 
When  I hear people like Amorim or even Slot talk about the system then I smell trouble. 
Vi talks about players for a system. It means he can’t motivate players to express themselves within a simple 4-4-2, 5-5-2
They become more fearful about the system than their own ability to attack, or defend. 
 

I'm with you, I fancy our chances of staying up if we start playing 5-5-2.

 

In fact, I don't think I do.  Do we have enough players to play that?

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...