Rover_in_the_South Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago 5 hours ago, Wegerleswiggle said: How can you be more advanced in a process over another club, without making an offer? 1 Quote
Waggy76 Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago 4 minutes ago, Rover_in_the_South said: How can you be more advanced in a process over another club, without making an offer? Good question but he will be gone soon ! 1 Quote
windymiller7 Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 8 minutes ago, ROVER_N_OUT1978 said: Not a sniff of anything today then? There's certainly a foul stench stinking the place out!! 1 Quote
simongarnerisgod Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 6 minutes ago, ROVER_N_OUT1978 said: Not a sniff of anything today then? i think thats it,though there could be another inauspicious loan or forshaw type free transfer coming in,i`ll be amazed if there is another buy,as ever with the chicken disrespectors,someone will likely be sold to offset the jorgensen deal Quote
ROVER_N_OUT1978 Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago If that’s it we are all but down. Squad is woefully short 1 Quote
Ossydave Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Poor do when even Nixon can't be arsed making something up and the usual ITK bullshitters Quote
Ghost7 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago or when your club can't sign any player capable of starting a football game immediately without the fear of an injury, or needing to get "up to speed". Pathetic. Quote
roversfan99 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Ismael has said across his pre and post match interviews around the Ipswich game that the focus is on a striker but that the Jorgensen deal has made that less of an urgent need. Seems very much like a case of seeing what if anything is left after that and deciding at that point whats next in line after that. So nice and proactive as ever. And a good job we arent lacking in quality in pretty much every area. Quote
bigbrandjohn Posted 53 minutes ago Posted 53 minutes ago What struck me about United’s win was that they were playing in a system not for a system. The players had freedom to express themselves within their system not be a slave to it. We are trying to recruit players with flair and ability, not systems architecture heads. When I hear people like Amorim or even Slot talk about the system then I smell trouble. Vi talks about players for a system. It means he can’t motivate players to express themselves within a simple 4-4-2, 5-5-2 They become more fearful about the system than their own ability to attack, or defend. 1 Quote
B16Rover Posted 12 minutes ago Posted 12 minutes ago 39 minutes ago, bigbrandjohn said: What struck me about United’s win was that they were playing in a system not for a system. The players had freedom to express themselves within their system not be a slave to it. We are trying to recruit players with flair and ability, not systems architecture heads. When I hear people like Amorim or even Slot talk about the system then I smell trouble. Vi talks about players for a system. It means he can’t motivate players to express themselves within a simple 4-4-2, 5-5-2 They become more fearful about the system than their own ability to attack, or defend. I'm with you, I fancy our chances of staying up if we start playing 5-5-2. In fact, I don't think I do. Do we have enough players to play that? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.