chaddyrovers

Would that really suit Kane who need pace and runners around him? Who are your wing backs?

I have read what you say but you go on your little soap box. Yes I picked Bellingham as the 10 but after watching the games and listening to other people opinions about how well we played and look like a team and had runners off Kane, I can understand why people want Rogers in the 10 cos how can play off Kane. Do you not see that? Do you not see that the team must cone first? I reckon Rogers place is already confirm he will go world cup injuries.

Does it matter about his role at Forest given that he is playing with a different set of players but he was key player in their success last season which you can't deny RF99! The under 21's tournament was live on channel 4. So I watched every England game thanks Rf99 He has more than shown he is good enough for that role in those games but as ever you are over critical and doubting his undoubtedly quality and talent. Howe was huge fan and didnt want to sell him when they did. The Gerrard and Lampard situation is more than relevant to this point or last tournament when we played Foden on the left in the last tournament. We didnt look balance. Also the team looks more balanced cos you have runners around Kane with 4 players looking to get forward and in behind. Its suits us. Rogers poor form shouldn't matters cos he isn't in poor form for England. I will repeat if Bellingham or Palmer have to left to get the team working together and Kane then so be it

Well so far so good for him. He played a similar role for England during the under 21's tournament this season. Limited experience? You mean recent opponents? You can only play who we played but for me, its how he plays the 6 role and the partnership with Rice which both seem to suit each other games. But does it suit the team better tho? That's what matters surely? Team first? We tried to fit Gerrard and Lampard into the same system and it never worked out

Who was in charge of the Rovers under 21's?

Its what suits the team more than just individuals. We seen this all before we tried fitting Gerrard, Lampard, Hargreaves and Carrick into a starting 11 instead of dropping one or 2 or changing formation

Think his performances have shown he is level above good and given how he has performances were last season, England under 21's games this summer and his performances for England

Think Anderson and Rice partnership works. Anderson is a clever football. Very good player and only going to get better

6 is defensive midfielder not a centre back. Source: Coaches' Voice https://share.google/idnRsiFDoMUERo130

Tuchel didn’t hold back in his praise for Anderson. “He’s just a very, very good football player,” Tuchel said. “He has the physicality, he’s very mobile at No 6. He has the body, he loves to defend, he loves to put his body inside to duels. He loves passing, he loves to break the lines, he’s very mobile in this game. It was a pleasure to see .l

Who was in charge of Rovers today?

Anderson has the 6 is working next to Rice is working and looks good overall partnership Tuchel is playing a balanced team with players playing in their correct position. No shoehorning of players to get them in. Looks a good overall team. Eze must go to.the world cup. Gives you different type of player in a couple of roles

none of know but their comments are a matter of public record

or maybe both are telling the truth

Cos McKenna told them to do so? Also what did tell his players to do when losing and down to 10 players?

It wasnt problem until the last 12 months was it?

As someone said previously it would Environment agency problem and its would take years to find a solution and money to pay for it

He did that old pitch isn't to blame for the Ipswich game being called off but the pitch couldn't deal with the amount of rain we got.. The river level wasn't a factor and he was loud in saying. Also said we cant touch or changing in regard to the river. Its not something Rovers can do anything about

Mowbray and Waggott both said publicly that Mowbray didnt get Waggott the CEO job

Undav said publicly he turned down to stay and fight for Place at Brighton. We already a deal in place with Brighton. JDT and GB couldn't convince him to join us. Gregg Broughton's comments on the public record " I think it's on the public record we had an agreement in place with Brighton for Deniz Undav, and at that stage just before it was done, the player decided to stay in-house. " https://x.com/Rovers/status/1621486156721553410?ref_src=twsrc^tfw|twcamp^tweetembed|twterm^1621486156721553410|twgr^87f7e0e8d7a397d4e5e781152c1257c1b972938b|twcon^s1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ffootballleagueworld.co.uk%2Fkey-blackburn-rovers-figure-reveals-premier-league-striker-turned-down-january-transfer-move%2F

He needs to be club management but willing to be more adaptable in tactical

Not everything is about Rovers. He is young English coach and he has took his first move in management so I hope he does well there and develop into a good one

Given Waggott left around 5 months but according to companies house he is CEO here. I would have expected announcement by now

any more news on the Rovers CEO appointment yet?

Rovers not signing being able to convince Denis Undav to join us in January or even having a Plan B option meant we didn't get the playoff place or even better in JDT's first season. Understand think JDT learnt alot about English football but more importantly Rovers