chaddyrovers

Based on what? No-one is reliant on them but used it to back people opinion that Anderson is better suited to playing the number 6 (defensive midfielder) role than Wharton at this stage plus how Tuchel wants that role played and how the team play

Laughable comment. Scholes is one of best midfielder going ever in the PL. Take their Wharton's tinted glasses off

Nothing on line. Dont agree. Given that in my opinion we have only 3 spots in the starting 11 open and 2 of them are the positions that Bellingham and Eze played yesterday. Burn is a steady player but a squad player at best

Sorry, They were 3 points to play for, players given a chance to shine and against a tactic used by Albania that many teams will played against us. Bellingham was awful, Eze not good enough, Burn made mistakes, etc Cos Anderson was more effective than Wharton was as I said and I also said that I feel Wharton would be better playing higher up the pitch. I have said and others have said similar that Anderson is actually more suited to playing that 6 role(defensive midfielder) cos how Tuchel wants that role played but also how we play overall isn't he first in forward passes, or touches or line breaking passes or successful dribbles or progressive carries or Possession won then? I must have none seen that on Sky Sports PL channel before the Sunday games started.

these stats shown in those 6 categories he was ranked number 1 in every one which would say he has been the best in those areas of the game. Anderson has been very good this season and he has been in England shirt just like he was last season and for the England under 21's tournament which we won

Bellingham and Eze were poor but somehow Bellingham was man of the match according to the poll online with the England FA of course it matter, its a quality game and result and performance matter. Tuchel tried a different tactical approach first half. Not keen on that. Anderson was more effective in the 6 role(defensive midfielder) than Wharton was. Albania was well organised, solid and difficult to break down, something we face in the world cup so this was a good test for us, I fed up with you writing off these types of games at every opportunity you get. Why shouldn't take any significant Conclusions from yesterday?

or you could learn them and understand it but for clarity I will do both now.

why odd? cos I actually think Anderson is better suited to playing the 6 role (defensive midfielder) under how we play with Tuchel's tactical and I think actually think Wharton under these tactical instructions would be better higher up in the 8(box to box midfielder role). I think Rogers is better suited to playing as the 10 then Bellingham is and I didn't like his reaction at being sub. Childish behaviour

Those stats show he is the best midfielder in the league this season. He had a very good season and he is bang in form. Firstly, I'm not interested in you are skeptical of these stats and who says I follow that forest account. That is again you making assumption again. secondly, Anderson is much suited to being the number 6(defensive midfielder) in the way Tuchel wants to play but also in a game like yesterday when Albania who were very solid, defensively structure and well organised. I think Wharton needed to play yesterday and more in around the box instead of playing so deep. The Stones's experiment didn't work. more generic nonsense again from you.

He need a head coach who would help and develop him as a player. Similar with Niko Kalinic.

a bit left appointment from Boro

That's football people speak nowadays and is it that hard to understand really when you got people like Tuchel, Pep, Klopp and Ismael using them in media conference or comments

Question things? Oh give a rest FFS Yes Sky Sports pundits were discussing Anderson and showed how he the number 1 Midfielder in the PL. As I repeatedly said Anderson is more suited to play the 6 role than Wharton under Tuchel's tactics Higher rating? Based on people's opinion on each person performance Give it rest RF99. If those stats were in Wharton favour, you been all over it like a rash and shouting it from roof tops Always Downplaying who we played, the fact of the matter we can beat who we play. The fact of the matter Anderson is much suited to our we want our number 6 to play

?

I said a few weeks that both of them would be in my world cup squad

maybe show more respect for a different opinion and how good Elliott Anderson has played the 6 role since coming in

Why would we play him next to a defensive player? whoever the 6 player is whether Anderson or Wharton will play next to Rice surely? So who is this defensive player then?

my hero? Rev, Talking bollocks again. I just think Anderson is better suited to how we want the 6 to play and how we play as a team. Kane has to play, we don't look the same team without him and we don't have another striker in the squad, Would have like to see Welbeck in the squad and Watkins aswell

don't think this Stones experiment moving into the 6 role from centre back hasn't work for me. We need to get down the wide areas and not trying to over load the centre of the pitch

Nope Carter was on the bench so I expect to play. Hopefully Cantwell aswell.

far too soon to know as the media wouldn't have access to Ismael during the international break to ask questions