Mowbray would like Man City Tommy Doyle on loan for the season according to Rich Sharpe

Yes we have to save money and reduce the wage bill whilst meeting FFP requirements otherwise its another embargo for us. Is that what you want? We are losing around 20 million per season can we afford to keep doing this every season? Yes I would love to millions on Armstrong's replacement but we can't. Still think our best bet is a player plus cash deal but we will see what happens in the coming days.

Look at the club accounts and we are losing millions of pounds per season. Thats what FFP is focus on the Profit and loss column in the club accounts Have we made a profit on player trading? Sold Raya and bought Gallagher in 2019 and 2020 we bought Kaminski and Pickering so where is profit on player trading Venkys have put into the club yearly but still lack the knowhow and experience to run a successful football club

yes we all agree but Rovers would still have a massive wage bill to start with. So you need a hire a a good footballing CEO to run the club and put in a proper football structure and plan in place of how the club will be run. Then come up with good pricing on season tickets and match day. And talk to speaking to fans who haven't bought ST for a few years and how to get them back if you can. I know some Rovers fans who won't come back to a regular match going due to family and work commitments. But the club ticketing staff and the CEO/commercial director should be talking to fans and doing what they can to get them back

I thought you would bring up Boro spending money on a player of 5 million pounds but what you have overlooked is the money they have spent and recieved from transfers. So here is a quickly breakdown of that for the last 4 season 20-21 season. transfer spent 2.7 million. transfer received 400k 19-20 season. transfer spent 3.1 million transfer received 12.5 million 18-19 season. transfer spent 19 million transfer received 43 million 17-18 season transfer spent 50 million transfer received 48 million So they have spent about 75 million in transfer fees spent but received 102 million pounds so that profit of 27 million and FFP rules aren't a problem for them like us. Plus they have double our attendance each game

well no Cos Covid affect will be the club accounts for 20-21 season not the latest accounts which are for April 2019 to March 2020 so we don't have the impact on the club with covid yet. https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/00053482/filing-history/MzMwNjA2MTkyOGFkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0 But the wage bill went up last season as we have 31 players in the squad and we know the season before the wage bill went up. Yes the wage bill has been cut but compare to our turnover still too high and will always require ownership money investing to cover the losses. I don't see Preston paying the wages we do or the transfer fees of 7 million for a player. Mowbray has spent around 17 millions in players bought then add loans fees for a few players then the wages we pay on transfers in the 3 years. He hasn't been forced to sell any players he didn't want to be. He has had great backing in terms of fees being paid and wages. So cos of his failure to get us promotion last seasons means cutbacks in the wages paid out and transfers fees will have to happened. We didn't go down cos of Selling Rhodes. We went down cos of Coyle appointment.

Armstrong wants out and why keep an unhappy players at the club? Who says we would get relegated if we sold him? if we got Idah as part of the deal on permanent basis then we have replacement in

Yes but we are only allow to lose 39 million pounds in losses in 3 seasons period and allowing Armstrong to leave on free would be crazy and mean other key players would have to be sold. League embargo that can veto any signings and control how much we can spend in wages. And you be happy with that?

We need to raise funds to meet FFP threshold of losses only of 39 million pounds over 3 seasons but we have lost 39 million in the last 2 club accounts/seasons so its ain't got owt to do Covid. The owners backed Mowbray again last seasons with signings and higher wage bill last season than ever. And Mowbray failed to deliver promotion. Other clubs don't have our high wages compare to our turnover and clubs sell players for money during the 3 year period but we haven't apart from Raya. Thats it. Mowbray has spent 20 million in transfer fees here and plus wages. He has been financial back and not deliver. Yes we know they are other reasons why the club is in the state it is. But we have discuss this haven't we? I think the squad is good enough to stay up and we can keep bringing through our young quality players Rhodes was always going to be sold cos Lambert didn't want Rhodes and his playing style doesn't fit Lambert who wants a Target man striker like Graham then skilful striker like Watt or pacey striker like Jackson. It was clear from pretty much when Lambert came in

Well we could sign players from European clubs with points system when he was appointed. Mowbray failed to use this network properly and signed players who don't fit his tactics or style.

Is it sensible to allow him to leave on free next summer meaning more players like Travis would be sold to fill in the financial background? We need money in. You are quite happy to go into embargo again which limited your signings and wages. We been down this before and it wasn't good

We need to address the financial losses of the club and we are allow to lose 39 mil over a 3 seasons timescale. We are losing 20 million pounds a season so we need ao

Yes but 15mil plus a permanent replacement in Idah would be ideal. We are losing 20 mil per season so looks well over 39 million over 3 years allow under FFP.

I would accept that deal and idah on permanent basis It's a permanent move for Idah according to the Sun paper. Can we reinvested money within FFP Rules?

Probably done articles on this possible move and be online in morning

What happens if Idah comes in and scores 15 goals this coming season and we stay up? What wrong with using our own academy players in the first team?

Well he is only gain experience playing first team football. Not sitting on bench. Every signing is a gamble Just thought you had suggestion or two. It's appears our European Scouting Network has been downgrade due to Brexit and the work permit point system. Mowbray didn't use the European scouting network enough before the point system came in.and he is to blame for that.

Didn't we have Dack and Graham as our front line if I remember correctly and it was cracking partnership And if you look PROPERLY through my posts in the last 48 hours I have been saying it's unlikely any signings we been made without Armstrong being sold. We are getting a Armstrong replacement as per of the deal plus money close to the asking price.

Why do you omit his FA CUP hat trick against Preston? Also how many proper appreances has he had at Norwich like starting games to get those 3 goals? Or were they just 10 minutes appreances at winning situations? Do you have suggestions who to replace Armstrong with?

Well that's what the tweet says. Armstrong was untested here as number 9 striker until Dack got injury. Then Armstrong moved to striker role and scored goals for fun. Something else you were unsure about he could do whilst I.said that how we replaced Dack goal return by moving him there

Idah would be good signing for us and would give us pace and knows where the goals are. Yes he is young but is international player for Ireland

Looking like Norwich and Southampton both want Armstrong. I would take Adam Idah as part of the deal. Something I mentioned weeks ago getting Adam Idah as part of the Armstrong deal

What loan signings? Are they going to better than we have? Why not develop our own players? That's what was said by Mowbray after the last game or so. We have 3/4 centre backs fit for the Swansea game. And who would you want to sign as senior centre back then?