Any odds on Marcus Maddison plus a couple of defenders replacing Dack?

50 years of hurt for my Wednesday mate I have known. For 55 years ?

I would for defenders. But I would choose them for him?

And apparently for England?

I think core to some of the attacking problems is that Mowbray brought in replacements for Graham who continued to outshine them all. Brereton and Gallagher are not bad players. They have performed well for other clubs. But the replacements have been played out of position to keep them playing and justifying their price tags. In a strange way it may be easier once Graham is done and Dack is sold. One of them will own the 9. Who knows, maybe they will both play up front and put Armstrong wide. I do believe that Mowbray thought that Bauer was a shoe in and then when Mulgrew was told he might not get regular games he probably threw his toys out. All total speculation of course but unless Tony is on this board in disguise, that’s all we got. I agree that we need at least one solid centre back bought not loaned but unless Tony has some dosh under the mattress, it may have to come from the sale of Dack.

We are. You only have to read other clubs notice boards. ?

Was anyone happy take a draw against the top team before the match?

I didn’t see the game but if Mowbray fields the right team for the opposition, I would have thought that Dack and Graham would have been the ideal starting line up with Downing and whoever, fizzing balls into the middle League 1 style. But then what do I know?

Captain Pugwash?. That’s scurrilous. You should walk the plank for that insinuation

Well it’s all rather exciting. Anything that gets us all in a tizzy means that bold experiments are afoot. Belt up for possible turbulence on our journey. ???

Very depressing. Two owners one delusional, and the other a chance waiting as s creditor to scrape a few bob off the remains.

We paid more for Leon Best?. Makes our last two $5million signings a mere bagatelle ??

Not to mention. https://onn.network/7120/jerome-anderson-football-agent-who-extended-his-reach-even-into-heavyweight-boxing/ Heavyweight &@$&@‘

Blimey what a legend. Can’t you change stuff in Wikipedia to make it more truthful? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jerome_Anderson_(football_agent)

At any moment any club owner can do that and it’s curtains. Many cut their losses fairly quickly, acknowledge that football is not their core competence and leave their club in the Tom tit. Thats all all I am saying.

Let’s take a moment to acknowledge the dire plight of two neighbors due to awful ownership that could put put them out of business imminently. Let’s recognize that for all the false starts and bad decisions more from naivety that anything else, our owners have stayed the course and given our manager money to spend. We can dream of 1995 but time is now and I am happy that we are building something here not having it destroyed in front of our very eyes with lifelong fans chained to the railings outside.

I am in a glorious time warp. Watched Rovers on TV win at Hull followed by a tremendous John Mayall concert and Ten Years After tomorrow night. Glad Rovers have “room to move”

Assuming a no play clause for Cunningham against Cardiff?

There is no time for bedding in these days. Lose two games and back to tried and tested. Eventually Graham will not be an option. That’s when we shall see whether the investments are just that.

Maybe that’s the long term strategy with Brereton

Before we all get too depressed you might want to see the results tonight. Huddersfield, Boris, Brentford etc

TM on captain

Making Charlie look like Beckenbauer. JK

I think most fans are unhappy. We come back from our hold with high expectations and our dreams are shattered. Because that’s what they are. Meanwhile someone may have to eat “Peter Frampton” if this doesn’t go through. https://www.wigantoday.net/sport/football/wigan-athletic-leave-it-late-for-charlie-mulgrew-1-9925339

Hmm. Not sure if his fitness or motivation. He Will get the same can’t guarantee you a place speech and probably less money