No.

Leo is the best keeper on our books. That doesn't make him good, but it makes him our best.

Hilton is shocking. Eastham is better.

I really hope Telalovic proves his point.

To tell the truth, I am more interested in when we will next bully a team.

It might be hard to believe, but at the moment it is true.

That isn't going to be a long list.

Pears is worse than Leo. We need a better goalie.

And the tide is coming in.

What a waste.

Both boxes ticked by Batty, yet he seems further away from the first-team than ever. What has happened there ?

At least we have got the digital FA cup to look forward-to.

I have seen Hilton play, and he is not as good at his best, as Leo at his worst. There is no definative proof, it is just an opinion.

Eastham is the next best keeper after Leo. It is a shame about his lack of physique.

Although Hilton would probably be no worse than Leo, from what I have seen, he would also be no better.

Hopefully all the shit ones.

I did, then the game kicked off.

The only real pace in the entire club is Batty.

On his bike in a couple of weeks.

From youth games that I have seen, we have no keeper at the club who is better than Leo. This is only my opinion.

It's a shop window.

From what I have seen Hilton is not an improvement on Leo.

The problem being 10 of those minutes are provided by the opposition.

It is not so much the selling of Kaminski, but who they got to replace him. We now have two second choice keepers. I wonder if the coaching, might have the tiniest influence on the situation ?

I just wish JDT didn't have to apologise so often, and that is down to him. He has to apologise because the players are not giving their best (whatever that is). It is one of JDTs tasks to get the best out of players.