Jump to content

BRFCS

BY THE FANS, FOR THE FANS, SINCE 1996
Proudly partnered with TheTerraceStore.com

rigger

Members
  • Posts

    15015
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    25

Everything posted by rigger

  1. We'll be in the play-offs !
  2. You have to wonder if they actually scouted Hirst, or just looked at a good bits video.
  3. We could draw against Luton and win by one goal at Millwall and still get in the play-offs
  4. In theory we can still get in the play-offs with just a draw against Luton as long as we beat Millwall and other results go for us.
  5. Vale is not a championship level player, time will tell.
  6. And that attitude is why Waggott is still here.
  7. Having seen them all,(live). I would pick Burns before Vale or Leonard. Maybe the Rovers are thinking the latter two may improve more, in the future.
  8. So we have finally reached a must win game.
  9. On present performances you would have to say, we dodged a bullet with Brereton.
  10. Why was my comment unnecessary ? Season ticket pricing has everything to do with Waggott. I have been, but don't want to be a season ticket holder at this point in time. That doesn't make me any-the-less of a Rovers fan.
  11. I'd even be tempted to put him in the shop widow, by playing Burns against Luton.
  12. Did you get your free," I support Waggott " badges ?
  13. Not only that, his game is made for the high press. Some team is going to pick up a bargain.
  14. It's not all over for us, most fans still have belief, just not blind faith.
  15. That's because the EFL know that if Shef Utd go up their problem goes away.
  16. Now we have got two cups to win.
  17. Don't support Waggott. Don't buy a season ticket.
  18. Forty years ago I went to a game at Dusseldorf. I was in the standing area behind the goal. When it strarted to rain, most of the fans in that end were getting soaked. The stewards moved us all into the side, seated area under cover. A simple but effective guesture to show that the fans were being considered.
  19. Equally we could lose and still stay up.
  20. Kaminski is more positive in his decission making, which tranfers to the defenders in front of him. He commands the penalty area better. He takes crosses better. They are both about the same at shot stopping, but Pears has a tendancy to block shots back into play, Kaminski tends to find a safe area. And by the way, it's my opinion.
  21. The thing that winds me up is, every pre-match the players go through a practice routine of receiving the ball 15 yards or so out, then shooting. During the game they forget all that and pass the ball on.
  22. Another unprovable statement. The only fact is, we know of one keeper that didn't stop the shot. To come back from the land of fantasies, I think Kaminski is a better keeper than Pears. I would always pick the best players.
  23. The situation is hypothetical, so cannot be proven one way or another. I could say yes, TK would have caught the ball, released it, to lead to a Rovers attack from which we scored what turned out to be the winning goal. But again that is purely hypothetical.
  24. But it didn't work, overall or not. We lost, how can that be working.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.