rigger

It depends on what you mean as an out and out center-forward. If you mean someone who puts himself about, across the whole forward line. Harries defenders and forces them into mistakes and scores goals. I would say, yes. If you mean a hold up target-man, then I would say, no.

Yes there is. Both are poor football teams on a continent that has a couple of very good teams. Because they are on the same continent as some good teams does not automatically make them good teams. If you cannot see that comparison that is not my fault. Or are you saying that the present Chile side is a good one ?

I doubt if Annesley will ever get a first team game with the Rovers. Even at 16 Phillips looks a better center-half.

You could say the same about Scotland, in relation to Europe

Why should I look again at my post. It is what I believe. If you don't agree, that is your prerogative. I still don't class ten championship and two Chillean goals as, Made It. He scored a good goal this morning, and long may it continue, but that doesn't make him a good player. To me it makes him an improved player

He has scored 10 goals in the championship, and he has played in the eighth strongest South American side. I don't class that as made it.

I still don't rate him, and I don't think he has ,Made it.

If you were single minded enough, you probably could, but the patient would die.

Personnally I would say Wharton and Carter are more likely replacements, with Magloire and Phillips as understudies. Before anyone says why do I want this. I want it noted that I do not agree with this, but it is what I think The Rovers will do.

He could join the queue of center halfs, unless he can play right-back.

Peace in our time.

It would be funny if they banned alkohol at the ground

For me success is not about how many you can beat Andorra by. But how you get on in competitions. We haven't won one of them in a while.

For me the season ticket pricing at the beginning of the season was a bad deal, the pro-rata offer is still a bad deal. Ergo, I won't be buying one.

To me, his first touch throughout was poor. He did not stand out, against amateur defenders. I wouldn't put his goal into a class of, a great finish. Once the defender and keeper lost his position, he could not miss.

what at.

I don't know if we have a board. But a good start would be to sack the plank that is the manager.

And not even a good 41 year old.

Our U23s would beat Andorra. The game last night was more entertaining than this.

Life's too short.

He was, I think, pointing out that the original statement that, Britain is a country, is factually wrong. Britain is made up of 3 countries, England Wales and Scotland. It is the same as saying Europe is a country. I think everyone would have known what was meant by the original statement.

If we are being picky. Roverandout, never said, that Jim said, Britain isn't a country.

I tend to agree with you. What I was trying to say, was that I think his intensity should be utilised from the beginning of a game, as he can last at least 70 mins, rather than just 10-20 mins as a sub. On his aggresive side, at a game earlier in the season, two center-halfs got so wound up with Burns that they reverted to trying to physically intimidate him. He had none of it, neither of them could handle him. Another bonus is that for a player who puts himself about, he doesn't get booked that often.

I would say he is already, as good as any of our forward options. I would expect him to be on the bench against Coventry. Personally I would start him, as his main asset is his non stop hard work. I don't think he will make such an impression as an impact sub.

I disagree with your statement, but everyone is entitled to their opinion.