RevidgeBlue

Good riposte. Don't really understand what enjoyment you derive out of a two way bun fight at best which in recent years has been exceptionally one sided though. Guess you'd have to be a fan of either Club to get it.

Always been "The Riverside" to me and always will be, no disrespect whatsoever intended to Jack or irrespective of whether a new stand is ever built.

Yes. Shearer before his first injury as well. Bellamy? Overall though Id say the exception rather than the rule and that's going back over 50 years. We've never had much pace throughout the side that I can recall.

I wouldn't hold your breath chaddy.

Neither are absolutely top drawer obviously or they wouldn't be playing here at the moment. The Tronstad we saw against Sunderland reflects my general view of him - him and Travis have looked a very good pairing this season but it's no coincidence we struggled last season and against Sunderland without Travis imo. Dolan blows a bit hot and cold but overall he works incredibly hard and I think he's quite decent. More goals and goal involvements than Cantwell who everyone seems to think is great. Why is there never any outside interest in Tronstad if he's as good as everyone thinks?

So does that mean you think he'll still be here next season then chaddy?

I can't remember a time when we've ever had much pace in the side. Lack of genuine pace seems to be a Club trademark.

What's your initial view on Gallagher Potterlog? My friend roversfan99 will always defend him to the hilt and he had a moderately successful initial loan period here in a season which saw us relegated but since returning on a permanent basis for a vastly inflated £5m fee I genuinely think he's been one of the worst strikers I've ever seen pull on the blue and white halves in 53 years of watching the Club. I'm old fashioned and judge a striker primarily on goals scored. For me a top striker should be willing to kill his gran to get on the score sheet. Gallagher in his 2nd spell looked like he never considered scoring goals as part of his job description and could never be bothered getting into positions from which he was likely to score. Neither for such a huge physical unit did he impose himself on the opposition and for someone 6ft 5in jumped 5 ft 7. Second touch was a tackle. Apart from that he was OK as George Best famously said about Beckham. (You're probably going to tell me you love him now!) Lol.

Thanks for the reply. I must admit after I posted I checked Walters' career stats and didn't realise he'd played so many games for you. What I meant was, he's not a former playing superstar in the Rooney/Lampard type bracket which makes it sort of understandable why they keep getting gigs irrespective of managerial ability. Ironically we're probably in the same sort of boat as we've drafted in a former player ourselves (Rudy Gestede) as DOF who as far as I'm aware doesn't seem to have any formal qualifications apart from shadowing our very unpopular CEO Steve Waggott around for a period. The decision was met with derision by most of our fan base but I actually thought our recruitment in the summer on an extremely frayed shoestring was infinitely better than under the previous recruitment regime. However that might have been down to the previous old school Chief Scout/Head of Recruitment John Park who has since left due to an apparent disagreement over the reliance on data led Recruitment going forward. I guess we'll find out (probably to our cost) in January.

I actually rate him as one of our better players. He'll be on a relative pittance currently and as with all our better players in recent times we won't be offering him enough to entice him to re-sign. If he does leave as seems likely you can bet your bottom dollar the replacement won't be as good. But at least "Hedgy" will no doubt re-sign and do the square root of naff all for a further two years so happy days.

Wasn't wrongly chalked off. The ball deflected off the defender therefore it doesn't count. Stupid rule. I agree on Dolan though he was sensational first half.

That's very weird. You could understand it maybe if he was a former superstar as a player and carried some gravitas within the game due to that, but he's never really done anything of note. He's a bit of a laughing stock here as well due to the circumstances under which he was sacked from our Club before his career had ever really got off the ground.

3 last season. If someone is constantly injured then they're no use. You might as well sign me at age 61. Whether he might actually have scored many more if available more often is also a fairly moot point - he didn't score in his last 14 games or so for the Club I don't think. Whist Gueye is far from the greatest player I'd summarise it by saying he doesn't score enough but is a handful for the opposition. Gallagher didn't score enough and wasn't a nuisance for the opposition. As a side issue, Gallagher also cost £5m and was on £15/£16k p.w. Gueye cost around £1m and will be on a much lower wage. Small steps but ones in the right direction.

I'd swap Hedges for ACD and attempt to get at least two goals clear by the hour mark at which point changes could be made if any of them are suffering from fatigue due to the schedule.

That's exactly how I'd like him to be. He has the talent to be far more influential imo. He ought to be dictating games. The table posted above is fairly telling - pro rata he's behind the likes of JRC and Weimann (who have played far fewer minutes) and the much maligned Dolan.

Hedges, 2 goal involvements in 1363 minutes of play and some people think he should still get a new deal.

I wouldn't really say he's made "a good start" he doesnt score enough, but he's got a bit of potential, at his best he's a real nuisance for the opposition defence. I'd contrast that with Gallagher who similarly didn't score enough and wasn't a nuisance either.

Cantwell didn't just fade during the last ten minutes (which would be understandable) though did he? Might as well leave it there as we obviously won't agree on this.

Not sure why you are being sarcastic or condoning his fairly obvious lack of fitness.

You sign Gallagher and Ennis, you deserve all you get. What salaried professional could possibly think that was a good idea? A prime example of the Sporting Director/DOF model not working in quite spectacular fashion.

Needs to get properly fit then doesn't he?

That's the most sensible analysis on the point I've seen. Wasn't it Sir Alf who said that if you had a system you had to pick the players to suit the system and not the other way round. On the contrary as far as we go, we don't have the luxury of picking from the best players in the Country to fit into a certain system so you'd have thought we'd have to adapt our tactics to whoever is on the pitch. On balance you'd have thought that Gueye would benefit from us getting down the outside of the opposition and putting crosses in. Maybe Leonard too if he's sniffing around looking for knockdowns. Ohashi wouldn't.

I too thought that, although he worked hard, apart from being in the right place at the right time for the goal, Ohashi was completely ineffective. Now I've always said that if a striker scores, he's done his job and it doesn't really matter what the rest of his game is like and I'll stick by that but it's the games where he doesn't score that are the problem - and he hasn't scores for months prior to yesterday. It's a real conundrum how to get a worthwhile tune out of Gueye/Ohashi. It would be nice to think Leonard might provide part of the solution.

It was difficult to tell if it was going in from the sideways angle on Sky but he didn't half leather it goal wards and it was unfortunately blocked by the defender. First time I've seen him connect with a shot properly. Lol.

Whose fault is that? You say that like it's acceptable for him only to be fit enough to play one half.