Previous to the court case they sent money when it was needed or when they felt like it but now they have to ask first and follow a set of rules laid out by the court, if they don't then they can't. Therefore there is an impediment.

Yes,right on. De Keersmaecker would be more than positive. Rather have Garrett, even(dare I say it) Buckley than Gore. Makes the Forshaw re-signing more positive by the day!

I really don't think you understand the meaning of the word impediment. If they could send funds with no, affidavit, no bond and no court permission, they there would be no impediment, but all 3 of these exists. They can send funds, so long as these 3 conditions (Impediments) are met.

to be fair he's been injured for Malmö as well. So it's not a Corry Evans situation, where he was always fit enough to play for the National team, but always injured for us...

So there’s still no impediment, just a choice about if/when they send money.

Wilsden deserves some royalties!

Interesting that this conversation happens and within an hour there is an article containing similar information in the LET. Proof that Jackson is a frequent reader of the forums?

It’s recorded…awaiting TX date from TalkSport… Against the winners of this tie

12.30 away at Swansea on the opening day, Rovers fans to be reminded ad infinitum that this is what everyone wanted, hence the TV deal. Southampton away to be a noon kick off on a Sunday in the middle in January. Cannot wait.

De Keersmaecker would only come if we lose Trav or Tronstad, guarenteed. Gore I don't want anything to do with, makes JRC look like a low injury risk.

I think so, there’s only one affidavit listed** which isn’t related to when we know a payment was authorised (whether with or without a court order). I think it’s reasonable to assume the other one was related to a payment, whether one we’ve not heard of or where, for some reason, they sent the money in two tranches.*** In addition to this, I can’t see anything in any of the orders which requires one filing for any other reason. ** after the date at which filing one became a condition of sending funds (31/10/23) *** having looked again I’m not so certain in this, but still believe the June affidavit relates to the £4.85 payment being sent - I’m going out now but will explain my logic later on. (if anyone’s interested! 😁)

Only thing is last season the whole EFL started same weekend and League 2 were shown live at 3pm - the blackout didn't apply, shows it here: https://www.efl.com/news/2024/june/26/watch-every-game-on-the-opening-day-of-the-2024-25-season/ This season 1 and 2 start a week earlier. You are probably right regarding 12:30 kick offs but it is a bit different to last season this time.

Can we be certain that the affidavit is related to a payment ? Nothing showing on companies house regarding a new share allotment. There are other affidavits listed against the case which don't coincide with payments and some that do.

Next round, Herbster?

Yeah the TV deal is still the same so all first day, last day, midweek and bank holiday games will be live. That means no Saturday 3pm kick offs for the opening day for the Championship.

With this money they allotted shares in Venkys London Ltd, on the previous occasion they allotted shares in Venkateshwara London Ltd. As to why they’ve stopped creating equity in BRFC and have instead chosen to add more to what the club owes the holding company 🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️

I think his replacement signed a few days ago personally.

Travs replacement, you would think.

This kid has been injured forever, would be a crazy risk to take him on, even on loan.

Don't see Keersmaecker happening now that we have Tavaras. Dan Gore, bloody hell. He has played 5 games in the last two seasons due to injury.

Thought they did this by an allotment of shares each time they sent money to the club. 28 June 2023 £21.665,000 was put in by an allotment of shares. With transfer income from January 2024 sales crazy they needed another 11 million by March

I think it may have done as the amount owed to the parent undertaking increased by almost that exact amount (£10,919,918) in the year ending 30/6/24 accounts. You do have to wonder how the club made a profit but ended up owing more to the Venkys mind…