I think he will. Rovers have offered him a new improved Contract So even if you scouted him, Ismael wants him, he had a medical here, does not count for owt? I don't agree, We can still bring him in, but you didn't rate him anyway so it doesn't matter that we might miss out on quality signing

FFS, back to this crap again. Ismael told you straight yesterday he wants one more signing and anyone who leave can be replace. Sound like we hit our limit on wage budget and after we sign the Right winger we hit our limit. Maybe actually look at what has been said by Ismael, instead of going on your little soap box again about I want x and y and Z. We can't just keep adding players to our squad without getting rid of players we don't want The only person who doesn't think it was Penalty is you and you finding excuse after excuse not to agree with everyone who said it was a penalty. Moore got one yesterday for less contact Ohashi got. It was penalty all day long so I suggest you take those anti tinted Rovers glasses off good for you, if we have got that penalty and scored it, it probably be a very different game after it.

Here you go Chaddy If the club are refusing to publish these as an honest representation of the meeting, who do you think is lying - The club? Or every fans forum attendee who agreed that these minutes are accurate?

Im not judging it based solely on one game, Im basing it on his 13 games since he's been here. I saw yesterday as a continuation of what happened last season. I might be proved completely wrong. Who knows. Let's hope so. The Forum would be a boring place if you didn't or couldn't pass an opinion until after something had actually happened.

Version 2 do, but version 1 doesn’t. Is he not curious enough to read them and find out what is going on at the club he loves? He hasn’t read either yet, but can still pass judgment on those who have. Baffling.

And full backs who can double as centre halves.

I agree regarding getting bodies in the box. We wouldn’t have scored the sort of goal they scored after 20 minutes of the game because we wouldn’t have have had enough players in and around the ball for it to fall to one of our players. Hedges and DeNeve won’t be there. Neither will Travis or Tronstad.

A fan who does not read the minutes, yet is prepared to have a go at someone who has and is now wondering why the two versions differing so much, and now questioning the version that look suspicious.

Yeah, some judge on the squad on quality and not just bodies you can write down on a squad list. Lacking any quality out wide, still short of pace, short of craft/technical ability, short of someone to take set pieces, and crucially short of goals.

Squad overloaded with midfielders and bereft of attacking options both in terms of numbers and quality.

Because they unequivocally paint the ‘club’ in a bad light and he doesn’t want to see it. That pesky Glen.

More or less sums up my views.

Not enough forwards (wide or central) of the required quality, who can be relied upon to say fit and provide goals and/or assists

Why?

But you just said you haven’t read the minutes. Please read both version 1 and then version 2 and answer honestly if you still can’t understand, why people are questioning him.

They put one on him very early on that marked his card. One they got away with.

can you please explain this comment please?

I have had a go and said similar things to you. I will personally call him and apologise, if he warrants an apology, as like you, I can’t understand what he was thinking about, with version 1 of those minutes.

Miller looks to be one that can look after himself. Axel is too obvious. Gueye never gets the benefit of the doubt off the refs so he’s treading a fine line before he starts. Abeliosu got wrestled too the ground too easily for me. I suppose we’ll see in the coming months who the fighters are.

Haven't read them If the club need a criticising for someone I will. Yes I did but then after thinking about everything I ain't or won't let anyone drive me away from supporting my club since 1991/92.

bournemouth,with crowds of 11000,paying massive wages on a big squad now spending 35 million quid on diakete and still sticking to ffp rules????not playing by the rules imo and neither are the others,fecking corrupt is that premier league,at least we will never be tainted by it🙂

HEAR! HEAR!

Wasn't Travis's best game yesterday but I thought he was the only one of the midfield who showed any heart or aggression. Showed how we'll be in even more trouble if we sell imo.

Whilst most of us think we were toothless iv'e seen quite a few Baggies fans saying they are pleased how they tried to play but we looked a solid well organised side who largely stopped them and we'll do ok again. Seen a few also saying 'Dolan is a big miss for them'.

It's a good job no-one is accusing him of being involved in the Great Train Robbery then! Completely disagree Mike. I think John (O2G) is a really nice guy and Im sure everyone who meets him will say the same. Nevertheless I dont see how that stops anyone from being able to disagree with him occasionally. I've complained in the past ( and received flak in the past from K Hod) about the apparent lack of resistance to Waggott just saying "Wont" "Can't" "Wasn't aware" or "We'll look into it" to everything at the meetings. According to the official minutes no-one said a dicky bird in response. I can only assume that everything that was said in the meetings wasn't recorded. Now it would appear from the last meeting that in the originally agreed minutes, not only have did we have large chunks which would have painted the Club in a bad light omitted, but embellishments that weren't said added to make the Club sound better. I.e. Pasha supposedly saying "sustainable but with the overall aim to becoming a viable Premier League Club" as opposed to just "sustainable" which was what GM and DM claim. If wondering why this appears to have happened is "a witch hunt" then I'll run down to the shops now and get my pointy hat. We've learnt more from this one meeting than we have from years of Waggott stonewalling questions. But none of it would have come out had GM and DM not dug their heels in about the minutes. If O2G thinks anything said on this thread is factually incorrect or correct but unfair because there's a valid reason for it Im sure he'll give his side upon return from holiday.