Jump to content

BRFCS

BY THE FANS, FOR THE FANS
SINCE 1996
Proudly partnered with TheTerraceStore.com

[Archived] Credit Crunch To Hit Football?


Recommended Posts

Nicko, do you think this could have any immediate impact on Liverpool's squad/spending?

It seems the scouser's want more investment than ever after being so close last year, but the numbers mentioned make pretty bad reading.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 520
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I cannot believe the sports press this morning.

It's all about Liverpool might not be able to compete effectively in the transfer market when the club's auditors say they are going bust quicker than Accy Stanley if £350m isn\'t found in the next 49 days!

Some fans web sites are getting the grim picture though. American owners leading club to bankruptcy.

The Times is on their own in looking at yesterday's bombshell accounts seriously. Scary that Gillett and Hicks guessed interest rates so wrong as well. They conclude that Hicks and Gillett must have done enough to convince UEFA that Liverpool are viable next season otherwise they would already have lost their license to compete in the Champions League.

My guess is rather more prosaic.

UEFA haven't had the balls to kick Liverpool out and now have a headache confronted with KPMG\'s going concerns comments on LFC's accounts- UEFA regulations specifically state all clubs competing in their competitions are going concerns and Liverpool's auditors are saying that right now, Liverpool are not a going concern.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that all these massive clubs in massive debts is great - I think United, Liverpool, Chelsea, Arsenal, West ham etc should all be removed from the league until their debt is at a suitable level - i.e. no more than £20m. Wouldnt that be great!! ha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that all these massive clubs in massive debts is great - I think United, Liverpool, Chelsea, Arsenal, West ham etc should all be removed from the league until their debt is at a suitable level - i.e. no more than £20m. Wouldnt that be great!! ha

sadly £20m is more than manageable to all the top 4..

on a good note. if the £1.5bn united will have to of paid by 2015 stated by someone else in the thread is true, they will have to pay £166,666,666 a year to the bank to clear said debt. can they afford that? i dont know what their yearly revenue is so i couldnt say..

NOTE:calculations are going off the standard Bn that has 9 0s and not the british Bn that has 12

Link to comment
Share on other sites

sadly £20m is more than manageable to all the top 4..

on a good note. if the £1.5bn united will have to of paid by 2015 stated by someone else in the thread they will have to pay £166,666,666 a year to the bank to clear said debt. can they afford that? i dont know what their yearly revenue is so i couldnt say..

NOTE:calculations are going off the standard Bn that has 9 0s and not the british Bn that has 12

Everybody uses the AMerican Billion now, eg. newspapers talking about government spending etc.

British billion is instead referred to as trillion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everybody uses the AMerican Billion now, eg. newspapers talking about government spending etc.

British billion is instead referred to as trillion.

so i was right with the 9 0s then.. thanks for that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For the PL. Setanta going bust would initialy lose the League £350m or roughly 18% of the clubs' income. The 2008/9 final payment is due to the PL on 15 June apparently but the indicatons are that Setanta will not make it to the 15th.

BSkyB would love to pick those rights up but would immediatey be clobbered by monopoly problems at national and EU level.

This points to ESPN/Disney getting in on the cheap.

It does make Rovers cutting the wage bill by £5m look very sensible and put the club ahead of the game at this stage.

Not related to Setanta but one number that has come out is players' agents made £70m out of the Premier League in 2007/8. Enough to set up and run the National Training Centre.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Philip is their some sort of connection between setanta and ESPN/Disney ( they were trying to merge ) or am i mistaken. Also do you think the club could have sensed something was wrong at setanta and thats one of the reasons why they want to cut the wage bill.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Philip is their some sort of connection between setanta and ESPN/Disney ( they were trying to merge ) or am i mistaken. Also do you think the club could have sensed something was wrong at setanta and thats one of the reasons why they want to cut the wage bill.

Everyone knew that setanta had problems for ages. It's been mnetioned on here loads of times before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Philip is their some sort of connection between setanta and ESPN/Disney ( they were trying to merge ) or am i mistaken. Also do you think the club could have sensed something was wrong at setanta and thats one of the reasons why they want to cut the wage bill.

I don't think there is a connection between Setanta and ESPN. They both put rival bids in the latest round of PL deals.

I bet if/when Setanta do go bust it'll still take about 3 months to cancel the bloody direct debit!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not related to Setanta but one number that has come out is players' agents made £70m out of the Premier League in 2007/8. Enough to set up and run the National Training Centre.

Its about time the FA set up a centre - where players can only use agents from this centre (for a set % fee) and then it will stop clubs being ripped off by greedy agents.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its about time the FA set up a centre - where players can only use agents from this centre (for a set % fee) and then it will stop clubs being ripped off by greedy agents.

Shouldn't that be the PFA's responsibility?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's the situation with West Ham?

Fire Sale and panic? Or Even keel and sensible budgeting?

Scotty first posted this link in the Allardyce thread but scroll past the Kevin Bond story to the bit about West Ham

It certainly looks very grim at Upton Park this summer.

Significantly, increasingly the assumption is also that Setanta won't be handing over any cash any time soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The PL have handled this quite well, by announcing on Monday that Setanta had until close of business today to pay up or lose the 46 games for next season - but at the same time giving notice to interested parties that they should prepare bids for a Monday (22nd) deadline. Showing support to the incumbent but making sure business as usual has a high priority.

It's important to get things moving because the packages Setanta have lost include 8 "second choice" matches. So as things stand, Sky can't make much progress in nominating their live games from Wednesday's fixture list.

The 46 games other broadcasters are now trying to win by Monday are: Packages C and D - 23 games each.

Package C = 23 third-choice matches shown at 8.00 pm on Mondays.

Package D = 8 second-choice matches + 15 fourth-choice matches shown at 5.15pm on Saturdays.

There are 38 "first-choice", 38 "second-choice", 38 "third-choice" and 24 "fourth-choice" games in the entire live offering over a season ... making a total of 138 games, sold by the Premier League in 6 packages of 23 games per package.

It's perfectly possible that the two packages now up for offer will go to two different broadcasters - the PL need to maximse their income given that they won't get Setanta's cash for the final year of this 2007-2010 deal. What happens for the next deal (starting August 2010) where Sky definitely have 113 games and Setanta only had 23 ... is anyone's guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.