Jump to content

BRFCS

BY THE FANS, FOR THE FANS
SINCE 1996
Proudly partnered with TheTerraceStore.com

[Archived] West Ham Vs Rovers

BPF

By BPF
in Football Messageboard Archive

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 357
  • Created
  • Last Reply
MarkBRFC71

MarkBRFC71

Posted
Posted

DiSanto is also known for 1-1 mishaps this season though. he gets the benefit of the doubt due to foreign name and youth.

Roberts is known for his 1-on-1 mishaps for the last 3 years though, he gets the benefit of the doubt for what exactly? He's the only striker you would actually BACK to miss a one-on-one!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
deftangel Premier League

deftangel

Posted
Posted

Yes Di Santo wouldn't have made the chance. We know this. We also already knew that Roberts wouldn't finish it.

It should therefore be obvious to the expert that playing either or up front on his own is likely to lead to NO GOALS. We've half a season of evidence for Di Santo and a fews years worth for Roberts to come to this conclusion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BPF Champions League

BPF

Posted
  • Author
Posted

So i take it you don't class McCarthy as a Premiership striker if its based on goals this season?

Of course you have to factor in minutes played into the ratio.

Another important consideration is past performances. Di Santo has few very goals at all even for his age. His goal for Rovers, I believe he knew very little about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MarkBRFC71

MarkBRFC71

Posted
Posted

Based on goals scored in the Premiership this season I don't really class Di Santo as a Premiership Striker

Nonsense. He's good enough for Chelsea but not a Premiership striker? Di Santo is plainly a better player than Roberts, who would just about be a good Championship striker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BPF Champions League

BPF

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Nonsense. He's good enough for Chelsea but not a Premiership striker? Di Santo is plainly a better player than Roberts, who would just about be a good Championship striker.

Good enough for Chelsea? I'm sorry I didn't realise he was a regular first teamer for them...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dan

Dan

Posted
Posted

We've actually looked pretty threatening on set pieces today. Which is good, though it makes me laugh when EVERY commentator says stuff like "Rovers will always be dangerous from set pieces" Not when Gamst mkII was involved, Gamst mkIII is looking pretty decent at them now. Though the long throws still haven't looked like working, ever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Backroom
Tom World Cup

Tom

Posted
  • Backroom
Posted

FT a very good away point

It goes both ways, not losing was a lot more important than winning today

8 points outside the drop zone as it stands

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.