Venky’s (& Suhail) Out Protest Ideas

[...]

1 hour ago, Mattyblue said:

The ex-players don’t care, or certainly don’t care anywhere near enough.

All more than happy to go into hospitality for the day, get a fabric cap etc.

Let's be honest they've all moved on 30 years ago we won the prem. They are but relegated (no pun intended) to he history books now and that's all they are. They have no reason to defend us or get involved with it all this far on

[Mattyblue]

‘Have Blackburn still got those owners? Not like Jack Walker’s day. Ah well’

…will be the only thought most ex-players ever give it (and even that’s if prompted).

[chaddyrovers]

26 minutes ago, KidderStreetNoise said:

Were they protesting?

Do your research KidderStreetNoise? All available on a Google search

26 minutes ago, KidderStreetNoise said:

More pissed off about a game being called off than the running of the football club?

Nnnn

26 minutes ago, KidderStreetNoise said:

Look forward to seeing you run on the pitch during Millwall game. 

No respect for other opinions. What about Disabled supporters or elderly ones. 

26 minutes ago, KidderStreetNoise said:

How did it challenge Reading & Blackpool's owners?

 

 

Very different situations Kidders plus the owners were here and in this country. Are Venkys? 

26 minutes ago, KidderStreetNoise said:

NDA's

So Rovers legends like Garner, Shearer, Atkins, Friedel, Dunn, King Kenny are all covered by NDA? 

[KidderStreetNoise]

4 minutes ago, chaddyrovers said:

Do your research KidderStreetNoise? All available on a Google search

That'll be a no then.
 

5 minutes ago, chaddyrovers said:

Look forward to seeing you run on the pitch during Millwall game. 

No respect for other opinions. What about Disabled supporters or elderly ones. 

What about them?

5 minutes ago, chaddyrovers said:

Very different situations Kidders plus the owners were here and in this country. Are Venkys? 

How are they different situations? Because of the location of the areas, maybe we need to be even more extreme than going on the pitch & stopping games then.
 

6 minutes ago, chaddyrovers said:

So Rovers legends like Garner, Shearer, Atkins, Friedel, Dunn, King Kenny are all covered by NDA? 

Garner, Shearer, Atkins, Friedel & Dalglish will have no idea how bad things are under Venky's.

[Mattyblue]

They’re covered by the ‘I don’t particularly care but I’ll have free hospitality though’ agreement.

[chaddyrovers]

9 minutes ago, KidderStreetNoise said:

That'll be a no then.
 

Like I said do your own research pal

9 minutes ago, KidderStreetNoise said:

What about them?

No respect and thoughts for others. 

Exactly what I thought.

9 minutes ago, KidderStreetNoise said:

How are they different situations? Because of the location of the areas, maybe we need to be even more extreme than going on the pitch & stopping games then.

Dont complain when you get a criminal record and banning orders for Breaking the law. That sort of stuff isn't right. Just dont attend the games 

9 minutes ago, KidderStreetNoise said:

Garner, Shearer, Atkins, Friedel & Dalglish will have no idea how bad things are under Venky's.

Really?.

[chaddyrovers]

2 hours ago, Mashed Potatoes said:

In fact the local MP did refer to the club during the HOC debates on the Football Governance Bill. On 28 April he asked the junior minister to "join me in congratulating Blackburn Rovers on their outstanding community work, especially to support young boys and girls from all backgrounds in football ? Their commitment to inclusivity and development at grassroots level is truly commendable."

But not the owners point

[aletheia]

Press, politicians, bishops all had a go when the Raos first came and started the damage. Defeaning silence from the owners. Perhaps, there may be a new round of such voices.

I keep getting an image in my head of The Black Knight as the last fan going to Rovers shouts "just support the team" only to find that there is no team on the pitch. 🙂 

[47er]

21 minutes ago, KidderStreetNoise said:

That'll be a no then.
 

What about them?

How are they different situations? Because of the location of the areas, maybe we need to be even more extreme than going on the pitch & stopping games then.
 

Garner, Shearer, Atkins, Friedel & Dalglish will have no idea how bad things are under Venky's.

TBF Shearer throws in comment every now and again.

[lraC]

2 hours ago, Mashed Potatoes said:

In fact the local MP did refer to the club during the HOC debates on the Football Governance Bill. On 28 April he asked the junior minister to "join me in congratulating Blackburn Rovers on their outstanding community work, especially to support young boys and girls from all backgrounds in football ? Their commitment to inclusivity and development at grassroots level is truly commendable."

Grass and roots.

Now that's so very appropriate.

[KidderStreetNoise]

8 minutes ago, chaddyrovers said:

Like I said do your own research pal

God forbid you answer a question eh. They weren't protesting, just dickheads running on the pitch to celebrate promotion.

8 minutes ago, chaddyrovers said:

No respect and thoughts for others. 

Exactly what I thought.

I don't understand how one game being abandoned affects disabled & elderly fans more than their club dying in front of them

9 minutes ago, chaddyrovers said:

Dont complain when you get a criminal record and banning orders for Breaking the law. That sort of stuff isn't right. Just dont attend the games 

But no Reading fans got charged with criminal records or banning orders. People aren't attending games now, doesn't make a jot of difference.

10 minutes ago, chaddyrovers said:

Really?.

Yes, really.

[KidderStreetNoise]

4 minutes ago, lraC said:

Grass and roots.

Now that's so very appropriate.

Off camera, wouldn't say anything on the record, or would have to be messing around with editing like Big Sam

[chaddyrovers]

9 minutes ago, KidderStreetNoise said:

God forbid you answer a question eh. They weren't protesting, just dickheads running on the pitch to celebrate promotion.

Still broke the law and face the consequences as anyone should when they break the law. That's is what you are calling for, people breaking the law. 

9 minutes ago, KidderStreetNoise said:

But no Reading fans got charged with criminal records or banning orders. People aren't attending games now, doesn't make a jot of difference.

And you think that would be the same plus add the new law that come in this parliament.

9 minutes ago, KidderStreetNoise said:

Yes, really.

these people will know plenty. Plus Blackburn MP or Tim Farron could ask questions in Parliament about the ownership including during PMQ's or UQ. They could say anything and not face any legal action but dont. Wonder why? I feel that's the best way to act to get them. Sheffield MP Clive Betts asked questions during PMQ's and Culture, Media and Sport sessions about the Sheffield Wednesday owner. Its was HRMC that bought him down. 

[Bronzed A Donis]

3 minutes ago, chaddyrovers said:

Still broke the law and face the consequences as anyone should when they break the law. That's is what you are calling for, people breaking the law. 

And you think that would be the same plus add the new law that come in this parliament.

these people will know plenty. Plus Blackburn MP or Tim Farron could ask questions in Parliament about the ownership including during PMQ's or UQ. They could say anything and not face any legal action but dont. Wonder why? I feel that's the best way to act to get them. Sheffield MP Clive Betts asked questions during PMQ's and Culture, Media and Sport sessions about the Sheffield Wednesday owner. Its was HRMC that bought him down. 

1 question. Yes or No answer.

Are you satisfied with how the club is being run?

[KidderStreetNoise]

2 minutes ago, chaddyrovers said:

Still broke the law and face the consequences as anyone should when they break the law. That's is what you are calling for, people breaking the law. 

No banning orders for people on the pitch vs Doncaster or Oxford...

3 minutes ago, chaddyrovers said:

And you think that would be the same plus add the new law that come in this parliament.

The new law which was to do with entering a stadium without a ticket after the Euro 2020 final, nothing to do with pitch encroachment, that one?

4 minutes ago, chaddyrovers said:

these people will know plenty. Plus Blackburn MP or Tim Farron could ask questions in Parliament about the ownership including during PMQ's or UQ. They could say anything and not face any legal action but dont. Wonder why? I feel that's the best way to act to get them. Sheffield MP Clive Betts asked questions during PMQ's and Culture, Media and Sport sessions about the Sheffield Wednesday owner. Its was HRMC that bought him down. 

Parliament will never get involved, because if they investigate the club's operations, it'll link back to the FA's partner at the time Kentaro. Which will look really bad for the football association, so the government will not touch it.

[Mattyblue]

You are new here. This thread is just classic Chadster - i.e trying to nail jelly to the wall.

Edited 4 hours ago by Mattyblue

[roversfan99]

This "what about disabled and elderly fans" argument is bizarre even for chaddy.

Im sure there are some disabled and elderly fans who are also desperate for change and would welcome an attempt to try and force change.

[chaddyrovers]

1 hour ago, Bronzed A Donis said:

1 question. Yes or No answer.

Are you satisfied with how the club is being run?

Nope. 

Given what I have posted over the months and years the question was already answered but I dont not believe in breaking the law to make your like someone is advocating on here. Its on those who choose to do so. 

How you get the owners get sell is a point no-one can give my answer. Attendances down over the years, drop to league 1, had offers of help and supports from people,had people inquiry and put bids in all rejected. We seem protests, walk out during games but nothing has changed. 

Anyway that's my final comments in this thread

[wilsdenrover]

Woohoo 

[AndyB]

41 minutes ago, chaddyrovers said:

Anyway that's my final comments in this thread

Is that a promise?

[RevidgeBlue]

44 minutes ago, chaddyrovers said:

We seem protests, walk out during games but nothing has changed. 

Anyway that's my final comments in this thread

I'll bet it isn't!

Have we seen either concerted protests or mass walk outs during games? I genuinely don't recall them if we have.

[wilsdenrover]

3 minutes ago, RevidgeBlue said:

I'll bet it isn't!

Have we seen either concerted protests or mass walk outs during games? I genuinely don't recall them if we have.

Not unless the Riverside leaving early counts 

[Rogerb]

6 minutes ago, RevidgeBlue said:

I'll bet it isn't!

Have we seen either concerted protests or mass walk outs during games? I genuinely don't recall them if we have.

Ipswich and Sheffield Wednesday come to mind

[RevidgeBlue]

8 minutes ago, Rogerb said:

Ipswich and Sheffield Wednesday come to mind

I was thinking more organised protests in advance, rather than people going home early pissed off because we were losing or the game had been called off because we havent got a playable pitch!

[aletheia]

Thinking back to my post earlier with the picture showing a reference to the peaceful protests in Parliament Square, it wouldn’t be an easy thing to copy.

First, stewards would confiscate any placards.

Second, Ewood is a private place so I’m not sure there is any right to protest even peacefully.

Third, if maybe lots of ‘senior’ fans linked arms with placards (or even lay down) outside the ground, I suspect they would then get abused by fans who just want to watch a match.

I think first base should be a match boycott –see what the appetite is among fans for straightforward action.

I would like to take this opportunity to thank Glen (and I’m sure there are many others, now and in the past) for efforts to make this club better. It must be very difficult with an obdurate, arrogant and distant regime willing to use bullying and litigious methods against its own fanbase.