v Watford (a) - 13/9/25

[London blue]

2 hours ago, rigger said:

We do have the option of playing three at the back, until one of the three get injured or suspended. It is a risky strategy, but it is available. If VI does choose this plan, and it is successful, happy days. If not then he will have to try another plan.  

I disagree. You can't expect to play a formation when you have close to zero depth in 3 positions.

[rigger]

2 minutes ago, London blue said:

I disagree. You can't expect to play a formation when you have close to zero depth in 3 positions.

Explain to me why three center-halves can't be played, when we have three center-halves available. If one or more get injured or suspended, then the formation has to be changed. I am not saying it is the most favoured system with our available players. But it is playable.