Tyrone Shoelaces Posted Monday at 09:51 Posted Monday at 09:51 5 minutes ago, davulsukur said: Nixon suggesting that moving Gueye out is largely down to getting the wages down even more! Unreal, the players we've signed must be on less than all the ones that left. This will only end one way. Quote
KentExile Posted Monday at 09:57 Posted Monday at 09:57 10 minutes ago, davulsukur said: Nixon suggesting that moving Gueye out is largely down to getting the wages down even more! Unreal, the players we've signed must be on less than all the ones that left. I thought that was common knowledge Quote
SIMON GARNERS 194 Posted Monday at 10:50 Posted Monday at 10:50 57 minutes ago, Tyrone Shoelaces said: This will only end one way. Everything pointing towards the Club being under financial strain. Quote
davulsukur Posted Monday at 11:06 Posted Monday at 11:06 1 hour ago, KentExile said: I thought that was common knowledge I thought so, yeah. So we've already reduced the wage bill down this summer but it seems that wasn't enough, they are still looking at shipping players out and replacing them with cheaper alternatives to bring it down futher. We must have the lowest wage bill in the league. Quote
London blue Posted Monday at 11:09 Posted Monday at 11:09 So we're hoping for a player to make an impact on the first team, and assuming this player will demand a lower salary than that fucking lump. Jesus wept. Quote
RevidgeBlue Posted Monday at 11:09 Posted Monday at 11:09 (edited) 41 minutes ago, SIMON GARNERS 194 said: Everything pointing towards the Club being under financial strain. In fairness, I mean if the decision to stop showing Rovers "for free" in Blues Bar but still allow it in other areas of the ground you have to pay a fortune to get into didnt tell you that......... Edited Monday at 11:32 by RevidgeBlue Quote
davulsukur Posted Monday at 11:15 Posted Monday at 11:15 5 minutes ago, London blue said: So we're hoping for a player to make an impact on the first team, and assuming this player will demand a lower salary than that fucking lump. Jesus wept. If they don't rate/Don't want Gueye, they'd have just been bring Tyjon off the bench, at the very least his value might have gone up. Quote
London blue Posted Monday at 11:18 Posted Monday at 11:18 Joined up thinking? Expecting too much. 1 Quote
RevidgeBlue Posted Monday at 11:21 Posted Monday at 11:21 (edited) The most worrying thing about it is that whilst Gallagher was on a fair old wedge totally out of kilter with his ability, Gueye must be on a fraction of that already. So any attempt to cut down on that even further doesn't inspire confidence that anyone who can make a positive difference will be brought in. Edited Monday at 11:22 by RevidgeBlue 2 Quote
KentExile Posted Monday at 11:22 Posted Monday at 11:22 (edited) 20 minutes ago, davulsukur said: We must have the lowest wage bill in the league. Sheff Wed will be the lowest by some distance, they were capped at £7K/week during the summer, and lost the majority of their squad on top of that Then you will have Oxford, Charlton & Portsmouth, we are probably ahead of those for now (as they will still have a fair few in their squads who wont have had much uptake in wages since their respective promotions), at least until the next round of cuts (eg Cantwell) Edited Monday at 11:26 by KentExile 1 Quote
pick32 Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago Gueye out and August Priske in please plus a quick winger Quote
simongarnerisgod Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago i doubt if makhters wages are anything to do with it,more the fact he`s turned completely shite this season and looks well out of shape Quote
chaddyrovers Posted 4 hours ago Author Posted 4 hours ago Deffo need a striker and right wing back in January Quote
davulsukur Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago Baradji at least, looked good when he came on. If he carries on like that, should be a useful player. 2 Quote
RevidgeBlue Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 29 minutes ago, roversfan99 said: Need a lot more than that. But won't get it....... Doubt we'll get a striker -they cost money. Some desperado on loan at best would be my guess. Quote
chaddyrovers Posted 3 hours ago Author Posted 3 hours ago 34 minutes ago, roversfan99 said: Need a lot more than that. But you conceded and admitted you cant do all that in January transfer market. How signings is realistic in January? I think 3 or 4 is realistic. Quote
roversfan99 Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 1 hour ago, chaddyrovers said: But you conceded and admitted you cant do all that in January transfer market. How signings is realistic in January? I think 3 or 4 is realistic. Quite frankly, the squad shouldnt be so short and have so many absolute wasters in it. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.