lraC

Fair play Glen. What happens from here?

It is pretty clear from all of this, that it i a case of keeping the truth of the size unrest, away from the owners, for as long as possible, thus protecting certain individual in situ at Ewood Park. I wasn't in attendance, however, unless I am very much mistaken, the reason for the confrontation was due to Pasha taking issue with Glen, having communication with the owners. That tells me, that Pasha is frightened of the owners, knowing what is really happening, thus protecting his position. Hopefully the statement being released today, gets to them too and we see the start of his demise, as it will be a significant removal, in my opinion, if that does happen.

I was

It is ironic you should say that, as I had a 1-1 meeting with Waggott at the back end of 2023. His main concern in that meeting, seemed to be, if I was recording him or not.

That's good to hear. Hopefully a clear and concise statement will follow, and it would be a real shame, if they did get away with this, as it is exposing the shambolic way in which the club is being run.

The first time then and they are surrounded in controversy. Is it a coincidence in your opinion that Waggott has now gone and we have had others speaking more than they normally would, who have perhaps not handled the criticism, very well?

Can I just ask, as I may owe O2G an apology here, which I will make, if necessary. The first version contained lies and inaccuracies. Was this done in error, or was it done so that the status quo remained? I was under the impression that the inaccurate version of the minutes, was one man’s version and if he lied in them, then that is not acceptable. Fans on here and I’m sure in general, have been hoping to get some feedback and were hoping that the fans forum, was the voice needed to ensure that the club is being run in a professional and safe way.

I think there is a very simple solution here, but perhaps, I am missing something. Release both sets of minutes and put a caveat in, to state who does and who does not agree with each version. Given that the club have struck a line through certain parts that they don’t agree with, or don’t want releasing, highlight those bits as being rejected, by the club and ask them to comment on why they want it removing. If they won’t give a reason, simply say, the club refused to comment on why they rejected XXX but the fans attending, consider these minutes to be fair and accurate. Rather than asking anyone to resign, go down the route of a no confidence vote again and get it out in the press. It’s pretty clear now, that these meetings have been a pointless exercise, so again, either a coalition statement, or a FF statement, ensuring that it’s made perfectly clear, who is making the vote of no confidence and who isn’t.

Well said.

I know we can make it bigger and better on here than the stooges at the club ever will. The clock is taking, but with the merchandise idea and perhaps a few more other people making suggestions, can put the clubs version to shame,. I have touted an unofficial fans takeover day and wonder if there would be an appetite for that.

Thanks great to hear Ian. I love my retro shirt that I bought off here and will definitely be interested in any anniversary merchandise.

Did that bit about his response to you, go in the original minutes? Hopefully it did, as it is typical of the attitude of some. The seem to forget that we know about certain things and how he can suggest you get your facts right on this, shows what he really thinks.

From what I understand, Pasha took exception at Glen having direct contact with the owners, but perhaps he can clarify that. Why Pasha would do that is open to debate I guess. These original minutes contained lies, according to Glen’s posts, so why is that and is it a one off to save embarrassment, or normal procedure, to keep relationships intact?

Read what Glen has posted which is pretty damning. Either this is a one off and has been called out, due to people attending, who will challenge those not acting in the best interests of the club, or it’s the norm. Fine for you to leave it there, but fortunately some won’t, as doing nothing, is not an option.

I guess it is now down to the people who were present at the meeting. It seems that we have two versions of the minutes. One version that the club were happy with, but several attendees weren’t and another version, that the club, have now rejected. Perhaps the club, now need to explain, their reasons for rejecting the second version, as the fans, are still in the dark. I haven’t seen either version, but of course the club, do have a responsibility, to meet with the fans and certain things need to be dealt with in order for them to comply with their responsibilities. It appears to me, they they are falling well short of this, but whether they are held to account or not, remains to be seen.

The great reset. One per season, which put another way, we messed the last one up, so let’s wipe the slate clean and start again.

Well given what we have now learned from Glen Mullan, perhaps you need to show me and a few other people a bit more respect, It appears I am correct to say, what I have, or of course, you could carry on defending, someone, who despite good intentions, may have been letting the club off the hook.

Thank goodness you are calling this out. They were once again, getting away with this and for those who were happy to let them do so, by omitting things from the minutes and adding things that were lies, please have a serious look at yourselves. This time, they are not getting away with it, but perhaps they have in the past and as we have just seen with my reply to one supporter, people were convinced, fans were doing a good job on these meetings, yet it appears that they were letting the club, cover some serious issues up.

Sadly, he has been allowing the club we love, to get away without being properly held to account. I am hopeful we will see exactly this, very soon, as we have had a club friendly version of the minutes and a non club friendly version this time and given they haven’t been challenged in the past, they have done more harm than good in my opinion.

Imagine that. A chorus of Venky’s out, during the next one.

There you go again. You bet your life it was.

I think we may have a couple of dogs with a bit more fight in them now.

I certainly think a deadline should be given, as surely it cannot take a couple of weeks to read and agree a set of minutes.

Thanks. Sounds like they could have had them for a couple of weeks then. Maybe they don't like the edited version, but I wonder why?

I firmly believe it is Pasha getting rattled easily that has caused this situation with the minutes being delayed and edited. He will not want an official version of events to be out in the public domain, if it paints him a bad light.