lraC

Not hard to read. It’s a well articulated post and thanks for making it.

I can see where he is coming from too, but as most posters know, impediment is just another word for conditions and as most also know there are conditions to be met. Yes they can meet them and send the funds, but it does not mean that they don’t exist.

I really don't think you understand the meaning of the word impediment. If they could send funds with no, affidavit, no bond and no court permission, they there would be no impediment, but all 3 of these exists. They can send funds, so long as these 3 conditions (Impediments) are met.

I guess getting the need for a bond is paramount and given the reduction to 50% it was a tactic that worked. Whether they go back and try again, in the hope that they can get all impediments removed, remains to be seen. A better option, would be to admit defeat and sell the club, of course.

At least there is no impediment.

Losing, not loosing. Lose, not win, loose, not tight.

Hypothetically, that makes sense.

I think he is the last visible one and I’m sure if you ask Glen, he would say that too.

You align with me on that. I am convinced they are still here too, only keeping a low profile, or disguised with other connections.

He had a hard act to follow really, with Rogers Jones and then Paul Bradshaw being the previous two keepers, who were both outstanding. Let's just say, he wasn't the best and certainly caused a few butterflies here and there, when the ball was in our box.

I remember Butch very well. Obviously an admission that we are old timers. 🙂

Dracula?

Accrington away.

Which half is the dark side?

I don’t think it’s the coalition, as they would have announced it.

Hopefully they come to the conclusion that he is useless and they don't trust anyone else enough to take over and they decide to sell. If only Carlsberg did meetings in India.

I think the coalition had Waggott and Pasha in their sights and think that is the logical way, given the difficulty in getting any traction in India. If Pasha does crumble, as expected the foundations are ripped away and I expect it to topple.

I didn’t say YOU did, so wonder why YOU responded?

I am pretty convinced, that if Pasha goes, it will be game over for the owners. As you have pointed out, he is the one feeding back to the owners and has tried to hide some of the unrest from them and made things out, to be a whole lot healthier than they are. More people are aware that he does not like publicity and it has been posted on here, that he actually fled the building, when a fans meeting, involving him, was due to get underway. He avoided getting involved in any of the fan meetings, until he was shamed into attending one and I think the tactic of focusing on him, is a good one. For anyone prepared to criticise, fine, as it won't suit everyone, as these things never do, but fairs fair, anyone criticising,, needs to put as much effort into their ideas too, as sitting back and criticising others, but but nothing yourself, is without doubt less effective in getting our club back.

It’s a shame how Buckley has tailed off. As you say, he certainly has an eye for a pass and I had very high hopes for him, at one point.

I agree. The impediments in place, don’t prevent them from sending funds, but whether it’s semantics or not, there are impediments and that’s a fact.

Blessed are the Keersmaeckers.

At least there is no impediment. 😂

A bit more on Chansiri. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dejphon_Chansiri

Another fit and proper owner. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c1ld90y36q4o