Oooft dude, you could not be more wrong!

I thought his kicks were fine, it was how he set his walls that always bothered me.

Already replied my dude

9-10

I mean... yes. But what you paid wasn't the actual increase, which was to £429.

Is. Tatters. Integrity. In. His Rearrange as appropriate.

1966, eh?

Glad Szczesny shat on Messi.

You once paid £199 to watch 19 games, only £10.47/game. You're trying to justify a 75% increase in 12 years, and a 33% increase from just two years ago.

Is he seriously trying to suggest that Burnley's Dave Fishwick Stand is better equipped than the Bryan Douglas Darwen End? Seriously?!

About a year ago now, yep. And Fielder told us that fans in the ground aren't as important as corporate season tickets and youtube influencers, citing his own failure as a father to get his son to support Hull City instead preferring to support Arsenal 'because some youtuber he likes supports them'. That such a blatantly incapable marketing hack is in any position of power at our club frightens me. Oh and his big ambition for the club amounted to selling NFTs 😂

But it isn't £20/season over 12 years. It was about £10/season until 2 years ago, and about £100 increase since. If prices had increased at the same rate to about £330, it'd still be too high for many but at least they wouldn't be extracting the urine.

Yeah, they're the most expensive they've been in a LONG time, possibly ever. The last pre-Venky ST cost £199, less than this year's HalfST.

My dad's just said 'Typical, we have Senegal AGAIN'. Amazing how your mind plays tricks on you.

Spit the Diouf 😂

The quality looks up there with FootballTown (my favourite footy retailer). I'll be jumping on this particular bandwagon!

I'm not hating that line-up actually. I feel like he's somewhat done as I'd suggested earlier: Brought in Henderson to shore up the defence in order to release the shackles of the forwards (albeit he's obviously giving some a rest). Bellingham pushed forward between Rashford and Foden, and behind Kane looks tasty to me.

I would argue Nelsen, but can't remember if he was free or not. Surprisingly cultured baller in defence from a footballing backwater, could read the game, and hard as nails. So hard, in fact, he broke his leg early in a game away to Charlton and kept playing! There's something about Kiwis, they know no pain!

A lot of fuss about the back 5 HOWEVER a 5 is essentially a 3 if the wing backs are Trent and Shaw. Bringing Henderson to shore up 3 cbs is fine by me AS LONG AS it means others are brought in to be more expressive in attack. Grealish and/or Foden brought in too makes Henderson a good decision imo.

A tie against 'Ryan Reynolds' Wrexham would suit me.

What a game that was!

Have to say if the USA had the England team's funding they'd be world beaters imo. Possibly will be in the next 20 years or so.

'On paper we'd have won that game, but sadly for us football's played on grass'. Cloughie.

Re: England, I feel like we need to stick a back 4 to accommodate more attacking players. But I do think it's now worth going with TAA whom I've previously stated would only be good in a back 5. I'd go with: Pickford TAA Stones Maguire Shaw Rice Bellingham Saka Foden Grealish Kane On 60 or so, bring on Rashford and Sterling in place of Kane and one of the other attackers to put pace against tired legs. I'd also being on Phillips at some point.