J*B

Genuine question... small fee, let’s say... £1.99 / month for an ad free version of the website, thoughts? It’s not intentional that the ads have changed, but it might be an opportunity.

The liquor draw is being raided. Beer just isn’t cutting this.

When they broke then (29 minutes) at one point it was 6 v 4. In the attackers favour!

Where are this lot getting fresh haircuts from!

Please welcome your new Fans Forum representative, @K-Hod, who will be representing BRFCS.com, the BRFCS podcast and its members at the upcoming fans forum meetings. K-Hod will be canvassing opinion on this thread, reporting back to the Club and then updating this thread too. The next meeting is Monday 8th.

Some outrageously good players in that video. It’s such a shame we had all of that ripped away from us.

I’m confused, are we talking about toasted sourdough muffins here? I live in the Ribble Valley.

Call an estate agent

I’m so deflated that he’s not walked today.

Things I’m not interested in seeing or hearing: 1) Any talk about a journey 2) Where the managers best interests are 3) The value of the squad 4) Promotion from League One 5) The style of football 6) What the stats say 7) Being trusted to nurture top talent I’m judging this solely on the results and performances in the last 12 months.

It’s some journey this.

I think you’ll be 50% correct

We do have a rep - we’ve sorted it, its fine. I forgot what I did in 2017... Our rep will be posting on the forum canvassing opinion prior to the next meeting and reporting back post meeting.

I’d love to know who’s representing BRFCS at the Fans Forum meetings. Because it’s none of the BRFCS owners.

Not that we know about!

The most astounding bit of this is Mowbray was a good defender.

No invite for us this time. Is it Lindsay?

Which wine would you recommend for me to forget all about this @Mercer?

Bradley needs a goal for some confident ASAP. He looks so off it.

We look good here. I’d rather it was 4231 but you can’t have everything.

It's also a huge misconception that the users of this site don't represent the 'general fan' - one thats usually peddled by people that either: 1) don't enjoy the forum (which is fine) or 2) have previously been banned from the forum and now have an agenda. The forum usually receives - on a normal day, 700 individual hits from across the globe. Of which, usually, around 200 post, but the majority of the 700 are members with an 'active' account to post if they see fit. Each of those 700 people usually spend between 10-12 minutes browsing the forum each session, which is massive, a normal website gets between 30 seconds and 2 minutes. The people hitting over 2 minutes tend to come back two or three times a day for similar periods of time. There isn't another Rovers fan platform out there which has anything like those numbers. Imagine a twitter thread which has 200 people replying or a facebook post with that volume of interactivity. Anyways, thats enough justifying BRFCS.com. Which, for the record, is the longest going platform for Rovers fans, of which everyone is allowed an opinion, so long as they don't personally abuse other people. ;)

Covers a years loss of income due to a global pandemic

Let’s say it’s 25%... 25% of what that property COULD be worth is a truck load of money.

Can we please stop suggesting members of staff are due to get financial benefits from this unless you’ve got cold hard evidence? I don’t want any legal problems.

I’ve been speaking to a local property developer tonight - he thinks there’s much more money in this than has been discussed, although this is pure speculation and cannot be presented as fact The plans discuss 170 houses. As part of planning permission, some of these will need to be ‘affordable’ houses and he estimates a maximum of 250K for these and maybe 15 properties. After that - as long as there’s existing property within the Brockhall development, it’s a case of ‘build to match’. The most expensive property on Brockhall is currently 1.5M. That would give 155 houses that could be built to be 1.5M houses. That would be a poor decision, there isn’t the need for 155x 1.5M houses or probably enough space. When you look at the below image, there looks to be different plot sizes. Purely speculating we could be looking at: 15 @ 250K 60 @ 600K 40 @ 750K 30 @ 850K 25 @ 1.5M Giving a total ‘house’ value of the land at an eye watering £132.5M.