chaddyrovers

what do people want for the match day experience?

Can Rovers really be blame for the poor traffic control around the ground. Do you think local pubs want Rovers to get a cut of their profits given that's most pubs around the area are most busier on match days and quiet most of the time

I have previously said better food options. Can't comment on drinks or alcohol served as I bring my own soft drinks and I don't drink alcohol anymore.

Yes we all know Waggott has financial targets to meet but they are a different ways he could meet them. I see them as value for money as I can make every game, enjoy going to watch Rovers and its my only main social activity nowadays. Financial I can afford it easily. Please could you explain what would make the match day experience better?

Looking forward to this game, tickets bought already.

Stuart Webber is leaving Norwich now and now being with Leeds Director of Football job. La Liga club is interested also in him.

ok you are mixing the two viewpoints up here. I want the champions League to revert to the previous format where it is just the league champions in the champions league. That's my viewpoint but UEFA won't do it cos of money involved in TV rights and sponsorship. I have no problems in people who want to invest their own money into football clubs and improve them by investing in new facilities or signing better players who they couldn't before.

All depending on people's circumstances and what they are do. As I said previously that I think they are value for money from my own perspective and financial situation. I can attend every home game without any problem. For others is it a struggle to afford the price or can't make every game for examples meaning a ST isn't viable for them. So that's why they need be cheaper overall for a season.

Leicester have hold tanks with Manchester City number 2 Enzo Maresca according to media reports. Leeds owners seems keen on Farke, Corberan and Rodgers who have been interviewed according to media reports

UEFA are the ones who design and organise the Champions League. The Champions League should be just for league winners only. No I have no problems with clubs being state owned or have wealthy owners who invest and improve that club and its facilities I don't see what the problem is personally

I don't the European format one bit. Its all about Money for big clubs and the smaller nations league champions are force out of the competitions. I also think its too big and I would like it refer back to League champions only competition which would be much better in my opinion

City have spent £1.2 billion since Pep Guardiola joined City. Man Utd over £1 billion in the same time frame. Chelsea have close to £1.5 billion on transfer Liverpool £800 million Spurs £780 million Arsenal £950 million These are rough figures not exact figures. exactly. Mahraz, Laporte and Walker might leave hardly cast offs are they.

Mike, I don't think £379 is alot of money to pay for ST from my view point. I think it's value for money in my opinion. But you compare it to when we are PL and when season ticket revenue didn't matters compare to now when it does

no, you are over thinking it here. I was showing how much they have increased in 15 years which stands at a pound a month

its a pounds a month over 15 years. basically nothing

as I said time after time the price isn't alot in my opinion for myself to watch 23 Rovers game and I think its value for money for me. Outlined my reasons previously not going them again, But I said before(again) that not everyone can afford the current price and they should be lower.

not really. They got good offers and they let them go. why should it?

its a extra pound a month in 15 years. Not alot really is it?

We have PL football and money which offset the low price. Also if you compare that price to this season price(£379) its gone up 1 pounds a month. £180 over over 15 years.

Arsenal bottled it due they couldn't cope with the pressure. I wouldn't say Jesus or Zinchenko were Cast offs from Man City cos they are 2 quality players. I think Spurs are better than their league position suggests but problems with Conte and the past 2 appointments before him have been the major problem. I think Ange Postecoglou is a good appointment and will get them back playing attacking football again. Liverpool. Man Utd, Chelsea, Spurs and Newcastle and Arsenal should all have plenty of money to sign quality players, I know they aren't state owned but each of the clubs have plenty of money to spend. City being state ownership doesn't bother me one bit, but bothers a few BRFCS Members on here

stranglehold would winning every competition every year. They don't. Arsenal bottled it this season, etc. Liverpool and Spurs should have done miles better this season. 7 or 8 teams challenging for top 4 places for CL what we have in English Football is a great football leagues and PL is where the (majority of the) best players want to play.

Why would you want the best manager in the world in Pep Guardiola to move on from City? I would say they don't have a stranglehold on English football, we have the best league in the world which other leagues and clubs are very jealous off.

of course it needs to local so we can monitor him and also let him play for under 21's if he doesn't play there. I can understand why people will say keep him here and use him here plus develop him here under JDT

Depends whether you trust the club and manager to use him rightly he joined. I think if you are going to loan him out then it has been a club local so we can properly check on him.

he struggles cos his body is develop and growing. He is a talent we need to develop here long term. not sure I would loan him out.