….. and we also got a rare glimpse of the bigger villain, Suhail, sitting next to him. As usual, this goes under the radar because no-one except us eagle eyed fans has a clue who he is!

Another plucked from the Z / panic list as he has a pulse and a pair of hands.

Yes, we had a settled core of players during the good run. Now it’s just a mish - mash and a bit of a mess.

I think it’s a little known fact he broke his leg in that game 😉 P.S. Don’t mention the tickets .

And he’s had to change direction as the ball’s come across. As you say, he’s nowhere near Kargbo and the real time replay gives the full picture and context. Anyway, swings and roundabouts. We got the breaks against Preston but not today. It’s a result on a piece of paper at the end of the game.

I disagree that he “hangs a leg out”. He does nothing at all, Kargbo was the guilty party. We got done by the offside decision, but not that one.

No way, agree to disagree. It was a clear attempt to win a penalty. The defender makes no attempt to tackle.

Exactly. He tried to win a penalty by deliberately making contact with the defender. They do sometimes get given, but shouldn’t be.

I can read the posts now from after the game - “We can take the positives “. Nope, if we lose we lose and it’s all about the Eustace situation.

Was he balls!

Once Waggott goes, Suhail will buy another marionette to replace him. People need to go after him. He’s the nearest thing we’ve got to our absent owners.

Agreed on all fronts. We know there are reasons for it, but compare today’s attendance with, for example, the one at St Andrews yesterday evening. We are a ship wreck of a club.

Some of the mindless zombies won’t even have a clue what’s going on!

That wouldn’t surprise me at all. Another snake to add to our collection.

He is the one who should be the focus of anger. His protection is a cloak of invisibility.

I wouldn’t blame Eustace at all if he goes. A few desperate loan signings of players who’ve barely kicked a ball all season does not constitute a good Window. He’s not thick , and obviously realises that we are destined for a mid table finish. We don’t trust the goons running the place, so why should he? It’s going to draw attention to what a mess the club is, and that is a good thing.

Not if they have done it by the book. It’s not Derby’s concern that we have a game today. It’s surely now blindingly obvious, even to the “why would he go there? I can’t see it”, people, that he wants the job.

That California Rover on X will be the next to pipe up. Last week he asked me, in all seriousness, "Who care who the owners are? Our job is to get to the ground and support the team".

I’m afraid that some of our attending supporters do not have a tipping point, and will never wake up to reality. I do think this would generate more widespread hostility within the stadium, however.

This forum’s “friend”, Mr Nixon, has just posted a link to an article headlined, “Blackburn will ask for full fee on Eustace if Derby come calling”.

Perhaps the opportunity to get away from Waggott, Suhail and pseudo DOF Gestede is too good to resist?

As @roversfan99 has said, if Derby make an official approach, they must be confident of getting him. Will probably all come down to money.

They are amongst us. They deserve the misery, we don't.

I wouldn’t be so sure. The subtext of his recent interviews = “I’m pissed off”.

But perhaps not run by absent owners and their hired goons.