rigger

So is whether Ayala will still be playing, or that someone gets injured or suspended. Barnes as an unknown quantity could equally become a good player, as a bad one. I would say, in the financial position we are in, we have to take a chance on our players were we have potential, and strengthen from outside, in areas where we lack potential.

I named 5 ?

In six months time, if Ayala is no longer available, we will have, Hyam, Wharton, Phillips, Barnes and Carter for two starting places and one on the bench.

If he is a capable midfielder, then fair enough. If he is a center-half, who can do alright in mid-field , not so good.

When JDT first arrived and he came out with the "Dutch disease" statement. I thought great, at least he can see one of the problems, and maybe he will cure it. Half a season down the line, and we are trying to play the exact football that he took the piss out of. At this point in time I have to think that his original statements were just things, he had been told, that the fans wanted to hear.

If Waggot is judged by the owners, on his ability to reach a financial target (mainly through season ticket sales). Perhaps it is time for fans to stop that revenue stream ?

Do we need another center-back ?

As far as I am concerned, what he needs to do is get the team winning. An apology means fuck all to me.

And yet you keep the system of two central midfielders, when most teams at our level play with three. My philosophy would be : Make your midfield combative, keep the defence simple and strong, that way you won't lose as many matches. Then with a bit of good fortune, chances are taken and games are won.

Every cloud !

Seemingly we don't need to, because Dack drops in to help out our midfield two.

And seemingly the pies aren't much good either.

Make the whole sorry bunch play for the U21s tomorrow.

We have no proper plan A

Please note this is said with a barrow load of irony. At least we are still third.

What physicality upfront ?

It is boring just listening on the radio. The only thing I have taken in, is that Gallaghers commentary for radio Lancs is as bad as Gallaghers performance on the pitch.

For me Dack is not as good as he was pre-injuries, but he is still good enough to make our first team. So I would stick with him. This may be a different way to look at the situation but, just maybe, the first-team is not as reliant on Dack as it was before his injuries.

What's Poundland ?

The club will probably say, that you are getting a fiver off the Wigan game. It's just that everybody else is also getting the discount.

You've hit the nail on the head.

Does it matter, we should be good enough at home to beat either Forest Green or Brum.

And of those 732 minutes I doubt if Dack has been back helping out midfield for more than 10% of them.

How many games has Dack played ?

I don't care what statistics you come up with. Playing three central midfielders is the way to win midfield battles