rigger

When I first started going to the Rovers, I could not see us going up from the second division. Oh how times have changed (said with a hint of sarcasm).

Being the team that won the league.

Yet in the knock-out stages we went behind in every game.

It makes you want to cry.

Is that what you expect, or want ?

A very well constructed arguement

Our sell-on cut would be more. In my opinion the money would be better for us, in the Rovers pockets rather than in anyone elses.

I am bald and from Blackburn.

Eastham's main draw-back is his lack of height.

What is a favourable outcome to the court-case ?

Go to the highest bidder.

That doesn't make it any harder as it is the same for all teams.

What brings you to that conclusion ?

Of course it does. But there are not many managers that will drop injury prone first team players, when they have no replacements.

Look on the bright side. At least you lived through those times. They cannot take away the memories.

If he is injury prone, his potential is zero to a club in our financial position.

I think we might regret, ignoring things that are going wrong, more.

In our position, if he isn't ready for the first team due to injuries, then get rid. Let some other club invest their time and money in bringing him through.

Is that one of the Scottish players, returned home early ?

As long as you are still producing acceptable performances.

OK I change my statement to, Inferred that.

And yet you say with certainty that they aren't good enough.

Not really.

I don't think Szmodics is that quick. He is alert, energetic and a good finisher.

The problem is that he may not have as successful a season next time, his value may then drop. Do you take the money now or take a chance. In our present situation I don't think we are in a position to take a chance, and in Sigurdsson we may have a ready made replacement.