You cant be basing transfer business on potential sell ons. The key part is always the guaranteed fee, not potential add ons.

By that logic. Scott Hogan and Lukas Jutkeiwicz should have been signed over Gueye and Ohashi. I love how signing a player right at the end of his career who shows signs of considerable decline is the risk free option.

As if we would buy at the end of it. Just get him as number 1 long term if hes the one. Although maybe its based on the old rumour.

https://www.twentefans.nl/drommel-wil-weg-bij-psv-engelse-club-wil-huren-met-koopoptie/ Says here we want Drommel on loan. Pathetic that we are trying to borrow a player who potentially could be a number 1 for a number of years considering the money we have brought in

This idea of replacing man for man last years squad is stupid. Not only because some players dont need replacing which you have considered but on the flip side, it would only work if our squad was well balanced in all areas last season, and it wasnt. So no, Telalovic doesnt need replacing directly. But we only had 1 senior striker last season and he missed a lot of games. Its all about how we are looking in the here and now to see if we are well covered, rather than these illogical comparisons. 1 senior full back on either side, and 1 incompetent senior keeper, so we are 3 short there. 1 short in midfield, and a couple of wingers.

Gary Bowyer 😂 Are they just planning on repeatedly appointing the same managers? Ian Holloway perhaps next?

Is there any job that you havent suggested that people put money on Alex Neil?

I wonder if Hull signing Puerta will be as an alternative to Travis. If we got Baker, it would have to be at considerably less than £2.5m to represent any value. But options of Baker, Tronstad, Travis, Buckley and at times JRC would leave us well stocked. Saying that, Seri is going to Saudi Arabia and Hull's new midfielder is facing a lengthy ban so perhaps not.

I wonder if Carter is injured as he limped off late at the weekend and doesnt seem to be on the training pictures, although I may be wrong. There is no mention of any potential signings in defence. One injury for Carter leaves us with only 2 full backs and 3 centre backs, one of whom can play only in a back 3.

Just because Ohashi has started well doesnt necessarily mean that other Japanese players would.

He should have a say, 100%. But if his idea is to just sign old Birmingham players and fill the team with too many over the hill players, that is a huge concern. He keeps talking about building a team, yet would rather loan a pensioner goalkeeper over signing one of the alternatives.

Eustace isnt trying to get the old relegated Birmingham team together. Just half of it. Now is a great time for transfer disagreements. Its not as if we have 10 days until the window closes and need 5 or 6 players.

Maybe an opinion of your own? Unless you have ultimate faith in him in terms of transfers? In which case, why? Eustace hasnt worked with him for a year. He is very old and his performances have declined rapidly and he was let go by a team who went down. Perhaps his opinion is out of date.

I appreciate that you have acknowledged to an extent that they are unwilling to invest but in the main you have reverted back to somewhat empathising with them, justifying them and deflecting back onto targetting the arse licker Waggott for his communication rather than the main issue. There is no justification in any reluctance in being unwilling to have to equal any investment in a seperate temporary bond. As @islander200 said, why not invest half? But beyond that, in the last 12 months (not in line with the accounting period) we have operated at a considerable profit. Reinvesting a chunk wouldnt even require then to invest. You also mentioned a mixture of taps off and transfer splurges in the past. Its misrepesentative based on this idea that covering losses as all Championship owners do is investing in the club. We have not spent more than £2m on a transfer in 5 years. Before that, we bought Gallagher with predominantly the Raya money and the year before they did invest £10m which was an anomoly. Prior, a few summers of taps off, player sales, minimal incomings. The only other summer in 14 years where we spent a bit was when we came down, and that was more than covered by outgoings. They have been consistent with the odd exception in not funding the club in terms of investing in it.

Will Dembele be on highest earner at the club level wages factoring in a relegation drop? Also I dont get why Newcastle would have to sign someone to let him go. He was a bizarre signing to begin with. He is 5th choice. You are right though. Big outlay for a very short term focused recruitment haul. And Eustace keeps going on about building a football club etc, yet his choices of players seemingly spit in the face of that. He will live or die by any decision. But he managed him for a brief opening of a season in which he showed to be on the decline physically, is now a year older, was released (in agreement with fans) by a side he played a part in the relegation of. The reason that people are against him is because of his age and because he has actively declined in quality especially over the last year. Your counter argument is merely that Eustace has managed him before. And Johansson has been a top quality keeper at this level for years. Basing his ability on the highlights of one game would be stupid.

Feels like a bit of a power struggle and its not something we can afford so close to the deadline. Very much against Eustace's desire to re-create his old Birmingham side and also our squad could go from being too young to too old in one window. The Stansfield for big money suggestion was never going to happen and sounds based on what @Tugayisgod is suggesting that Nixon has backed down from talk of a multi million pound deal and is reporting that he would be a loan. As a permanent even though he isnt in a position where we need to strengthen, at least he would give us a younger asset of which weve been stripped. Good player but any loan would be expensive and we would face big competition. Ruddy obviously a big no, would be a terrible and unacceptable signing especially considering superior alternatives. Dembele would be a really uninspiring addition as touched on. Baker has question marks, his injury record and the price previously reported is too much. He also again is an older player. But he is a decent player at this level who would provide a goal threat and an ability from set pieces.

They dont wish to invest and that has always been an issue. The case is obviously an extra barrier but they wouldnt have invested anyway. We have brought in so much in the last 6 months that its merely a case of using a slither the funds we have as a club raised ourselves. And even if they needed to invest, as you say they can use the bond. They just dont want to.

But that only changes things if they were going to invest in the first place if they could. Which they still can, but wont. We have raked in so much in fees that any investment would be reinvestment of fees in, and even beyond that, they can invest and put an equal amount in the bond. Talk of a late bumper kitty dependant on the court case (a week and a half before the window closes) was total delusion.

The court case doesnt change much in this window. Anyone expecting a potential late spree off the back of the case going in Venkys favour were deluding themselves. At most, we was always going to spend a slither of the £40m received. At a push.

They had one summer when they splurged a decent sum on Brereton and Armstrong. Otherwise, im struggling to remember many other splurges.

Where is this from?

Even then, would leave us very short in midfield and defence.

Poku is a winger.

Even if we signed a good keeper, we would struggle to compete over 46 games with the current outfield players. Nowhere near enough before you come to issues with quality.

Im sure New York Rover is right on the pulse with their cryptic transfer insights.